Russian Gnessins' Academy of Music vs National Research University Higher School of Economics - HSE vs Moscow School of Management SKOLKOVO vs Moscow International Higher Business School - MIRBIS vs Elbrus Coding Bootcamp

Side-by-side comparison from 27 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Russian Gnessins' Academy of Music: wins 0/2 categories
National Research University Higher School of Economics - HSE: wins 0/2 categories
Moscow School of Management SKOLKOVO: wins 2/2 categories
Moscow International Higher Business School - MIRBIS: wins 0/2 categories
Elbrus Coding Bootcamp: wins 0/2 categories
Center for Creative Leadership: wins 0/2 categories
Moscow Humanitarian Economic Institute - MGEU: wins 0/2 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Economics and Finance
Best programme: Accounting and Management
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Psychology of Human Resources Development
Best programme: Advanced Management
Category ratings
Facilities
Not rated
4.14
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
4.00
Location
Not rated
4.67
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
5.00
Professors
Not rated
4.33
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
4.50
Internationality
Not rated
4.18
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
4.00
Student life
Not rated
4.10
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
4.50
Value
Not rated
4.48
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
4.00
Accommodation
Not rated
3.99
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
4.50
Pros & Cons
Pros

Nothing to show

  • +High academic quality & skilled faculty
  • +Global outlook & diverse programs
  • +Career opportunities & strong network
  • +Engaging, relevant instruction from passionate, supportive faculty.
  • +Emphasis on analytical thinking and practical application of concepts.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Student-centered support and inclusivity
  • +Welcoming and understanding community
  • +Strong faculty and teaching quality
  • +Convenient location and accessibility
  • +Comprehensive programs with practical experience
Cons

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues hinder student support.
  • -Inconsistent teaching quality and subjective academic processes are problematic.
  • -Unrealistic exam difficulty and demanding workloads cause frustration.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Facilities are often outdated and poorly maintained.
  • -Course content can be irrelevant or not up-to-date.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Facilities are often described as outdated or poorly maintained.
  • -Course content is perceived as irrelevant or not up-to-date.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of engaging teaching methods and poor curriculum quality are common complaints.
Rating summary
What students say

Nothing to show

This institution demonstrates a particularly strong showing in its **Location**, receiving the highest rating. Value and Professors are also highly regarded. Conversely, the **Accomodation** received the lowest score among the evaluated aspects. The university also scores well in Internationality, Facilities, and Student Life, indicating a generally positive overall perception with a few areas for potential improvement.

This institution achieves perfect scores across all assessed areas. Its facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value are all rated a stellar 5 out of 5. This indicates an exceptionally strong and well-rounded university experience with no discernible weak points based on this rating system.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths, with perfect scores awarded for Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, and Value. These areas represent the university's most outstanding attributes. The accommodation rating of 3 indicates a moderate but not exceptional aspect of the student experience. Internationality also scores well at 4, suggesting a generally welcoming environment for global students.

Overall, this institution garners favorable ratings across multiple aspects. Its location stands out as a significant strength, receiving a perfect score. Professors and student life are also highly regarded, both earning 4.5 stars. While most areas are strong, facilities and internationality are rated slightly lower at 4 stars, representing the weakest points in this assessment.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Nothing to show

Around 96% of reviews are positive, highlighting high-quality education, excellent faculty, and valuable connections. A small portion of feedback mentions issues with some professors and the grading system.

With one review, the average rating is 5/5. The feedback is overwhelmingly positive, highlighting engaging coursework, interactive instructors, and supportive guidance. No negative feedback was received.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

With one review, the university is highly rated at 5/5. This positive feedback highlights excellent student care and a welcoming environment. No negative reviews were received.

With an average rating of 4/5 based on 2 reviews, feedback is overwhelmingly positive. Students highlight excellent teaching staff, strong Economics program, and convenient city center location. Opportunities for internships and vibrant student events are also praised.

Rating distribution
5★
0%
65%
100%
0%
0%
100%
0%
4★
0%
22%
0%
0%
0%
0%
100%
3★
0%
9%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
4%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close