Yerevan State University - YSU vs American University of Armenia - AUA vs Armenian State University of Economics - ASUE vs Russian-Armenian University vs French University in Armenia - UFAR
Side-by-side comparison from 34 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Quality education and knowledgeable professors
- +Excellent opportunities and resources
- +Focus on personal development and positive experiences
- +Supportive learning environment with inspiring, diverse peers and helpful faculty.
- +High-quality, practical curriculum offering valuable real-world experience.
- +Positive campus atmosphere and central location in Yerevan.
- +Dedicated lecturers & practical, career-oriented courses
- +Strong academic foundation in economic/financial theory
- +Opportunities for research & university projects
- +Excellent teaching staff and strong networking opportunities
- +Affordable tuition and diverse program offerings
- +Positive university environment and international cooperation
- +International diploma opportunities and career preparation
- +High-quality lecturers and relevant course materials
- +Access to international study and language options
- +Diverse and proper educational programs across various fields
- +Essential artistic knowledge provision
- +Academic excellence and reputable institution
- +International presence and global outlook
- +Commitment to growth and development
- -Outdated teaching methods and resources are a recurring problem.
- -The examination system focuses on passing rather than actual learning.
- -The university offers little beyond what a basic course would provide.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
- -Lack of resources and support impacts student success.
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a significant drawback.
- -The curriculum and teaching methods are often perceived as unengaging or ineffective.
- -Unpleasant and unwelcoming staff attitude.
- -Poor and unsafe school grounds accessibility.
- -Outdated curriculum and teaching methods
- -Lack of practical application and real-world relevance
- -Administrative and management issues
- -Administrative and management issues create confusion and frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from instructors is a common complaint.
- -Administrative and management issues disrupt student experience.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of communication and support from staff is frustrating.
This university garners excellent scores for its **Location** (5) and **Student Life** (4.5), alongside a strong showing for **Professors** (4.67) and **Value** (4.5). However, **Accomodation** (2.67) stands out as a considerably weaker area. **Facilities** (3.67) and **Internationality** (3.5) also received moderate ratings.
This university garners strong praise across multiple aspects, with its location particularly standing out at a 4.5 rating. Professors, student life, and value also received solid scores of 4.25. Facilities and accommodation were rated a respectable 4, while internationality also achieved a 4. Overall, the university presents a well-rounded offering, with its prime location being its most significant asset.
A strong overall performance is evident, with the university excelling particularly in its **location (5)**. Ratings for facilities, professors, student life, internationality, and value are all a solid 4, indicating a generally positive experience in these areas. However, **accommodation stands out as a significant weakness, receiving a low rating of 1**. This suggests a considerable area for improvement.
Across several key aspects, this institution presents a fairly consistent picture. Its strongest areas include facilities, location, student life, accommodation, and internationality, all receiving a solid rating of 3. However, the university's professors and overall value appear to be its weakest points, with both rated at 2.5.
Presenting a consistent performance across all metrics, this university received a neutral rating of zero in every surveyed category. Notably, there are no areas of particular strength or weakness identified, suggesting an even distribution of perceived quality. This uniformity across facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value indicates a consistent, albeit unremarkable, experience for students.
The university demonstrates a notably strong performance in **Student Life** and **Value**, both receiving perfect scores. Conversely, its **Facilities** and **Accomodation** are areas that could be improved, scoring a moderate 3. Other aspects, including **Professors**, **Location**, and **Internationality**, fall within a solid, positive range.
This institution garners perfect scores across every evaluated aspect. With a remarkable 5 out of 5 in Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, Accommodation, Internationality, and Value, there are no discernible weak areas. The university demonstrates exceptional strength in all surveyed categories, indicating a consistently high-quality experience for its students.
Most reviews are positive (~79%), highlighting good education and professors. Some suggestions include more practical internships and international exchange programs. A small portion (~14%) found teaching outdated or lacking.
With a 4.3/5 average rating from 10 reviews, ~90% are positive. Students praise the supportive environment, knowledgeable professors, and international atmosphere. Little negative feedback was noted.
With an average rating of 4/5, reviews indicate a positive student experience, with ~67% of feedback being positive. No negative feedback was reported.
Four out of five reviews are positive, rating the university a 4/5 average. Positive feedback highlights helpful teachers and a good learning environment. One negative review criticizes the university's attitude.
The vast majority of reviews are positive (~89%), praising the academic programs, international opportunities, and faculty. A small percentage (~11%) mention some academic limitations.
With a 4/5 average rating from one review, the university is praised for its wide range of study programs and thorough artistic education. No negative feedback was recorded.
With a perfect 5/5 average rating from one review, this university garners universally positive feedback. No negative comments were received, indicating ~100% satisfaction.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Armenian State University of Economics has many departments like Management, Finance, Accounting and Audit, International Economic Relations, Marketing, Computer Science. I got my bachelor degree in Management in this university. By the time I studied there (2010-2014), the classes had mainly theoretical part, almost no practical, most of the professors had lack of abroad training and up-to-date knowledge. Besides, some of the courses were not relevant to the specialization at all and you had no right to refuse taking those courses. This was actually very disappointing, as I expected the classes to be more up-to-date, more career-oriented. But still, here you can get sound knowledge for all the best managerial theories and practices if you're eager to learn. In order to get your bachelor degree in this university, you need to study for 4 years, and 2 for masters. Mainly local people study here, there's almost no nationality diversity. The university has several buildings separated for different faculties. The library is not very diverse. The university has its own cafeteria and sport ground. For me, this is a medium-level university, which can give you some basic knowledge to start your evolution from :)
Nothing to show
I'm a student of marketing faculty, and honestly, I am disappointed with my choice. As an advantage, I can say that you can learn additional 2-3 new languages fluently. Also, after graduating you have 2 degrees. However, I'm a sophomore and during these two years I haven't learned anything but simple principles of marketing with Kotler's book. For you to know, today all the greatest marketing specialists say that Kotler's book is too old for today's market, even Kotler himself says that the market has changed and it needs a total new strategy. What I'm trying to say is that this university does not give you proper knowledge in the marketing field. We study economics, accounting, management etc. Maybe it is a good business school, but personally, I regret entering. I read tones of books, I do different internships and go to all kind of seminars and training to have the knowledge, to get to know to skills and simply to learn what my profession is. On the other hand, in this university, you are always mentally abused. Those security guys who ALWAYS YELL at you simply because you talked to your friend during the break or because you were late for 5 minutes,some lecturers who kill the creativity and motivation in you, the Head which makes changes whenever and however they want and you can't contribute to stopping those changes, because you don't have a voice. I do think that education has a vital importance, but also I think that your health, inner peace and harmony are more important. Internet is full of books, mentors and information. My advice is, choose a university where you'll be MENTALLY STABLE and just learn to learn on your own. P.s. maybe this review is harsh, these are things which are real but unfortunately, no one talks about them. P.s.s. we don't have cafeteria, proper lecture halls, the building sucks, oh and yes, you can't celebrate the new year for 4 years as you have a bunch of exams during that time. Good luck!
Nothing to show
Nothing to show