University of Toronto - UofT vs University of British Columbia vs Simon Fraser University vs University Canada West - UCW vs Thompson Rivers University - TRU
Side-by-side comparison from 667 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Excellent academics, world-class professors, and diverse program options
- +Strong reputation, prestigious school, and networking opportunities
- +Welcoming community, helpful staff, and accessible campus amenities
- +Excellent academics and experienced faculty
- +Valuable career preparation and practical learning
- +Great campus resources and vibrant student life
- +Challenging, in-depth academic content and expert faculty.
- +Opportunities for hands-on experience and diverse program options.
- +A focused learning environment with access to great resources.
- +Practical, career-focused programs with experienced faculty
- +Affordable tuition and internationally recognized certifications
- +Diverse and well-structured learning environment
- +Small class sizes and dedicated professors
- +Valuable, practical courses and personal growth opportunities
- +Supportive, inclusive, and beautiful campus environment
- +Practical, hands-on learning and real-world applications
- +Supportive and approachable instructors with clear explanations
- +Excellent facilities and opportunities for engagement
- +Flexible pacing and online learning
- +Supportive instructors and helpful feedback
- -Administrative and management issues plague student services and support.
- -The focus on research overshadows practical learning and career preparation.
- -Student life and wellness are unsatisfactory due to high competitiveness and lack of resources.
- -Administrative and course selection issues are a significant frustration.
- -Some professors and classes are subpar, with arbitrary grading.
- -Social experiences outside of clubs can be disappointing.
- -Poor course management and a negative atmosphere.
- -Uninspired and biased course content.
- -Administrative & management issues are a frequent complaint.
- -Facilities are often described as outdated or in poor condition.
- -Communication from the institution is perceived as lacking or unclear.
- -Outdated facilities and poor parking.
- -Inconsistent professor quality and basic course content for advanced studies.
- -Overpriced housing in the surrounding area.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
- -Lack of resources and support are common complaints.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning and comfort.
- -Course content and teaching methods are often perceived as uninspiring or irrelevant.
With a diverse set of ratings, this institution excels particularly in **Internationality**, scoring a high 4.41. **Location** is also a significant strength at 4.38, followed closely by **Value** at 4.24. The most notable area for improvement appears to be **Student Life**, which received the lowest rating at 3.80, closely followed by **Accomodation** at 3.85. Other categories like Facilities and Professors are rated solidly above average.
This institution demonstrates a commendable performance across several key areas. Its strongest suit is location, achieving a high rating of 4.45. Student life and internationality also receive positive marks, both above 4.3. The weakest area identified is accommodation, with a rating of 3.86. Other aspects like facilities, professors, and value fall within a solid range, generally around the 4.0 to 4.2 mark.
Offering a generally positive outlook, the university excels particularly in **Internationality**, achieving its highest rating. **Professors** also garnered significant acclaim. Conversely, **Student Life** received the lowest score, indicating an area for potential improvement, though other aspects like Facilities, Location, Accommodation, and Value remain at respectable levels.
This institution receives excellent marks in several key areas, particularly excelling in **Location** (4.51) and **Internationality** (4.36). **Facilities**, **Professors**, **Student Life**, and **Value** also score positively, all above 4.1. The primary area for improvement seems to be **Accomodation**, which received a significantly lower rating of 3.35 compared to the other metrics.
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in several areas, with Professors, Location, and Value all receiving very high marks. Student Life and Internationality are also rated positively. However, the university's Facilities and Accommodations are its weakest points, showing significantly lower scores compared to other evaluated aspects.
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in academic areas, with Professors receiving a high rating of 4.42 and Internationality also scoring well at 4.32. Facilities and Location are similarly well-regarded. Student Life and Accommodations, however, present areas for potential improvement, with ratings of 3.94 and 3.44 respectively. Overall value is rated at a solid 4.0.
This institution excels in several key areas, with top marks awarded for Location, Internationality, and Value. Student Life and Facilities received more moderate scores, suggesting areas for potential improvement. The university also demonstrates strong performance in Professors and Accomodation, indicating a generally well-rounded educational experience.
Students praise an excellent academic environment with knowledgeable professors and diverse opportunities. The university holds a strong reputation, particularly in research. Limited negative feedback (~1.6%) briefly mentions student services, high competitiveness, and course memorization.
With ~83% positive reviews, students praise demanding academics, supportive resources, and career preparation. A small minority note challenges with course selection and professor engagement.
With ~80% positive reviews and an average rating of 4.07/5, students praise academic challenges, knowledgeable professors, and strong program options like co-op. A small amount of negative feedback mentioned poor organization and atmosphere.
With a high average rating of 4.16/5, ~84% of reviews are positive, highlighting practical programs, experienced professors, and a diverse environment. No negative feedback was provided.
With an average rating of 4.1/5 from 29 reviews, ~93% of feedback is positive, highlighting valuable courses, small class sizes, supportive professors, and personal growth opportunities. A small fraction (~7%) of negative comments cite issues with some basic courses and registration processes.
Most students find the university's practical, hands-on learning and supportive professors highly beneficial. Excellent facilities and career-focused courses are frequently praised. There is no reported negative feedback.
The single review is overwhelmingly positive (100% positive sentiment). Students appreciate the flexibility of self-paced learning and the option to work on schoolwork alongside other commitments.
The program itself is great and really prepares you for an academic career, but the quality of the supervisors varies a lot. Some people in the department are excellent and enjoy empowering their students, but the majority of profs make you feel like they're doing you a favour by giving you their time of day/guidance. Might be an issue exclusively with this department, but still. And the campus is cool! Great cheap eats around. Shout out to El Rey for when you want to splurge a bit and get some awesome tacos!
I was there as an exchange student from Europe, attending classes at Sauder Business School and the Mechanical Engineering Department. Studying at UBC is definitely a mixed bag in terms of the quality of education. I did have a few great professors who held wonderfully challenging and well-thought-out classes, making me feel that UBC punches above its weight in terms of educational quality. However, some other lectures were undoubtedly subpar. Grading seemed quite arbitrary at times (moving goalposts seems to be a recurring theme at UBC), and the lectures were not nearly as good as they should have been, in my opinion. It is quite fair to say that other exchange students and I were often shocked that UBC allows these courses to occur annually without making efforts to improve them. At UBC as a whole, less is expected from students than at my home university. I've seen people never show up to class and hold presentations that would never fly at my home uni. Professors seems to welcome all questions even if they are about things a fourth-year engineering student just months before graduation needs to know. I am not sure if UBC ensures that its graduates are adequately educated, and would definitely think twice if I was a recruiter and had to hire someone who attented there. From what I have seen, I would tentatively recommend Sauder Business School. For Mechanical Engineering (and probably also Electrical and Civil Engineering), UBC is simply too small, offering a lack of choices and not many lectures; usually, only introductory courses are offered for most topics. I recommend attending a more engineering/science-focused university, such as Waterloo or others in the US or Europe. It is quite astonishing how much money people pay to attend these subpar classes. Enjoyed having a beach on campus.
Nothing to show
You can study and get a degree here, but the university in itself cares little about students and does very little to help when needed. Guidelines are very vague and facilities are not built for as many students as are accepted.
Each professor that I have had so far was extremely encouraging and was often willing to go the extra step to make sure I understood the course content. The professors I could tell were very tenured and loved their roles. This helped me to foster even more of a passion for sociology, and I would highly recommend students take at least one course because the experience is quite interesting.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
