The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology - HKUST vs City University of Hong Kong - CityU vs Hong Kong Metropolitan University - HKMU vs ESEUNE Business School vs Hong Kong Nang Yan College of Higher Education - HKNY
Side-by-side comparison from 22 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Supportive professors and helpful administrators
- +Beautiful and modern campus environment
- +Ample career and extracurricular opportunities
- +Strong program depth and regional focus
- +Experienced and helpful faculty mentorship
- +Practical skills and real-world experience opportunities
- +Supportive and helpful faculty
- +Flexible and suitable academic schedules
- +Positive and engaging learning environment
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues are a consistent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and inadequate resources hinder the learning experience.
- -Poor communication and a lack of student support create a negative environment.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and feedback is a consistent problem.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of campus space are disappointing.
- -Low university ranking and poor professor English proficiency are major concerns.
- -Inconsistent attendance policies create a less engaging academic environment.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This institution receives strong marks for its facilities and value, both rated at 4.17. Professors and internationality are also well-regarded with scores of 4.0. Areas for potential improvement include student life (3.5), with location and accommodation scoring a slightly higher 3.67. Overall, the university demonstrates a solid performance across multiple facets.
With outstanding marks in **Professors, Location, and Value (all 5/5)**, this institution excels in key areas. Student life and accommodation also receive very high scores (4.8/5). Facilities are rated well at 4/5, while Internationality stands out as the relatively weakest area, though still strong at 4.2/5.
This institution receives commendable scores in several key areas, with its **Facilities and Professors** standing out as particular strengths. **Location** also scores well. However, **Student Life** and **Accomodation** present areas for improvement, alongside **Internationality**. The overall **Value** is rated moderately.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 4/5, students praise the scenic campus, supportive professors, and available opportunities. Though a small percentage of feedback mentions challenging accents and harsh grading, the majority is positive.
All ten reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.5/5. Students praise the university's strong programs, experienced faculty, and practical learning opportunities like internships and exchange programs.
With ~83% positive reviews, students highlight helpful professors, good teacher-student relationships, and a positive learning atmosphere. A smaller ~17% of feedback mentioned low English proficiency for some professors and limited campus facilities.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
The lowest university rank in Hong Kong. Some professor English level is extremely low. You don’t feel like this is a university because they lack of campus facility with only two huge buildings for the students. Most of the student just come here to go to class and then usually directly go back home. The school is quite flexible because they don't take any attendance in my major. The only advantage for me is the university is in Hong Kong. That's it !
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show