National Research University Higher School of Economics - HSE vs Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia - RUDN vs Moscow School of Management SKOLKOVO vs Moscow International Higher Business School - MIRBIS vs Elbrus Coding Bootcamp

Side-by-side comparison from 34 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
National Research University Higher School of Economics - HSE: wins 0/1 categories
Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia - RUDN: wins 0/1 categories
Moscow School of Management SKOLKOVO: wins 1/1 categories
Moscow International Higher Business School - MIRBIS: wins 0/1 categories
Elbrus Coding Bootcamp: wins 0/1 categories
Center for Creative Leadership: wins 0/1 categories
Moscow State Institute of Culture: wins 0/1 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Economics and Finance
Best programme: BA Political Science
Best programme: Accounting and Management
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Psychology of Human Resources Development
Best programme: Professional Musicianship - Vocals
Category ratings
Facilities
4.14
3.80
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
3.00
Location
4.67
4.20
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
4.00
Professors
4.33
3.80
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
5.00
Internationality
4.18
4.20
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
5.00
Student life
4.10
4.50
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
4.00
Value
4.48
4.00
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
3.00
Accommodation
3.99
3.20
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
4.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +High academic quality & skilled faculty
  • +Global outlook & diverse programs
  • +Career opportunities & strong network
  • +Engaging academics, practical skill development, and career support
  • +Vibrant, multicultural atmosphere with global connections and cultural exchange
  • +Diverse program options and research opportunities
  • +Engaging, relevant instruction from passionate, supportive faculty.
  • +Emphasis on analytical thinking and practical application of concepts.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Student-centered support and inclusivity
  • +Welcoming and understanding community
  • +Inspiring and dream-fulfilling education
  • +Excellent professors
  • +Suitable for diverse student backgrounds
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues hinder student support.
  • -Inconsistent teaching quality and subjective academic processes are problematic.
  • -Unrealistic exam difficulty and demanding workloads cause frustration.
  • -Administrative and management issues, including allegations of corruption and biased treatment.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Facilities are often outdated and poorly maintained.
  • -Course content can be irrelevant or not up-to-date.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Facilities are often described as outdated or poorly maintained.
  • -Course content is perceived as irrelevant or not up-to-date.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are common complaints.
  • -Lack of responsiveness and poor communication are significant problems.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution demonstrates a particularly strong showing in its **Location**, receiving the highest rating. Value and Professors are also highly regarded. Conversely, the **Accomodation** received the lowest score among the evaluated aspects. The university also scores well in Internationality, Facilities, and Student Life, indicating a generally positive overall perception with a few areas for potential improvement.

This institution demonstrates a robust student life, scoring a 4.5, and excellent internationality and location at 4.2. However, accommodation presents the lowest score at 3.2, with facilities and professors also receiving moderate ratings of 3.8. Value is rated a solid 4.0, suggesting a generally positive experience balanced by some areas for improvement.

This institution achieves perfect scores across all assessed areas. Its facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value are all rated a stellar 5 out of 5. This indicates an exceptionally strong and well-rounded university experience with no discernible weak points based on this rating system.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths, with perfect scores awarded for Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, and Value. These areas represent the university's most outstanding attributes. The accommodation rating of 3 indicates a moderate but not exceptional aspect of the student experience. Internationality also scores well at 4, suggesting a generally welcoming environment for global students.

This institution garners excellent scores in key areas such as **Professors** and **Internationality**, both receiving perfect marks. **Location**, **Student Life**, and **Accomodation** also stand out with strong ratings. Conversely, **Facilities** and **Value** present as the weakest points, with average scores. Overall, the university demonstrates a robust academic and social environment, though improvements could be considered in its physical resources and perceived affordability.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Around 96% of reviews are positive, highlighting high-quality education, excellent faculty, and valuable connections. A small portion of feedback mentions issues with some professors and the grading system.

With a 4/5 average rating from 8 reviews, ~75% are positive. Students praise academic exploration, diverse cultures, and career preparation. A small portion (~12.5%) mention administrative delays and corruption allegations.

With one review, the average rating is 5/5. The feedback is overwhelmingly positive, highlighting engaging coursework, interactive instructors, and supportive guidance. No negative feedback was received.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

With one review, the university is highly rated at 5/5. This positive feedback highlights excellent student care and a welcoming environment. No negative reviews were received.

With a perfect 5/5 average rating from one review, this university is highly praised. The single review highlighted professors as great, helpful, and experienced, fulfilling a dream to study music.

Rating distribution
5★
65%
50%
100%
0%
0%
100%
100%
4★
22%
25%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
3★
9%
13%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
4%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
13%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Massive Corruption

"Based on my experience in the PhD Department of Plastic Surgery at the Russian University of Peoples' Friendship named after Patrice Lumumba, significant allegations of corruption have arisen. Faculty members have repeatedly suggested that PhD students engage third parties to bypass direct scientific interactions in exchange for financial incentives. Despite my diligent efforts, I faced biased exams after refusing to participate in these corrupt practices. Complaints to higher authorities yielded no action, and the review committee failed to impartially assess my claims. Consequently, I was expelled in my third year. Now, I struggle to gain readmission or transfer due to pervasive corruption in the field of plastic surgery. I have provided evidence, including a screenshot of a conversation with my supervisor and an audio recording with the department head. My initial aspirations to contribute to scientific advancement have been shattered by the corruption I encountered, leaving me deeply disillusioned and distressed."

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close