Universidad de Granada - UGR vs Technical University of Berlin - TU Berlin vs Universidad Nacional Experimental Politécnica Antonio José de Sucre - UNEXPO vs ISBAT University - ISBAT vs Sumbawa University Of Technology - UTS
Side-by-side comparison from 163 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Strong academic level and knowledgeable professors
- +Vibrant city, culture, and affordability
- +Positive student-teacher relationships and social atmosphere
- +Expert and supportive faculty
- +Practical application and research focus
- +Flexible learning and vibrant student life
- +High academic standards and rigorous curriculum
- +Supportive and experienced faculty for professional development
- +Specialized engineering programs with excellent facilities
- +Diverse technology and computer science courses
- +Flexible payment options
- +Multicultural learning environment
- +Abundant scholarships and accommodation options
- +Strong academic achievements and learning opportunities
- +Positive and wonderful student experiences
Nothing to show
- +Practical, skill-focused learning with supportive staff
- +Affordable tuition and vibrant campus environment
- +Innovative programs and opportunities for personal growth
- -Administrative & management issues cause disorganization and lack of student consideration.
- -Poor teaching quality and outdated academic practices are prevalent.
- -Exam scheduling and distribution of holidays are poorly managed.
- -Administrative and management issues are frequently cited.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a common complaint.
- -Lack of effective teaching and support is a recurring problem.
- -Students dislike administrative and management issues.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are frequent complaints.
- -Overcrowded classes and insufficient resources frustrate students.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are major concerns.
- -Administrative and management issues create significant frustration.
- -Lack of resources and support hinder academic progress.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder the learning experience.
- -A lack of clear communication and support from staff is common.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent disruptions.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment are a persistent problem.
- -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant and lacking practical application.
This institution receives its highest marks for Student Life, with a score of 4.59, closely followed by its Location and Internationality. Conversely, the university's weakest areas are Professors and Facilities, both scoring around 3.64 and 3.65 respectively. Accomodation and Value also show solid, above-average performance.
With an overall rating of 4, this institution demonstrates commendable strengths in **Internationality** (4.22) and **Student Life** (4.06), alongside solid scores for **Professors** and **Value**. Its **Accomodation** presents the area with the lowest score (3.71), suggesting potential for improvement in this aspect.
This institution presents a notable profile, with its strongest area being **Value** at 4.67. Areas such as **Facilities** and **Accommodation** represent its weakest points, both scoring a 3. Other aspects like Professors, Location, Student Life, and Internationality fall within a moderate to good range.
With excellent scores across most aspects, this university truly shines in its **facilities**, earning a perfect 5. Its **location** also garners high marks at 4.5. Conversely, **accommodation** is the area with the most room for improvement, receiving a 3. Overall, the institution offers a well-rounded experience, supported by solid ratings in professors, student life, internationality, and value.
Overall, the university garners excellent feedback, particularly excelling in **Professors, Student Life, Internationality, and Value**, all receiving perfect scores. Its **Facilities, Location, and Accommodation** are also well-regarded, each earning a strong four out of five. The university's most significant strengths lie in its academic and social offerings, alongside its global appeal and cost-effectiveness.
Nothing to show
This institution receives particularly strong marks for its **Location** and **Value**, both scoring 4.5. **Professors** are also highly regarded at 4.25. Areas showing room for improvement include **Internationality**, with a rating of 3.75. Other aspects like Facilities, Student Life, and Accommodation are rated solidly at 4.
~74% of reviews are positive, highlighting academics, affordability, and the enriching city experience. Approximately 14% of feedback is negative, citing disorganization and administrative issues.
With a 4/5 average rating from 19 reviews, students praise strong academics, particularly in STEM fields, and appreciate research focus and practical application. Positive feedback highlights well-prepared professors and diverse learning opportunities. No negative feedback was reported.
All 3 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 5/5. Students praise the academic excellence, skilled teachers, and specialized engineering programs. There is no negative feedback.
Based on two reviews, both positive, the university is praised for its diverse technology-related computer science courses with installment payment options. It also offers a great learning environment, numerous opportunities, and a culturally diverse climate.
With a perfect 5/5 average rating, this university is highly praised. Students highlight numerous scholarship opportunities and positive dormitory experiences, contributing to overall wonderful experiences.
Nothing to show
All four reviews are positive, giving an average rating of 4.5/5. Students highlight practical learning, supportive lecturers, and affordable tuition as key strengths.
The academic content of the master has been very interesting to me and I think I have learned a lot. Coordination I think it can improve since in the subjects taught by more than one teacher I have identified a lack of coherence. In relation to the practices, several problems have arisen since, when working with the juvenile protection or penal system, on several occasions it has taken more than the appropriate period to accept the practices. Also the list of centers that were offered last year, at which point I had to choose, this year they were not offered. However, the content of the master seems very good to me.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
