EADA Business School vs Escuela Europea de Negocios vs Universidade da Coruña - UDC vs Universidad CEU San Pablo - CEU USP vs UIC Barcelona
Side-by-side comparison from 318 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Strong personal and leadership development
- +Practical business knowledge from experienced professionals
- +Valuable real-world application of learning
- +Renowned university status and societal impact
- +Welcoming and fulfilling study abroad experience
- +Excellent teaching structure
- +Broad international perspective and exchange opportunities
- +Strong emphasis on practical learning and professional development
- +Involved and approachable faculty who care about education
- +Practical, real-world skills training
- +Professional, industry-experienced faculty
- +Supportive and welcoming atmosphere
- +Excellent academic quality and well-prepared graduates
- +Supportive and international student community
- +Engaging and knowledgeable faculty
- +Strong practical focus with real-world brand experience
- +Supportive teachers and excellent campus facilities/resources
- +Diverse, multicultural student body and environment
- +Small class sizes and quality teaching
- +Strong design and artistic programs
- +European exchange opportunities
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant inconvenience.
- -Program content can be too basic or poorly implemented.
- -Facilities are not always well-maintained or up-to-date.
- -Administrative and management issues, including poor communication and disorganization, are frequently criticized.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources are a common source of frustration.
- -The curriculum is often perceived as irrelevant or poorly delivered.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are major concerns.
- -Excessive administrative and management issues create frustration.
- -Lack of resources and support hinder learning experiences.
- -Low professor English proficiency and lack of student/teacher engagement.
- -Poor organization and administrative issues.
- -Administrative and management issues.
- -Unhelpful and indifferent staff.
- -Deceptive financial practices.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are consistent complaints.
- -The curriculum lacks relevance and practical application for many students.
- -Administrative and management issues disrupt learning and student support.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder effective study.
- -Lack of clear communication and feedback creates frustration.
With an overall strong performance, the university excels particularly in its Location, receiving a near-perfect score. Internationality and Student Life also stand out as significant strengths. Conversely, Accomodation represents the weakest area of assessment, though still within a generally positive range. The remaining categories, including Facilities, Professors, and Value, all received solid marks, indicating a well-rounded educational experience.
Receiving outstanding marks, this institution excels particularly in its Professors, Student Life, Accommodation, Internationality, and Value, all scoring a perfect 5. Facilities and Location also stand out with a strong 4. The university's weakest, though still highly positive, area lies in its Facilities and Location, which, while good, did not reach the perfect score achieved in other key aspects.
Offering a diverse range of experiences, this institution shows its strongest performance in the **Professors** category, receiving a high rating. Conversely, **Accomodation** emerged as the area with the lowest score. Other aspects like Facilities, Location, Student Life, Internationality, and Value also received moderately positive feedback, suggesting room for improvement in certain key student support areas.
This institution garners a solid academic reputation, with professors receiving a strong rating of 3.82. While facilities and student life also score well around 3.6, accommodation emerges as the weakest area, rated at 3.16. Internationality and value also present as moderate aspects of the university experience.
Overall, the university garners positive feedback, with **Professors** receiving the highest marks at 4.25, followed closely by **Facilities** at 4.17. **Student Life** is rated a respectable 3.75, while **Internationality** scores 3.83. Areas for potential improvement include **Accomodation**, which received the lowest rating of 3.33, and **Location** at 3.91. The university also scores well in **Value** at 3.92.
This university garners exceptionally high marks in internationality, boasting a rating of 4.65. Facilities also received strong acclaim at 4.56, closely followed by professors at 4.53 and value at 4.48. The student experience is well-regarded, with a 4.35 rating for student life. Location and accommodation represent the areas with the lowest scores, both falling in the upper 3-point range.
Excelling in several key areas, this institution receives top marks for its facilities, accommodation, and internationality. Conversely, areas for improvement include professors and student life, both scoring moderately. The location and overall value are also rated positively, indicating a generally well-regarded academic environment with specific strengths in physical resources and global engagement.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (over 97%), highlighting excellent experiences, personal growth, and practical business learning. A very small percentage of feedback mentions minor issues with program communication and administration.
With a perfect 5/5 average rating from one review, sentiment is overwhelmingly positive. The reviewer highlighted their rewarding acceptance, a welcoming atmosphere, and excellent teaching structure.
With 64 reviews and a 3.84 average rating, ~81% of feedback is positive. Students highly value the international experience, strong academic learning, and professional development opportunities. Some note that teaching methods and practical experience could be improved.
Approximately 74% of 28 reviews are positive, highlighting professional, sector-active teachers and practical, real-world facilities. A small portion of feedback (~7%) expresses disappointment with low English proficiency among some professors and organizational issues.
With a 4.2/5 average rating from 15 reviews, ~93% are positive, highlighting strong academics, supportive classmates, and good job preparation. ~7% of feedback is negative, citing issues with unhelpful administration.
With ~94% positive sentiment, reviews highlight enriching theoretical and practical skills, multicultural environments, and helpful teachers. Some noted the campus is a bit far from the city. No negative feedback was reported.
With a 4/5 average rating from 1 review, ~100% of feedback is positive. The single positive review highlights strong design programs, small class sizes, good teaching quality, and a charming city location. There is no negative feedback.
In my experience, this business school is considerably more hyped than the actual value it delivers. While the marketing and reputation may create high expectations, the learning experience often falls short. One of the biggest concerns is the lack of placement support. Students are largely expected to manage their career opportunities on their own, which can be disappointing given the investment made in the program. Academically, many subjects are covered only at a surface level. The curriculum tends to focus on providing a broad overview rather than developing deep understanding or practical expertise. Most topics are wrapped up in just one or two classes, which is rarely enough to gain meaningful knowledge or build strong skills. As a result, students are often left to do significant self-learning if they want to truly understand the material. While the school introduces a wide range of business concepts, it doesn't always provide the depth, rigour, or hands-on learning that many students expect from a quality business education. Overall, I found the institution to be somewhat overrated, with the reputation and hype exceeding the actual learning outcomes and career support provided.
Nothing to show
The university was so good, I think that it would be your best time in your life. Yo meet new friends who will be forever and, mostly, you learn a lot about important things such how to be a good professional.
Nothing to show
Classes are good, I would try to make them more interactive and with more practices in class. Professors normally are good, in the english course I believe the english of the teachers could be better specially if the course is taught in that language. I also believe professors could interact more with their students and try to get in contact with students they see may be struggling. Otherwise the campus, although a bit small is fine, really nice, the library could be a little bigger.
Studying Advertising and public relations at CEU Cardenal Herrera was an enriching and transformative experience. One thing I standout is the combined theoretical and practical skills we learned throughout the career. We work hand on hand with well known brands that give us a profesional view and a bigger understanding of the profesional world. The multicultural environment at CEU help me develop cultural sensibility and open my perspective because of the diverse backgrounds. The most enriching experience was living in the amazing city en Valencia, its stunning architecture and its amazing food. I graduated feeling confident and prepared to enter to the professional world.
Nothing to show
