EDHEC Business School vs Audencia Business School vs ONCAMPUS Global vs EM Normandie - EM Normandie vs Excelia Business School

Side-by-side comparison from 180 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: ONCAMPUS Global (4.80)
EDHEC Business School: wins 0/7 categories
Audencia Business School: wins 0/7 categories
ONCAMPUS Global: wins 4/7 categories
EM Normandie - EM Normandie: wins 0/7 categories
Excelia Business School: wins 0/7 categories
EMLV Business School: wins 1/7 categories
Schiller International University: wins 2/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Business Administration in Management
Best programme: Master in Management
London, The United Kingdom
4.80
Top
Read more reviews
20 reviews
×
Best programme: Undergraduate Foundation Programme
Best programme: MSc International Logistics and Port Management
La Rochelle, France
4.10
Read more reviews
61 reviews
×
Best programme: Master of Science (MSc)
Best programme: International Business
Tampa, Florida, United States
4.60
Read more reviews
14 reviews
×
Best programme: BA International Relations and Diplomacy
Category ratings
Facilities
4.23
3.98
4.44
4.13
3.97
4.80
Win
3.92
Location
3.77
4.06
4.74
3.75
4.27
4.89
4.93
Win
Professors
4.32
4.13
4.75
Win
4.13
3.93
4.20
4.64
Internationality
4.45
4.39
4.60
4.13
4.30
4.20
4.93
Win
Student life
4.13
3.99
4.56
Win
3.63
4.25
4.10
4.15
Value
4.06
4.13
4.50
Win
4.13
3.93
4.00
4.29
Accommodation
3.21
3.58
4.32
Win
3.57
3.59
4.00
3.62
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Outstanding teaching quality and practical, employer-aligned courses
  • +Strong corporate network and valuable career services
  • +Rigorous academics with practical industry insights
  • +Excellent teachers and diverse international community
  • +Great facilities and well-structured classes
  • +Supportive learning environment and city amenities
  • +Supportive and knowledgeable faculty
  • +Excellent facilities and convenient location
  • +Strong academic and personal development support
  • +Practical, industry-relevant courses and inspiring professors
  • +Rich international environment and diverse student body
  • +Personal and professional development opportunities
  • +Diverse, multicultural environment and global opportunities
  • +High-quality teaching and practical, well-structured curriculum
  • +Strong alumni network and enriching student experience
  • +Career-oriented programs and professional focus
  • +Multicultural and international environment
  • +Modern facilities and relevant courses
  • +Diverse student and educator backgrounds
  • +Opportunities for personal and career growth
  • +Supportive and organized academic environment
Cons
  • -High tuition fees and perceived poor value for money are a major concern.
  • -Limited practical training and theory-heavy courses.
  • -Unresponsive professors and resistance to feedback.
  • -Lack of student interaction and networking opportunities.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor upkeep frustrate students.
  • -Lack of resources and inadequate support services are common complaints.
  • -Financial concerns and perceived low educational value.
  • -Superficial course content and lack of practical value were disappointing.
  • -The program's focus did not align with student expectations or career goals.
  • -High tuition costs were not justified by the perceived quality of education and career support.
  • -Administrative and management issues caused significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources were a common complaint.
  • -The curriculum lacked practical relevance and current industry updates.
  • -Limited extracurriculars and career opportunities.
  • -Poor quality of facilities and overall environment.
  • -Lack of academic rigor and student engagement.
Rating summary
What students say

The university excels in Internationality with a rating of 4.45, closely followed by its Professors at 4.32 and Facilities at 4.23. Student Life and Value also receive positive marks. Conversely, Accomodation presents the weakest area, scoring 3.21, with Location also being a moderate concern at 3.77. Overall, the institution demonstrates strengths in its academic and global offerings, while areas concerning student living arrangements and campus surroundings could see improvement.

This university garners strong marks for its **Internationality**, receiving a high rating of 4.385. Professors and Value also score well at 4.125. Areas like Facilities and Student Life are generally positive, hovering around 4.0. The weakest area is **Accomodation**, with a rating of 3.579, indicating it could benefit from improvement compared to other aspects of the university experience.

Overall, the university garners strong ratings across various aspects. Professors are exceptionally well-regarded, achieving the highest score. Location and Internationality also stand out with excellent marks. Student Life, Facilities, and Value also reflect positive sentiment. Accommodation, while still strong, receives the lowest rating among the surveyed categories.

This institution garners excellent marks in several key areas. Facilities, Professors, Internationality, and Value all received high scores of 4.125. Student Life and Accommodations are rated lower, at 3.625 and approximately 3.57 respectively, indicating these are areas with more room for improvement compared to its other strengths. The Location score sits at 3.75.

Internationality, Location, and Student Life emerge as the university's strongest attributes, each scoring above 4.25. The university also received a solid rating for its facilities and professors. Conversely, accommodation presents the weakest area, with a score of 3.59. Overall, the university demonstrates a well-rounded profile with notable strengths in student experience and international appeal.

This university garners excellent marks for its facilities and location, both receiving near-perfect scores. Student life, accommodation, and value for money are rated solidly at 4.0. Professors and internationality are also well-regarded, averaging 4.2. Overall, the university demonstrates a strong performance, with its physical environment and accessibility standing out as its most impressive attributes.

The university exhibits exceptional strengths in its location and internationality, both scoring a near-perfect 4.93. Professors also receive high marks at 4.64, complemented by strong student life (4.15) and value (4.29). The weakest areas are facilities, rated at 3.92, and accommodation, which received a 3.62.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4.25/5 from 48 reviews, ~74% of feedback is positive. Students highlight outstanding teaching quality, practical courses, strong industry alignment, and excellent career services/alumni networks. One negative review mentioned high tuition fees.

Nearly all (95%) of 20 university reviews are positive, praising the learning environment, great facilities, and good teachers. A single negative review cited disappointment with practical tool training and professor engagement.

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~100% of 20 feedback entries rating 4–5 stars. Students praise friendly, supportive teachers, excellent facilities like the library, and effective student support services that build confidence.

Most reviews praise the inspiring professors, practical learning, and international environment, contributing to a ~74% positive sentiment. One review expressed dissatisfaction, calling it a money-making scheme with mediocre teaching.

~95% of reviews are positive, highlighting multicultural environments, enriching experiences, and good quality teaching. A small portion of feedback (~5%) expresses disappointment with academic depth and practical value.

Most reviews (80%) are positive, praising career-oriented programs and professors. A small portion of feedback (10%) highlights administrative management issues. The average rating is 4/5.

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with 13 out of 14 (93%) giving high ratings. Students praise the diverse educators and peer networks, cultural exposure, and opportunities for personal and academic growth. A small percentage of feedback (around 7%) mentions a lack of extracurricular activities and internship availability for earlier years.

Rating distribution
5★
38%
30%
75%
38%
33%
30%
71%
4★
53%
65%
25%
38%
52%
50%
21%
3★
9%
0%
0%
13%
11%
10%
0%
2★
2%
5%
0%
0%
3%
10%
7%
1★
0%
0%
0%
13%
2%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Enriching Experience

I absolutely love everything about EDHEC, beginning from the pedagogy to the atmosphere it provides to the students (especially international) on campus. The extracurricular activities like sports, associations are very helpful. Also, the career service provided is top-notch. Therefore, I would call it an enriching experience so far.

Focus on multicultural business management

I have been quite satisfied by the quality of teaching at Audencia. The lecturers and professors are knowledgeable and place an emphasis on professionalism and leveraging culture in business dealings.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Poor administration

We were promised good internship programs, however we are left to fend for ourselves where we have to find everything on our own with little to no guidance from the bigger authorities. A little disappointing

The cultural mix and the great atmosphere.

I loved being at Schiller in Heidelberg. The setting and the city were very serene and the exposure to all those students and teachers from such different and diverse backgrounds was a great learning experience. Additionally, the ease of accessing the Schiller campuses in the other countries was a great additional bonus to studying at Schiller. I would most definitely recommend Schiller to other students who are looking for a very culturally fulfilling experience.

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close