Rennes School of Business vs emlyon business school vs EDHEC Business School vs Audencia Business School vs ESSCA School of Management
Side-by-side comparison from 206 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Practical, business-focused education with experienced professors
- +Diverse and inclusive international community and learning environment
- +Excellent academic quality and supportive facilities
- +Practical and international programs with diverse students
- +Valuable professional experience through internships and work-study
- +Supportive environment for personal and professional development
- +Outstanding teaching quality and practical, employer-aligned courses
- +Strong corporate network and valuable career services
- +Rigorous academics with practical industry insights
- +Excellent teachers and diverse international community
- +Great facilities and well-structured classes
- +Supportive learning environment and city amenities
- +Strong academic programs with international focus and practical experience.
- +Approachable and supportive teachers fostering a positive learning environment.
- +Vibrant campus life and opportunities for personal and professional growth.
- +Diverse student and educator backgrounds
- +Opportunities for personal and career growth
- +Supportive and organized academic environment
- +High-quality, practical, hands-on teaching
- +Focus on professional tools and industry relevance
- -Administrative and management issues are prevalent and unhelpful.
- -Poor English communication and resources are a significant barrier for international students.
- -Professors' English proficiency is a recurring concern.
- -Lack of practical value and shallow content in courses.
- -Unfair and frustrating grading, especially for group projects.
- -Disappointing professor engagement and program support.
- -High tuition fees and perceived poor value for money are a major concern.
- -Limited practical training and theory-heavy courses.
- -Unresponsive professors and resistance to feedback.
- -Lack of student interaction and networking opportunities.
- -Ineffective and unprepared professors with poor language skills.
- -Poor organization and irrelevant, expensive courses.
- -Lack of student engagement and focus on partying.
- -Limited extracurriculars and career opportunities.
- -Poor quality of facilities and overall environment.
- -Lack of academic rigor and student engagement.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and inadequate resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from instructors is a recurring problem.
Student life and internationality stand out as the university's strongest aspects, both scoring above 4.3. Professors and location also received very favorable reviews. Accommodation emerged as the weakest area, with a rating of 3.76, though overall value and facilities were rated well above average.
This institution demonstrates exceptional strength in its internationality and location, both scoring above 4.5. Student life and value also received positive marks, exceeding 4.2 and 4.4 respectively. However, accommodation presents as the weakest area, with the lowest rating of approximately 3.94. Facilities and professors also received solid, though slightly lower, scores in comparison.
The university excels in Internationality with a rating of 4.45, closely followed by its Professors at 4.32 and Facilities at 4.23. Student Life and Value also receive positive marks. Conversely, Accomodation presents the weakest area, scoring 3.21, with Location also being a moderate concern at 3.77. Overall, the institution demonstrates strengths in its academic and global offerings, while areas concerning student living arrangements and campus surroundings could see improvement.
This university garners strong marks for its **Internationality**, receiving a high rating of 4.385. Professors and Value also score well at 4.125. Areas like Facilities and Student Life are generally positive, hovering around 4.0. The weakest area is **Accomodation**, with a rating of 3.579, indicating it could benefit from improvement compared to other aspects of the university experience.
Evaluations reveal a university with particularly strong offerings in **location** and **student life**, both exceeding a 4.1 rating. Conversely, **accommodation** stands out as the weakest area, scoring significantly lower at 3.41. Other aspects like professors, facilities, internationality, and value fall within a solid mid-to-high range, generally between 3.75 and 3.94.
The university exhibits exceptional strengths in its location and internationality, both scoring a near-perfect 4.93. Professors also receive high marks at 4.64, complemented by strong student life (4.15) and value (4.29). The weakest areas are facilities, rated at 3.92, and accommodation, which received a 3.62.
Offering a prime location, this institution scores exceptionally well in that regard, alongside strong marks for professors, student life, and internationality. However, accommodation presents a significant weakness, receiving the lowest rating. Facilities and value are rated moderately.
Over 97% of reviews are positive, highlighting strong teaching methods, practical learning, and global faculty. A small amount of negative feedback concerns administrative support and language accessibility for international students.
The vast majority of university students have a positive experience, highlighting academic rigor, practical learning, and international environments. A small fraction of reviews mention disappointment with course content and grading.
With an average rating of 4.25/5 from 48 reviews, ~74% of feedback is positive. Students highlight outstanding teaching quality, practical courses, strong industry alignment, and excellent career services/alumni networks. One negative review mentioned high tuition fees.
Nearly all (95%) of 20 university reviews are positive, praising the learning environment, great facilities, and good teachers. A single negative review cited disappointment with practical tool training and professor engagement.
Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting enriching experiences, approachable teachers, and good knowledge transfer. A small percentage of negative feedback mentions unprepared professors and irrelevant courses.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with 13 out of 14 (93%) giving high ratings. Students praise the diverse educators and peer networks, cultural exposure, and opportunities for personal and academic growth. A small percentage of feedback (around 7%) mentions a lack of extracurricular activities and internship availability for earlier years.
With a perfect 5/5 average rating, this program is overwhelmingly positive. Students praise high-quality, practical teaching with a hands-on approach. There is minimal negative feedback.
The school stands out as an exemplary institution with commendable features. The accommodation facilities are not only comfortable but also designed to foster a conducive learning environment. The faculty comprises diverse, highly qualified educators, ensuring a high standard of education. The emphasis on practical learning prepares students effectively for real-world scenarios. The institution offers a top-notch academic experience combined with excellent living standards, making it a highly recommended choice for those seeking quality education.
Nothing to show
I absolutely love everything about EDHEC, beginning from the pedagogy to the atmosphere it provides to the students (especially international) on campus. The extracurricular activities like sports, associations are very helpful. Also, the career service provided is top-notch. Therefore, I would call it an enriching experience so far.
I have been quite satisfied by the quality of teaching at Audencia. The lecturers and professors are knowledgeable and place an emphasis on professionalism and leveraging culture in business dealings.
Overall, I had a positive experience at ESSCA. The programme is well organized and provides a solid foundation in business and management. The courses were generally of good quality and covered a broad range of topics, helping students develop both academic knowledge and practical skills. One of the aspects I appreciated most was the international exchange during the third year. ESSCA has a good network of partner universities, and the opportunity to study abroad was a valuable part of the programme. Student life is also a real strength of the school. The associative environment is active and offers many opportunities to get involved outside the classroom, meet new people, and gain additional experience. Like any programme, some courses were more engaging than others, but overall I found the experience enriching and would recommend it to students looking for a business school with a strong international dimension and a good balance between academics and extracurricular activities.
I loved being at Schiller in Heidelberg. The setting and the city were very serene and the exposure to all those students and teachers from such different and diverse backgrounds was a great learning experience. Additionally, the ease of accessing the Schiller campuses in the other countries was a great additional bonus to studying at Schiller. I would most definitely recommend Schiller to other students who are looking for a very culturally fulfilling experience.
Nothing to show
