Dublin City University - DCU vs Trinity College Dublin - TCD vs EM Normandie - EM Normandie vs Trinity Business School vs Learning People

Side-by-side comparison from 142 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Trinity Business School (5.00)
Dublin City University - DCU: wins 0/7 categories
Trinity College Dublin - TCD: wins 2/7 categories
EM Normandie - EM Normandie: wins 0/7 categories
Trinity Business School: wins 4/7 categories
Learning People: wins 0/7 categories
Technological University Dublin: wins 1/7 categories
Royal College of Physicians of Ireland: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Accounting and Finance
Best programme: Computer Science
Best programme: MSc International Logistics and Port Management
5.00
Top
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Business Economics and Social Science (BESS)
Dublin, Ireland
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Mechanical Engineering
Category ratings
Facilities
4.27
4.07
4.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
3.69
Not rated
Location
3.75
4.60
Win
3.57
4.00
Not rated
4.19
Not rated
Professors
4.35
4.26
4.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.38
Not rated
Internationality
4.18
4.23
4.14
4.00
Not rated
4.31
Win
Not rated
Student life
4.24
4.27
3.71
5.00
Win
Not rated
3.44
Not rated
Value
4.30
4.39
Win
4.00
4.00
Not rated
4.13
Not rated
Accommodation
4.07
3.36
3.50
5.00
Win
Not rated
2.94
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Dedicated and supportive lecturers
  • +Welcoming and friendly student community
  • +Positive and smooth overall university experience
  • +High-quality teaching and supportive lecturers
  • +Beautiful campus and convenient location
  • +Rich academic atmosphere and flexible course options
  • +Connecting theory to practice through real-world cases.
  • +Diverse international environment and global opportunities.
  • +Relevant industry-focused courses and knowledgeable faculty.
  • +Strong sense of community and inclusive environment
  • +Opportunities for networking and professional growth
  • +Supportive and collaborative atmosphere

Nothing to show

  • +Practical, hands-on learning with real-world applications.
  • +Broad, interdisciplinary courses fostering transferable skills.
  • +Engaging, supportive lecturers and modern facilities.

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause constant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources are major drawbacks.
  • -Ineffective teaching methods and insufficient support hinder learning.
  • -Administrative and management issues caused frustration and inefficiency.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hindered learning experiences.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from faculty and staff was a recurring problem.
  • -Perceived as a money-making scheme with mediocre teaching.
  • -Administrative & management issues
  • -Outdated facilities
  • -Lack of resources & support

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning experiences.
  • -Lack of effective communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This university garners favorable ratings across most aspects, with **Professors** and **Value** standing out as the strongest areas, both scoring above 4.3. **Facilities** and **Student Life** also receive high marks, exceeding 4.2. **Accomodation** and **Internationality** are well-regarded, with scores around 4.0 and 4.1 respectively. The **Location** is the weakest performing category, though still respectable at 3.75.

This university garners excellent scores, particularly excelling in **Location** (4.6) and **Student Life** (4.27). Professors are also highly regarded (4.26), with strong internationality (4.23) and value (4.39). The weakest area, however, is **Accomodation**, which received a significantly lower rating (3.36). Facilities also scored moderately well (4.07).

This institution performs well across most aspects, with **Internationality** standing out as its strongest area. Facilities, Professors, and Value also receive high marks. Areas for potential improvement include **Location**, which scored the lowest, and Accomodation. Student life and the overall value proposition are rated solidly in the mid-to-high range.

Exceptional marks are awarded for **Facilities**, **Professors**, **Student Life**, and **Accommodation**, all receiving a perfect score. The university also fares well in **Internationality** and **Value**, both rated a solid 4. The **Location** is its least high-scoring aspect, though still considered good at a 4.

Nothing to show

Examining the provided ratings, the university excels in areas like **Professors** and **Internationality**, both scoring well over 4.0. **Location** and **Value** also present strong points for the institution. Conversely, **Accomodation** received the lowest score, indicating a significant area for improvement. **Student Life** and **Facilities** fall in the mid-range, suggesting moderate satisfaction in these aspects.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With a 4.49 average rating from 61 reviews, ~100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight excellent lecturers, a welcoming community, and a positive academic experience.

The university receives strong positive feedback (~86%), with students praising excellent teacher resources, academic achievements, and teaching quality. Many also highlight a beautiful campus and convenient location, with lecturers being knowledgeable and supportive. No negative reviews were recorded.

Most reviews (approximately 71%) highlight a positive learning atmosphere, inspiring professors, and valuable international experiences. A small amount of feedback (around 14%) suggests mediocrity and a focus on profit. The average rating is 3.86/5.

With a perfect 5/5 average rating, the single review highlights a strong sense of community and a supportive, inclusive environment. Positive feedback emphasizes networking and personal/professional growth opportunities.

Nothing to show

Around 93% of reviews are positive, highlighting a practical approach, engaging lecturers, and valuable real-world skills. No negative reviews were recorded.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
51%
32%
43%
100%
0%
31%
0%
4★
48%
54%
29%
0%
0%
50%
0%
3★
2%
14%
14%
0%
0%
19%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
14%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close