CETT Barcelona School of Tourism, Hospitality and Gastronomy vs HEC Paris vs University of Uyo - UNIUYO vs Akwa Ibom State University - AKSU vs Obong university - OU
Side-by-side comparison from 183 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Diverse international student community
- +Valuable education in tourism and related fields
- +Positive living experience in Barcelona
- +Engaging, practical academics and expert professors
- +Strong community and supportive environment
- +Personal and professional growth opportunities
- +Conducive and safe learning environment
- +High-quality teaching and supportive lecturers
- +Excellent educational and extracurricular experiences
- +Inclusive and supportive learning environment.
- +Knowledgeable and approachable lecturers.
- +Well-structured academic programs.
- +Supportive learning environment and committed, approachable lecturers.
- +Peaceful, focused academic atmosphere.
- +Strong sense of community and close relationships.
- +Diverse international student body and multicultural environment.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring problem.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from faculty and staff is a major concern.
- -Administrative and organizational issues significantly hinder the program.
- -Teaching quality is poor, with professors imposing views and limited course selection.
- -Limited recognition outside France and poor career prospects compared to top MBAs are issues.
- -Administrative issues and lecturer inflexibility cause stress and academic failure.
- -Insufficient and overcrowded facilities hinder practical learning and student comfort.
- -Frequent academic strikes disrupt the learning process.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration and inefficiency.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources hinder the learning experience.
- -Poor communication and a lack of support from faculty and staff are consistently problematic.
- -Administrative and management issues are frequently cited.
- -Facilities are often described as outdated and poorly maintained.
- -A lack of resources and support is a common complaint.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Communication breakdowns and lack of support are recurring problems.
Nothing to show
With an overall positive assessment, the university particularly excels in Student Life and Internationality, both scoring 4.67. Facilities, Professors, and Location are also rated highly at 4.33. Areas with the lowest scores, though still solid, are Accomodation and Value, each receiving a rating of 4. The university demonstrates a robust offering, with particular strengths in its vibrant student community and global outlook.
With excellent scores across several key aspects, this institution shines brightest in **Internationality** (4.41) and **Student Life** (4.26). **Value** (4.22) also received a commendable rating. Conversely, the **Location** stands out as the area with the lowest rating (3.77), suggesting it is the least strong aspect among the surveyed categories. Other areas like Facilities, Professors, and Accomodation received solid, above-average scores.
Among the evaluated aspects of the university, location stands out as its strongest attribute, receiving the highest rating. Conversely, accommodation and internationality are areas where the institution appears to have the most room for improvement, scoring lowest. Other categories like professors, student life, and value received solid, mid-range scores, indicating a generally positive but not exceptional performance.
Student feedback indicates a robust university experience, particularly excelling in **Student Life**, which received the highest rating. The **Value** of education is also highly regarded. Conversely, **Internationality** represents the weakest area, scoring the lowest. Other aspects like Facilities, Professors, Location, and Accommodation fall within a generally positive range.
This institution exhibits a varied rating profile. Accommodation stands out as a particularly strong point, receiving the highest score. Conversely, internationality is the weakest area, with a significantly lower rating. Other aspects, such as professors, location, student life, and value, fall within a moderate range. Facilities are rated slightly below average.
Consistently outstanding scores mark this university's performance. Across all assessed areas, from facilities and professors to student life and internationality, a perfect 5/5 rating signifies excellence. Accommodation and location also received top marks. With a perfect score of 5/5 for value, it appears to offer a comprehensive and highly satisfactory experience without any discernible weak points.
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 4.25/5 from four reviews, ~75% of feedback is positive. Students highlight satisfaction with language immersion and diverse nationalities, finding it a great choice for tourism and F&B education.
Around 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting engaging academics, supportive community, and excellent faculty. A small portion, about 9%, express dissatisfaction with administrative inefficiencies and curriculum organization.
Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting a conducive learning environment, good teaching, and safety. A smaller portion, about 8.7%, expresses concerns about stress and inadequate facilities.
Over 70% of 15 reviews are positive, highlighting academic excellence, discipline, and a diverse, supportive learning environment. No negative feedback was reported.
With an average rating of 3.5/5 from 4 reviews, ~50% are positive, highlighting a quiet, supportive learning environment and committed lecturers. No negative feedback was recorded.
With a perfect 5/5 average rating from one review, ~100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight an enriching, multicultural experience with diverse international engagement.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Very international and interesting place to be and opens a lot of opportunities, however the administration is very french and facilities are subpar (gym, classrooms) meaning the academic affairs is pretty much useless and lastly we are graded on a curve which can create a toxic environment because of the competition. With that being said the pros outweighs the cons by far.
My experience at the University of Uyo was a mixed bag. On the plus side, I loved the sense of community and camaraderie among students. The lecturers in my department were knowledgeable and supportive, and I appreciated the opportunities for research and personal growth. However, I struggled with several issues. The hostel facilities were not ideal, and one major concern was the no-cooking policy in the hostels, which was quite challenging for many students. Additionally, there were times when administrative processes felt slow and bureaucratic. Another major concern was the high billing system, which felt excessive at times. Furthermore, I felt that the curriculum focused too much on theoretical aspects, leaving us somewhat unprepared for real-life practical issues. The infrastructure and facilities in some areas of the campus were also inadequate and outdated. Overall, I'd say UNIUYO has its strengths and weaknesses, but it was a valuable experience that helped me grow as a person and a professional.
Akwa Ibom State University is one of the prestigious institution in Nigeria. The University has shaped thousands of grads into world impacting leaders and mentors in their respective field. It has through through highly intelligent lecturers ascertain the transfer of knowledge meaningfully. But, I must say, there are also some slack to the functionality. The University follows a defined curriculum which every year, same things, same way, same courses were taught in the same classroom. It doesn't give chance to keep track of new discoveries or probably push students to discovering one. Student are more or less pressured to cram and digest when required. There's no avenue to give individual perspective but same thing was given by the lecturers. To the end, if I was the leadership of the University, I would ensure the review of the curriculum give chance to new discoveries and then encourage the students to do something with what they learn even while in school.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
