SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities vs WSB University - WSB vs Lazarski University vs Zabielski Foundation vs VIZJA University

Side-by-side comparison from 207 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: University of Engineering and Health in Warsaw - WSIiZ (5.00)
SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities: wins 0/7 categories
WSB University - WSB: wins 0/7 categories
Lazarski University: wins 4/7 categories
Zabielski Foundation: wins 0/7 categories
VIZJA University: wins 0/7 categories
University of Engineering and Health in Warsaw - WSIiZ: wins 3/7 categories
Warsaw School Of Computer Science - WSCS: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Applied Psychology
Best programme: Bachelor in International Logistics Management
Warsaw, Poland
4.50
Read more reviews
112 reviews
×
Best programme: Business Management
Warsaw, Poland
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Warsaw, Poland
4.20
Read more reviews
43 reviews
×
Best programme: Psychology
Best programme: Cosmetology
Category ratings
Facilities
4.25
4.00
4.61
Not rated
4.16
5.00
Win
Not rated
Location
4.04
4.55
4.56
Not rated
4.33
5.00
Win
Not rated
Professors
4.32
4.18
4.57
Win
Not rated
4.19
4.50
Not rated
Internationality
4.18
4.27
4.63
Win
Not rated
4.23
3.00
Not rated
Student life
3.59
3.70
4.46
Not rated
3.92
4.50
Win
Not rated
Value
4.04
4.09
4.62
Win
Not rated
3.93
4.50
Not rated
Accommodation
3.44
3.64
3.87
Win
Not rated
3.60
3.00
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Passionate and knowledgeable lecturers
  • +Well-organized and relevant programs
  • +Positive learning environment and resources
  • +Practical, career-focused programmes with real-world skills
  • +Supportive and approachable lecturers and staff
  • +Flexible learning formats and opportunities for personal development
  • +Excellent teachers and practical, real-world learning
  • +Engaging and supportive learning environment
  • +Modern facilities and international community

Nothing to show

  • +Strong academic programs and accreditations
  • +Commitment to student development and success
  • +Practical learning through internships and workshops
  • +Strong practical focus and modern facilities
  • +Supportive learning environment with good people and lecturers
  • +Relevant, industry-aligned curriculum

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues are a significant concern.
  • -Poor organization and communication among staff lead to problems.
  • -Lack of adequate academic structure and support is evident.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Course content is often irrelevant or poorly delivered.
  • -Poor organization and unqualified instructors are a major concern.
  • -A lack of English proficiency among the student body hinders integration.
  • -Inadequate student support systems are a recurring problem.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and registration errors cause significant hassle and unexpected costs.
  • -Poor teaching quality and lack of engaging learning environments are prevalent.
  • -Inadequate student support, including limited facilities and poor communication, detracts from the experience.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a common source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources are frequently criticized.
  • -Inconsistent course quality and teaching effectiveness are a recurring concern.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution presents a strong academic profile, with exceptional ratings for its professors and facilities. Location and internationality also score well. Student life and accommodation represent areas with lower, though still respectable, scores compared to other aspects. The overall value for money is perceived positively, aligning with the location rating.

This university scores highly in several key areas, with location and internationality being particularly strong points. Student life and accommodation received the lowest ratings among the surveyed categories. Facilities and value for money are also well-regarded, while professors are rated favorably as well.

An excellent performance is evident across several key areas for this university. Its strongest areas are Internationality (4.63), Facilities (4.61), and Value (4.62), indicating a highly positive student experience in these aspects. Professors and Location also receive very strong scores. The weakest area appears to be Accomodation, with a rating of 3.87, suggesting room for improvement in this particular category.

Nothing to show

An overall positive assessment emerges from these university ratings, with the institution excelling in **Location** (4.37) and **Internationality** (4.24). **Facilities** and **Professors** also receive high marks, both scoring approximately 4.17. The areas receiving the lowest scores are **Accomodation** (3.59), indicating room for improvement in this aspect, followed by **Student Life** and **Value**, both rated around 3.9.

This institution excels in several key areas, boasting perfect scores for **Facilities** and **Location**. **Professors**, **Student Life**, and **Value** also received highly positive marks. Conversely, **Accomodation** and **Internationality** represent the weakest aspects, scoring a moderate three out of five. The university offers a compelling package, particularly for those prioritizing campus resources and its prime setting.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

Nearly all reviews are positive, praising passionate lecturers and well-organized programs. A small percentage of feedback mentions concerns about program structure and course coordination.

With an average rating of 4/5 based on 11 reviews, ~73% of feedback is positive. Students highlight practical, student-friendly learning environments, approachable lecturers, and opportunities for personal development and internships. No negative feedback was reported.

With ~92% of 112 reviews being positive, students praise facilities, experienced teachers, and practical learning. A single negative review noted disorganization and an unsupportive student body.

Nothing to show

With a 4.19/5 rating from 42 reviews, approximately 86% highlight positive aspects like university development, program quality, and organized processes. A small ~5% of feedback points to issues with administrative errors and a perceived lack of student immersion.

With an average rating of 5/5 based on two reviews, feedback is overwhelmingly positive. Students praise the rigorous academics, practical experience, modern facilities, and the alignment of the curriculum with industry trends.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
44%
27%
64%
0%
42%
100%
0%
4★
49%
45%
27%
0%
44%
0%
0%
3★
3%
27%
8%
0%
9%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
5%
0%
1%
0%
5%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Practical and modern

Overall, i would rate programme at SWPS positively. What stands out the most is the practical approach to lerning. Many lectures have real professional expierience and often explain topics throhu examples from thier field, not only through theory or slides. The atmosphere is modern, open and quite relaxed, wich makes it easier to feel comfortable as a student. I also like that the university encourages independent thinking and discussion. However the organization could be better, especially considering the tuition fees. Some classes feel more useful and better prepared than others.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Arts and Culture

The art studios are equipped with the necessary tools and materials for creative expression. The school auditorium hosts various cultural events and performances, providing a platform for students to showcase their talents.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close