Warwick Business School - WBS vs Glasgow Caledonian University vs Cass Business School vs INSEEC Business School vs European School of Economics - ESE

Side-by-side comparison from 245 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Warwick Business School - WBS: wins 5/7 categories
Glasgow Caledonian University: wins 0/7 categories
Cass Business School: wins 1/7 categories
INSEEC Business School: wins 0/7 categories
European School of Economics - ESE: wins 1/7 categories
1Training: wins 0/7 categories
eTrain: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Coventry, The United Kingdom
4.40
Read more reviews
44 reviews
×
Best programme: Business Management
London, The United Kingdom
4.40
Read more reviews
138 reviews
×
Best programme: Business Management
London, The United Kingdom
4.50
Read more reviews
10 reviews
×
Best programme: Business Management
Best programme: Digital Marketing
London, The United Kingdom
4.50
Read more reviews
39 reviews
×
Best programme: Business Administration
London, The United Kingdom
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
London, The United Kingdom
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
4.57
Win
4.44
4.33
3.43
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Location
4.24
4.75
4.44
4.64
4.79
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
4.57
Win
4.33
4.40
3.86
4.44
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
4.60
Win
4.52
4.30
4.50
4.51
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
4.63
Win
4.36
4.33
4.07
4.43
Not rated
Not rated
Value
4.31
4.49
4.50
Win
3.64
4.31
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
4.46
Win
3.93
4.00
2.50
4.11
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Exceptional, practical, and rigorous academic programs
  • +Supportive and engaging faculty dedicated to student success
  • +Global learning environment and vibrant community
  • +Strong employability focus and employer links
  • +Well-designed, modern campus facilities
  • +Supportive learning environment and accessible faculty
  • +Engaging professors and effective teaching methods
  • +Diverse student body and valuable networking opportunities
  • +Strong career services and diverse program specializations
  • +Practical, group-focused learning and professional initiation.
  • +High-quality teaching and supportive faculty mentorship.
  • +Strong professional network and vibrant student life.
  • +International relevance & practical/hands-on experience
  • +Welcoming & supportive environment with friendly, helpful staff/faculty
  • +Diverse, small classes with experienced professors

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Students dislike the administrative and management issues.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are major complaints.
  • -Lack of engagement and irrelevant course content frustrate students.
  • -Program content lacks practical business skills and focus on "hard facts."
  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Facility issues, particularly with outdated labs, cause frustration.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Communication and transparency are frequently lacking.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance.
  • -Lack of student support and responsiveness from administration.
  • -Uninspiring curriculum and teaching methods.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are often criticized.
  • -Poor teaching quality and unengaging course content are commonly cited.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Student feedback indicates a generally positive university experience, with **Student Life** standing out as the highest-rated aspect. **Facilities** and **Professors** also received very strong scores. Conversely, **Location** emerged as the weakest area, though still rated favorably. **Value** is also moderately lower compared to other metrics.

An assessment of the university reveals exceptionally high ratings, particularly in **Location** (4.75) and **Internationality** (4.52). The university also scores well in **Facilities**, **Student Life**, and **Value**. The area receiving the lowest score is **Accomodation** (3.93), indicating this as the weakest point in the overall evaluation.

This university garners excellent reviews across most aspects. Its strongest areas are clearly **Location** and **Value**, both scoring a high 4.44 and 4.5 respectively. Professors and student life also receive very positive marks. The weakest area identified is **Accomodation**, which, while still good, sits at a 4.0, slightly below the other categories. Internationality and Facilities are also well-regarded.

This university demonstrates notable strengths in its **Location**, receiving a high rating of 4.64. **Student Life** and **Internationality** are also well-regarded. Conversely, **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest area, with a significantly lower score of 2.5. Other aspects like **Facilities**, **Professors**, and **Value** fall within a moderate to good range.

Student feedback indicates strong satisfaction across several aspects of university life. Location stands out as the highest-rated area, with internationality and professors also receiving excellent marks. While student life and value are also highly regarded, facilities represent the weakest area among the surveyed categories. Overall, the institution demonstrates a solid performance with clear strengths in its external and academic offerings.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

Nearly all 44 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.41/5. Students highlight world-class, rigorous, and practical education, exceptional and supportive faculty, and a globally diverse community.

With 138 reviews averaging 4.42 stars, ~93% praise strong employer links, career focus, and supportive learning environments. A small fraction (~0.7%) noted curriculum gaps.

With an average rating of 4.5/5 from 10 reviews, ~90% are positive, highlighting knowledgeable professors, engaging teaching, and valuable career opportunities. No negative feedback was reported.

Most student feedback is positive (~63% 4-5 stars), highlighting excellent pedagogy, practical experiences, and supportive staff. The average rating is 3.81/5, with no negative reviews.

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~95% of feedback highlighting an engaging, internationally relevant learning experience and a welcoming environment. Students appreciate practical learning, helpful staff, and international class settings. No negative feedback was recorded.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
48%
51%
60%
21%
59%
0%
0%
4★
45%
40%
30%
50%
36%
0%
0%
3★
7%
8%
10%
43%
5%
0%
0%
2★
0%
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Learning in a practical way

This university has a lot of qualities such as adapting to students in order to optimize learning, and the desire to confront the student as quickly as possible with the world of work. On the other hand, I would criticize this school for poorly disseminated information and a gloomy community life.

The amazing professors/teachers there!

First of all since my campus was in the heart of Rome, the place and inside of the university was like a whole museum. I love how friendly and helpful the staff was, the professors were one in a million. I love how they did all their best to tell us about the subjects in detail and in a fun way with examples for us to get into it more. I liked how they make time and engage in it and actually help us to teach us, so it was all in one reading writing with our own brain and infos searching for the sources by ourselves listening but also being able to express our own way of knowledge on the topics!

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close