Universidad de Cantabria vs Universidad de la Sabana vs Université de Bourgogne - UB vs Universidade Positivo - UP vs Universidad de Cundinamarca - UCUNDINAMARCA

Side-by-side comparison from 71 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Universidad de la Sabana (4.60)
Universidad de Cantabria: wins 0/7 categories
Universidad de la Sabana: wins 3/7 categories
Université de Bourgogne - UB: wins 0/7 categories
Universidade Positivo - UP: wins 4/7 categories
Universidad de Cundinamarca - UCUNDINAMARCA: wins 0/7 categories
University of Philippines Diliman - UPD: wins 0/7 categories
Asociación Colombiana de Facultades de Administración - ASCOLFA: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Civil Engineering
Cundinamarca, Colombia
4.60
Top
Read more reviews
11 reviews
×
Best programme: Administration
Best programme: Computer Science
Best programme: Advertising and Communication
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
3.83
4.33
4.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Location
4.82
4.11
3.70
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
4.16
4.78
Win
3.97
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
3.80
4.44
Win
4.06
2.50
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
3.47
4.56
4.09
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Value
4.13
4.44
Win
4.00
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
3.64
4.56
3.84
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Supportive and knowledgeable professors
  • +High-quality education and well-equipped facilities
  • +Positive student experience and personal growth
  • +Excellent academic quality and comprehensive programs
  • +Beautiful campus and enriching environment
  • +Humanistic approach and personal development focus
  • +Dedicated and knowledgeable faculty
  • +Practical skill development and personal growth
  • +Welcoming and inspiring campus environment
  • +Expert faculty and modern facilities
  • +Practical learning and professional preparation
  • +Networking opportunities and campus resources

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Limited professor engagement with students.
  • -Perceived lack of practical application in coursework.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause confusion and frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
  • -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant or poorly structured.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources are a common complaint.
  • -Course content and teaching quality are frequently criticized.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Facilities are outdated and poorly maintained.
  • -Inconsistent teaching quality and lack of support are common complaints.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This university garners its highest marks for **Location**, achieving a score of 4.82. Professors and Value also received strong scores, both exceeding 4.1. Conversely, **Student Life** presents the weakest area, rated at 3.47. Facilities and Accommodation are rated moderately, around 3.8 and 3.6 respectively. The university also shows good Internationality at 3.8.

With a diverse set of ratings, this institution excels in its academic offerings, evidenced by an outstanding score for Professors. Student Life and Accommodations also receive very high marks. While Facilities are rated positively, they represent the lowest score among the surveyed areas. The university demonstrates solid performance across Location, Internationality, and Value.

Performance shows a very strong showing in Student Life and Internationality, both scoring over 4.0. Facilities and Value also received high marks, hitting a 4.0 average. The university's weakest area is Professors, with a rating just under 4.0.

Outstanding scores highlight the university's strengths in facilities, location, student life, and accommodation, all receiving perfect marks. Conversely, its internationality is a notable weakness, scoring significantly lower at 2.5. Value for money also presents a moderate area for improvement, reflected in its 3-star rating. Professors are rated well at 4 stars, indicating a solid academic foundation.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With ~74% positive feedback from 23 reviews and an average rating of 3.65/5, students praise the supportive professors, modern facilities, and high-quality education. Minimal negative feedback (~4%) noted limited professor engagement.

With 11 reviews and an average of 4.64/5 stars, ~100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight the excellent academic quality, beautiful campus, and humanistic approach. There is no negative feedback.

With ~100% positive feedback from 34 reviews and an average rating of 4.03/5, students highlight respected faculty, practical programs, and an inclusive campus culture. No negative reviews were provided.

Reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%), with an average rating of 4.33/5. Students highlight modern facilities, a diverse community, and supportive faculty. Some mention opportunities for practical learning and networking.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
13%
64%
18%
33%
0%
0%
0%
4★
43%
36%
68%
67%
0%
0%
0%
3★
39%
0%
15%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
4%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
The laboratoty practices

I really like the organization of this university, you can see they put effort on that. And also the teachers and Doctors that work there. You can see they all have an amazing career and they do care for us.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close