Poznan University of Technology - PUT vs Universidade Estadual de Feira de Santana - UEFS vs University of Caldas vs La Rochelle Tourism and Hospitality School vs AMERICAN UNIVERSITY OF MIDDLE EAST - AUM

Side-by-side comparison from 27 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Poznan University of Technology - PUT (4.10)
Poznan University of Technology - PUT: wins 4/6 categories
Universidade Estadual de Feira de Santana - UEFS: wins 1/6 categories
University of Caldas: wins 0/6 categories
La Rochelle Tourism and Hospitality School: wins 0/6 categories
AMERICAN UNIVERSITY OF MIDDLE EAST - AUM: wins 0/6 categories
Nigeria Maritime University - NMU: wins 0/6 categories
Universitas Garut: wins 1/6 categories
Comparing
Best programme: School of Engineering/Technology
Best programme: Psychology
Manizales, Colombia
3.00
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Garut, Indonesia
4.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Public Administration
Category ratings
Facilities
4.44
Win
3.67
2.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
Location
4.22
4.33
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Professors
4.39
Win
3.67
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
Internationality
4.06
Win
2.67
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
1.00
Student life
4.06
4.33
Win
2.50
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Value
3.94
4.00
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
Accommodation
3.78
Win
3.00
1.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Practical, industry-connected programs with research opportunities
  • +Strong international focus and English-taught courses
  • +Modern facilities and helpful administrative support
  • +Rich and diverse cultural environment and events.
  • +Strong academic reputation, quality education, and good postgraduate courses.
  • +Receptiveness to international students and ample extracurricular opportunities.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Supportive lecturers and relevant curriculum
  • +Opportunities for real-world application and professional development
  • +Continuous institutional growth and improvement
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder the learning experience.
  • -Lack of clear communication and transparency is a recurring problem.
  • -Administrative & management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are consistently problematic.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a recurring complaint.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues create significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are common complaints.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support negatively impacts the student experience.
Rating summary
What students say

Generally positive feedback marks this university's performance, with facilities emerging as the strongest area, scoring a notable 4.44. Professors also received high marks at 4.39. On the other hand, accommodation stands out as the weakest point, receiving a 3.78. Student life and internationality are rated at a respectable 4.06, while location and value fall within the mid-range of the provided scores.

This institution garners excellent marks for its location and student life, both receiving a score of 4.33. The value proposition is also strong at 4. Accommodation is rated moderately at 3. Facilities and professors are rated similarly at 3.67. However, internationality stands out as the weakest area, with a rating of 2.67.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

With an outstanding score in **Location** (5), this institution shines. However, its **Internationality** (1) presents a significant area for improvement. Ratings for Facilities, Professors, Student Life, Accommodation, and Value are consistent, all landing in the mid-range at 3 or 4, suggesting a solid but not exceptional experience in these aspects.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4.1/5 from 20 reviews, students highly praise the university. Recurring themes include strong engineering programs, industry connections, and excellent labs and faculty. No negative feedback was reported.

With an average rating of 4/5 from 4 reviews, about 100% are positive. Students highlight the university's multicultural and scientific environment, rich culture, and extracurricular opportunities.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with ~100% of reviews being highly favorable. Students highlight a supportive college experience, a relevant curriculum, and competent, approachable lecturers.

Rating distribution
5★
25%
25%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
4★
60%
50%
0%
0%
0%
0%
100%
3★
15%
25%
100%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close