EADA Business School vs EU Business School vs IESE Business School vs ESADE Business School vs IE University
Side-by-side comparison from 610 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Personalized and practical learning with engaging, dynamic professors.
- +Diverse international environment fostering global business preparation.
- +Effective adaptation and maintenance of academic standards, especially during challenges.
- +Practical, industry-focused learning and expert professors
- +Real-world application and out-of-class learning opportunities
- +Vibrant international student community and campus life
- +Inspiring cultural experiences and inclusive communities
- +Strong career advancement opportunities and alumni networks
- +High-quality academics and excellent faculty engagement
- +Practical and engaging learning with real-world faculty insights
- +Collaborative and diverse cohort fostering community and personal growth
- +Supportive administrative staff and informative introductory events
- +Supportive faculty and personalized guidance for academic and career success.
- +Excellent facilities, enriching coursework, and practical skill development.
- +Abundant opportunities and networking for future career prospects.
- +Practical education & industry-experienced professors
- +Strong company and professional network
- +Attentive faculty and excellent facilities
- +Engaging and supportive instructors
- +Practical and relevant course content
- +Strong community and peer support
- -Administrative and management issues disrupt program delivery.
- -Lack of focus on promised program features like sustainability.
- -Inconsistent or arbitrary grading practices.
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant problem.
- -Education quality is poor with outdated facilities and lack of resources.
- -Accreditation issues limit future opportunities.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources negatively impact the learning experience.
- -Lack of communication and support from the institution is a recurring problem.
- -Administrative and financial issues, including perceived exploitation and poor refunds.
- -Outdated facilities and IT infrastructure that fail under pressure.
- -Lack of focus on critical thinking and intellectual development.
- -Disappointing academic quality and misleading marketing.
- -Poor program management and perceived lack of flexibility.
- -Uninspiring campus environment and limited student experience.
- -Low teacher English proficiency and internal university contradictions.
- -Administrative & management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are frequently criticized.
- -Lack of effective communication and support is a recurring problem.
This institution presents a well-rounded profile, with **location** emerging as its strongest asset, achieving an exceptional rating. **Internationality** also scores highly, reflecting a global outlook. Conversely, **accommodation** received the lowest marks, indicating a potential area for improvement. Other categories such as facilities, professors, student life, and value all fall within a strong but slightly lower range, demonstrating good overall performance.
The university excels in its **location** (4.7) and **internationality** (4.69), indicating a highly desirable and globally connected environment. **Student life** (4.17) also received a strong rating. The primary area for improvement lies in **accommodation** (3.48), which is the lowest-scoring category. Other aspects such as **facilities** (4.05), **professors** (3.98), and **value** (3.86) are rated moderately well.
Overall, the university garners strong student satisfaction. Its most highly rated aspects include Internationality (4.74), Location (4.73), and Student Life (4.70). Professors (4.62) and Value (4.64) also receive excellent scores. The weakest area, though still positive, is Accomodation at 4.09, while Facilities are rated at 4.36.
This institution receives high marks for its professors, with an impressive score of 4.37, closely followed by strong ratings for internationality and value (both around 4.1). Student life and location also score well, nearing 3.9. Areas for potential improvement include accommodation, rated at 3.67, and facilities, at 3.8.
This institution demonstrates considerable strengths in several key areas. Internationality stands out with an impressive rating, closely followed by an excellent score for Location. Student life and the quality of Professors also receive high marks. However, Accommodations represent the weakest area, scoring significantly lower than other aspects. Value for money and Facilities are rated favorably, though not as high as the top-performing categories.
This institution demonstrates considerable strengths, particularly in its **Facilities** and **Internationality**, both receiving outstanding ratings of 4.5. **Value** also scores highly at 4.5. Areas with slightly lower, though still positive, scores include **Student Life** (3), indicating room for improvement in this aspect compared to other categories. Overall, it presents a well-rounded offering.
With high marks across the board, this university excels in faculty expertise, earning a near-perfect 4.67. Its location and accommodation are also well-regarded at 4.38. Student life, though strong at 4.22, represents the lowest-rated category in this assessment. Internationality and value for money are notably strong, both receiving 4.44.
With an average of 4.47/5 from 113 reviews, students praise academic quality, practical learning, and the international environment. A small minority (~2.7%) noted issues with administration responsiveness and program consistency.
With ~74% positive reviews and an average rating of 3.82/5, students highlight industry-expert professors and practical, real-world learning. Around 8% of feedback noted disorganization and basic curriculum.
With a ~100% positive rating, reviews highlight exceptional experiences, transformative professional growth, and excellent faculty. Students praise the welcoming culture, global diversity, and strong career connections. No negative feedback was recorded.
Approximately 90% of reviews are positive, highlighting enriching academic and personal experiences, practical approaches, and strong faculty support. A small percentage of negative feedback mentions issues with value for money and student cohort dynamics.
Approximately 96.7% of reviews are positive, highlighting excellent facilities, supportive faculty, and enriching academic/networking opportunities. A small percentage of feedback mentions concerns about academic standards or the campus environment.
About 50% of reviews are positive, praising practical education and professor relationships. The remaining ~25% of feedback includes some criticism, particularly regarding English language program quality.
Reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~100% of feedback recommending the program. Students highlight great teachers, practical course content, and a supportive, diverse community as key strengths. There are no negative reviews.
My time at EADA is something I'll look back on with a big smile. The classes were well paced and the professors were great, not just as teachers but as people. They'd share their own real world experiences which made everything feel much more grounded and useful. Campus life was a lot of fun. Between the events, the outdoor activities and the people you meet across programs, you find your people pretty quickly. EADA has this big family energy that's hard to describe but very easy to feel. And it doesn't stop when you graduate either. The alumni network is genuinely one of the best parts, people actually stay connected and look out for each other. I'd recommend it without hesitation.
I love to take a path in a good environment to perform my ability to intend all the perspective that matches and are suitable for every student in daily lifestyle and work in a way which will be helpful for the needs or students to get higher oppurtuinitied
Being at IESE was one of the best experiences of my life: 1- Professionally: this MBA is one of the best connected schools with top consultancy and banking sectors. for example, the 3 MBBs come to the school to train and interview candidates, ensuring a higher successful rate. It allowed me to jump from a civil engineering position to work for McKinsey. 2- Personal and cultural : amazing transformative 2 years, with people from all over the world (73 nationalities in my class) with great values. Totally worthy it.
If you are looking for a law specialization master's degree (LLM) in the non so traditional areas of law, and you are seeking for an international fully enriching experience, ESADE is your best choice. ESADE started as a business school so the MBA and other business degrees are their core. Nonetheless, law education and in particular the specialisation master's (international business law and intellectual property and ICT law) are also on the top Europe's LLM of their fields. They combine an excellent program, with the best teachers available in Barcelona and with a more than enough amount of resources to study and help the student to get initiated in their career field. Also, this is the best international experience out there; personally, I got to share a classroom with other 25 students, where only 6 of them were Spanish, the other 19 including myself were a mixture of different nationalities, especially from Latin American countries.
I chose this university because some friends who had studied there had told me it was a great experience, and it's true. It has excellent facilities and a faculty that always encourages you to do your best. They motivate you a lot and guide you in a way I hadn't seen before. They are very approachable professors and are attentive to how they can optimize your studies. I made good friends there, I have good memories of that experience, and I might even pursue some further studies because it left a very positive impression on me.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
