Universitat CEU Abat Oliba - CEU UAO vs Universidad CEU San Pablo - CEU USP vs UIC Barcelona vs University of Deusto - Deusto Business School vs Universidad de Extremadura
Side-by-side comparison from 133 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Supportive faculty and staff
- +Modern facilities and resources
- +Academic excellence and innovative methodology
- +Practical, real-world skills training
- +Professional, industry-experienced faculty
- +Supportive and welcoming atmosphere
- +Excellent academic programs and knowledgeable, kind professors.
- +Supportive and collaborative student atmosphere.
- +Strong preparation for career success and international outlook.
- +Welcoming community and supportive, knowledgeable professors
- +Comprehensive and practical academic programs
- +Enriching personal and global development
- +Small class sizes and personalized attention
- +Supportive staff and welcoming environment for international students
- +Dynamic classes, engaging curriculum, and numerous events/activities
- +Exceptional chef instructors and curriculum quality.
- +Strong emphasis on skill development and practical experience.
- +Valuable international reputation and alumni network.
- +Practical, real-world project experience
- +Supportive faculty and staff
- +Strong community and collaborative atmosphere
- -Poor management and unqualified staff.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment.
- -Lack of administrative support and disorganization.
- -Low professor English proficiency and lack of student/teacher engagement.
- -Poor organization and administrative issues.
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
- -Lack of support and indifferent attitude from staff create a negative experience.
- -Administrative and management issues cause confusion and frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning and student comfort.
- -Lack of effective communication and support from staff is a significant problem.
- --Poor professor quality and unhelpful staff.
- --Administrative and management issues.
- --Substandard facilities, particularly in the Medicine faculty.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment.
- -Poor communication and administrative support.
- -Lack of practical application and relevance in coursework.
- -Administrative & management issues are frequent problems.
- -Facilities are often described as outdated or in poor condition.
- -Instruction and curriculum are sometimes perceived as lacking relevance or quality.
This university garners strong approval, particularly for its **accommodation**, which achieved the highest rating. Facilities and student life also scored well. Conversely, **internationality** received the lowest rating among the surveyed aspects. Professors, location, and value for money are all rated at a solid 4 out of 5.
This institution garners a solid academic reputation, with professors receiving a strong rating of 3.82. While facilities and student life also score well around 3.6, accommodation emerges as the weakest area, rated at 3.16. Internationality and value also present as moderate aspects of the university experience.
The university demonstrates particular strengths in its academic offerings, with **Professors** receiving a high rating of 4.27. **Facilities** are also well-regarded at 4.09. Areas for improvement are evident in **Accomodation**, which scored lowest at 3.33. Other aspects like Location, Student Life, Internationality, and Value are rated moderately.
This institution shows strong performance in several key areas, with Location and Value both receiving a high rating of 4.37. Professors and Facilities are also well-regarded, scoring 4.26. Student Life, at 4.11, and Internationality, at 3.84, are moderately rated. The weakest area appears to be Accomodation, which received a score of 3.26.
This institution garners exceptional scores in several key areas, notably achieving perfect marks for its **Facilities**, **Professors**, and **Accommodations**. Student life is also a significant strength, rated at 4.5. The university demonstrates good internationality with a score of 4 and offers excellent value. Its weakest area, however, lies in its **Location**, receiving a moderate score of 3.5.
Performance varies across key aspects of university life. Outstanding ratings were awarded for Location (4.75) and Professors (4.625), alongside strong marks for Internationality (4.625) and Facilities (4.5). Student Life (3.875) and Value (4.125) received good scores. Accomodation stands out as the weakest area, with a rating of 3.
This institution garners exceptional ratings, achieving a perfect score in Facilities, Professors, Student Life, and Internationality. Its Value is also highly rated at 5. The Accommodations are well-regarded with a score of 4.6. The Location is the sole area scoring slightly lower, at 4.4, though still representing a positive attribute.
Most reviews praise the academic environment, dedicated professors, and supportive staff. A small percentage of feedback mentions issues with a specific director and teacher hiring practices.
Approximately 74% of 28 reviews are positive, highlighting professional, sector-active teachers and practical, real-world facilities. A small portion of feedback (~7%) expresses disappointment with low English proficiency among some professors and organizational issues.
With an average rating of 4.21/5, approximately 86% of reviews are positive, praising the collaborative atmosphere, quality programs, and accessible location. One review (around 7%) cites issues with indifferent administration.
With ~90% positive feedback, students highlight welcoming communities and exceptionally useful, kindly delivered teaching. The average rating is 4.27/5.
Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting small classes, professor attention, and enjoyable city life. Negative feedback (about 27.8%) mentions some poor teaching quality and organizational issues.
All eight student reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.63/5. Students highly praise the knowledgeable instructors, quality curriculum, and enriching learning experience.
All 6 reviews are positive, with a 5/5 average rating. Students praise working on real projects and the enriching, transformative academic experience. The supportive community, expert faculty, and helpful staff are frequently highlighted.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Classes are good, I would try to make them more interactive and with more practices in class. Professors normally are good, in the english course I believe the english of the teachers could be better specially if the course is taught in that language. I also believe professors could interact more with their students and try to get in contact with students they see may be struggling. Otherwise the campus, although a bit small is fine, really nice, the library could be a little bigger.
The DBS MBA is a master's degree for people who really want to learn a lot in a relatively short time, to do so they use a very dynamic and fast-paced work methodology, and in my opinion very useful and effective. In addition, teamwork is encouraged almost at all times, values that are highly valued if you come from more autonomous training such as engineering. The more purely theoretical training is also combined with real cases of entrepreneurship or experiences of successful people with high experience in the business world. Without a doubt, quality-price, I think it is the best master's degree you can opt for. Of course, being part of the Deusto Business School will greatly facilitate your access to the world of work, as well as a great networking network.
The University of Extremadura is divided into 3 large campuses located in the cities of Cáceres, Badajoz and Mérida. Depending on the specialty you want to study, you will reside in one city or another. The cities are comfortable, with a good university atmosphere and cheap to live in the city. Many activities and events are organized within each campus. The teaching staff is friendly and the classes are dynamic.
I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.
A very proactive university, providing many employability days to improve your prospects. Always there to help if you have any queries or doubts, with specifically assigned tutors. As well as this, the hands on learning environment is unforgettable. Working with real businesses gives you great knowledge and understanding about the working world.
