EADA Business School vs EU Business School vs OBS Business School vs IESE Business School vs La Salle U.R.L.
Side-by-side comparison from 508 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Practical, case-based learning with contemporary HR and sustainability focus
- +Strong international community and networking opportunities
- +Engaging teaching from industry professionals and well-structured courses
- +Practical, real-world business education
- +Diverse, international student community
- +Opportunities for networking and career development
- +Strong business programs with real-world application
- +Engaging professors and challenging coursework
- +Networking opportunities and appealing study location
- +Inspiring cultural experiences and inclusive communities
- +Strong career advancement opportunities and alumni networks
- +High-quality academics and excellent faculty engagement
- +International environment and diverse cultures
- +Engaging, proactive, and technology-focused learning methods
- +Strong academic content and knowledgeable faculty
- +practical, project-based learning with real companies
- +excellent teaching quality from industry professionals
- +strong academic and personal support from staff
- +Flexible online learning format
- +Comprehensive and relevant curriculum
- +Efficient support and accessible materials
- -Administrative and management issues cause poor communication and inflexibility.
- -Program content and delivery do not meet expectations.
- -Grading is perceived as arbitrary.
- -Disorganization and administrative issues are prevalent.
- -Educational quality, staff helpfulness, and facilities are subpar.
- -The institution prioritizes profit over genuine educational support and accreditation.
- -Lack of qualified teachers and poor educational quality
- -Perceived as a for-profit institution rather than a school
- -Ineffective learning environment and useless forum structure
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources negatively impact the learning experience.
- -Lack of communication and support from the institution is a recurring problem.
- -Outdated curriculum and outdated facilities.
- -Administrative and management issues are prevalent.
- -Lack of forward-thinking and innovative educational approach.
- -Inadequate administrative and management support, particularly for international students.
- -Misleading information regarding course delivery and lack of proper orientation.
- -Administrative and management issues create frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
- -Course content is often irrelevant or poorly delivered.
This institution receives excellent marks across several areas. Its **location** is its strongest asset, followed closely by its **internationality**. **Student life**, **facilities**, and **professors** are also highly rated. The university's **value** for money is also a positive point. The area with the lowest score, though still respectable, is **accommodation**.
This university shows particularly strong performance in its location and internationality, both receiving high scores. Student life and facilities also stand out positively. However, accommodation appears to be the weakest area, scoring notably lower than other aspects. The value and professor ratings fall in the mid-range, indicating solid but not exceptional performance in these categories.
This institution presents a largely consistent performance across several key areas. Facilities, professors, location, accommodation, and internationality all received a solid 2.5 rating, indicating a generally positive experience. The strongest aspect appears to be value, scoring a 3. Conversely, student life is the weakest area, rated at 2, suggesting room for improvement in that regard.
Overall, the university garners strong student satisfaction. Its most highly rated aspects include Internationality (4.74), Location (4.73), and Student Life (4.70). Professors (4.62) and Value (4.64) also receive excellent scores. The weakest area, though still positive, is Accomodation at 4.09, while Facilities are rated at 4.36.
Outstanding scores are evident for this university's **Location** (5), **Facilities** (4.67), and **Student Life** (4.67). Conversely, the **Professors** category received the lowest rating at 3.33. Other areas like Accomodation (4.33), Internationality (4), and Value (4) are rated positively.
Overall, the university garners positive feedback, with **Facilities** emerging as its strongest asset at 4.1. **Professors** also receive a commendable score of 3.8. Areas rated lower include **Internationality** at 3.5 and **Accomodation** and **Value**, both at 3.6, representing opportunities for improvement. Student life and location also fall within a solid, though not outstanding, range.
This university garners excellent feedback, particularly in its **location**, which received the highest score. Professors and facilities also earned strong marks. While overall student life and internationality are well-regarded, **accommodation** stands out as the area with the lowest, though still positive, rating. The value proposition is considered perfect.
The vast majority of reviews (98%) are positive, highlighting modern methodologies, practical case-based learning, and networking opportunities. A small percentage of negative feedback (2%) mentioned issues with course scheduling and administration.
~74% of reviews are positive, highlighting practical learning and networking. Approximately 8% are negative, citing disorganization, basic education, and unhelpful staff.
Most reviews are positive, highlighting good educational foundations and opportunities. However, about 33.3% of feedback is negative, citing issues with teaching quality and program recognition.
With a ~100% positive rating, reviews highlight exceptional experiences, transformative professional growth, and excellent faculty. Students praise the welcoming culture, global diversity, and strong career connections. No negative feedback was recorded.
Nearly 83% of reviews are positive, highlighting internationality, relevant projects, and technology focus. One review (~17%) criticizes outdated architectural programs and facilities.
With an average rating of 4.11/5 from 54 reviews, ~85% are positive, highlighting complete degrees, practical projects with companies, and quality teaching. A very small amount (~2%) of feedback was negative.
All 9 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.78/5. Students highly recommend ENEB for its flexibility, comprehensive curriculum, and valuable additional courses.
International Immersion: Transformative Leadership for Future Challenges – Program Review I had the opportunity to participate in the International Immersion program at EADA Business School, Barcelona, spending a month at the Barcelona campus and an additional week at the Collbató campus. The overall experience was highly enriching and impactful. The classroom sessions at the Barcelona campus were exceptionally interactive and engaging. The learning environment encouraged open dialogue, collaborative thinking, and the exchange of diverse perspectives among participants from different backgrounds. This significantly enhanced the depth of discussions and contributed to a well-rounded learning experience. The Collbató campus offered a distinctly immersive environment, combining experiential learning with outdoor activities. This setting complemented the academic sessions by fostering teamwork, reflection, and leadership development in a more informal yet highly effective context. Overall, the program was a valuable learning journey. While the immediate experience was positive, its true impact has become more evident over time. It has contributed meaningfully to my personal and professional development, particularly in enhancing my leadership perspective, cross-cultural understanding, and ability to navigate complex, real-world challenges.
Although I earned my bachelor degree at the University of York in UK, it was quite theoretical. I really started to bridge the learning gap between theory and practice only when I started to pursue my master degree in Business Analytics and Data Science at EU Business School in Barcelona. What stands out most in my current program is the university’s strong emphasis on practical experience. Our professors are not only scholars but also are successful business managers and data experts, as they are either the owners of successful organizations or individuals who took on top management roles in large corporations. Their teachings are more than just the syllabus in, they also provide personal experience in the area of niche markets, provide best practices in an industry, and always provoke our thinking with regard to the existing trends in higher education, business strategy, and innovation.
It's embarrassing that they call themselves a school. They're a company that wants to take your money without providing any education nor a recognized degree. The "teachers" are businessmen without any teaching qualification and without the know-how, the classes were boring and the forum structure is pointless. Save yourself and study somewhere else!
Being at IESE was one of the best experiences of my life: 1- Professionally: this MBA is one of the best connected schools with top consultancy and banking sectors. for example, the 3 MBBs come to the school to train and interview candidates, ensuring a higher successful rate. It allowed me to jump from a civil engineering position to work for McKinsey. 2- Personal and cultural : amazing transformative 2 years, with people from all over the world (73 nationalities in my class) with great values. Totally worthy it.
Nothing to show
Worst university ever, I’m an İNTERNATİONAL student who came just for one semester for ERASMUS from another institution. It was the worst experience ever in my life, Esic university treated me so badly. The ERASMUS coordinator is really disrespectful and he didn’t even do a welcoming day for the new students. We didn’t get any training on how we can adapt to the university's system. First, they told us it is a hybrid system, which is not the case. This is the first lie from a higher education institution. They are really trying to push me to fail administration and also teachers I really feel it’s a religious problem about where I come from , plus I did all of my exams perfectly. Now I’m surprised that one teacher wants me to fail because I didn’t do one exercise ( just one in all semester lol) , my exam was perfect now she doesn’t want to show me my results and told me that she will make me fail because of one exercise. It is not fair and no one from the administration wants to help me as an Erasmus student, but I feel there is a difference between me and Spanish nationalities. Now I will take my legal right. They really discriminated against me in every way I’m really sad how I got used and treated this badly and also this issue has now become a personal issue, I really don’t recommend any İNTERNATİONAL students to join ESIC Valencia it’s the worst university on planet earth 😡
I highly recommend the Master’s in Project Management course at ENEB for anyone considering a career in this field. The course is entirely online, making it convenient for those with busy schedules, and it includes valuable additional courses like Business English and specialized modules from Harvard Business School. The quality of the material is veri high and very comprehensive, providing a strong foundation for beginner project managers or those who are just starting to explore this field. It’s also well-suited for small business owners looking to develop strategic planning skills. Overall, a great choice for gaining practical, applicable knowledge in project management!
