EADA Business School vs EU Business School vs Escola d'Art i Disseny de Tarragona - EADT vs Rovira i Virgili University - URV vs Cesda Flight School
Side-by-side comparison from 516 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Diverse international community and enriching global perspectives
- +Strong academic programs with real-world application and expert faculty
- +Engaging learning environment with practical case studies and soft-skills development
- +Helpful professors and career support
- +Valuable practical and theoretical business knowledge
- +Enriching overall student experience
- +Enhanced career prospects and professional development abroad
- +Expanded global perspective and architectural vision
- +High-quality, research-oriented academics and teaching
- +Supportive and approachable faculty and staff
- +Excellent location with good facilities and international opportunities
Nothing to show
- +Experiential learning and business creation
- +Industry leader insights and networking opportunities
- +Diverse international environment and impactful outcomes
- +Teacher dedication and real-world focus
- +Integrated and close learning environment
- +Growing campus and accessible transportation
- -Administrative and management issues cause poor communication and inflexibility.
- -Program content and delivery do not consistently meet expectations.
- -Administrative and management issues cause disorganization and lack of support.
- -Outdated facilities and a focus on attendance over quality education are criticized.
- -The educational program is perceived as basic and unaccredited in some regions.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Facilities are perceived as outdated and insufficient.
- -The curriculum lacks practicality and relevance.
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
- -Outdated and unengaging teaching staff negatively impact the learning experience.
- -Course content and structure are often poorly designed and disorganized.
Nothing to show
- -Disorganized and unresponsive administration.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
- -Unengaging and ineffective teaching methods.
- -Poor communication and lack of transparency from administration
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities
- -Overcrowded classes and insufficient resources
This institution achieves strong scores across multiple metrics, with an exceptional rating for Location (4.93). Student Life and Internationality also stand out with ratings above 4.5. Among the surveyed areas, Accomodation received the lowest score at 4.17, indicating room for improvement in this specific aspect.
This institution excels in several key areas, with Location and Internationality receiving the highest marks at 4.73. Student Life also scores well at 4.22. Conversely, Accomodation stands out as the weakest area, scoring 3.42, suggesting room for improvement. Facilities and Professors are rated consistently around 4.04, while Value sits at a respectable 3.87.
This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in **internationality** and **value**, both receiving perfect scores. Its academic core also shines, with **professors** earning a high rating of 4. However, the university's **facilities** present a significant area for improvement, scoring a low 1. Student life and accommodation are rated moderately well, while the location is also a point of moderate concern.
This institution garners its highest marks for its **Professors** (4.02) and **Value** (3.80). Areas showing moderate performance include **Student Life** (3.72), **Internationality** (3.75), and **Facilities** (3.68). Its lowest-rated aspects are **Location** (3.40) and **Accomodation** (3.45), suggesting these are the primary areas for potential improvement.
Nothing to show
This institution garners strong overall evaluations, with location standing out as the highest-rated aspect at 4.67. Accommodations and internationality also received excellent scores of 4.5. Areas demonstrating solid performance include facilities and student life, both at 4.33, alongside value and professors, which are rated at 4.25.
This institution garners excellent feedback, particularly excelling in **Facilities** and **Student Life**, both receiving perfect scores. **Internationality** also stands out with a top rating. Conversely, **Location** is the weakest point, scoring a moderate three. Other aspects like Professors, Accommodation, and Value are rated positively at a solid four.
~98% of reviews are positive, highlighting a multicultural environment, strong academic content, and valuable personal/professional development. A few reviews note issues with administrative flexibility and program delivery.
Around 74% of reviews are positive, praising professors, career services, and valuable skills gained. The remaining ~7.6% of feedback expresses concerns about disorganization and the quality of education.
With a perfect 5/5 average rating from 1 review, this university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback. The sole reviewer highlights its significant career benefits and ability to broaden professional vision. Negative feedback is negligible.
Around 94% of reviews are positive, highlighting rigorous programs, cooperative teachers, and convenient facilities. A small percentage of feedback notes administrative inefficiency and outdated teaching.
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 4.4/5 from 5 reviews, students are highly satisfied. Recurring positive themes include practical, hands-on learning experiences and valuable networking opportunities. A minimal amount of feedback noted occasional scheduling issues with tutoring.
With a single review, the university receives a 4/5 average rating. Approximately 100% of feedback is positive, highlighting good teacher-student relationships and real-world focused teaching.
In my experience, this business school is considerably more hyped than the actual value it delivers. While the marketing and reputation may create high expectations, the learning experience often falls short. One of the biggest concerns is the lack of placement support. Students are largely expected to manage their career opportunities on their own, which can be disappointing given the investment made in the program. Academically, many subjects are covered only at a surface level. The curriculum tends to focus on providing a broad overview rather than developing deep understanding or practical expertise. Most topics are wrapped up in just one or two classes, which is rarely enough to gain meaningful knowledge or build strong skills. As a result, students are often left to do significant self-learning if they want to truly understand the material. While the school introduces a wide range of business concepts, it doesn't always provide the depth, rigour, or hands-on learning that many students expect from a quality business education. Overall, I found the institution to be somewhat overrated, with the reputation and hype exceeding the actual learning outcomes and career support provided.
As far as universities go I think EU business school comes first in terms of student-staff relationship. Every member of the staff I have encountered has been more than helpful. What i think should improve as even tho its not connected to my previous point is I think the school should have more leniency towards tuition payment specially to international students because we are here despite the challenges of having to find willing banks to exchange local currencies to Euros.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Being here has been such a wild ride. Moving to a new country every semester and learning local languages has been both fun and challenging, but it's kinda exhausting too. Still, that hustle gives me an adrenaline rush I low-key love! The best part has been seeing our business ideas come to life and when people genuinely appreciate and engage with something we’ve built, it makes all the hard work worth it.
Nothing to show
