University of Warsaw - UW vs Warsaw University of Technology vs SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities vs Collegium Humanum Warsaw Management University vs Civitas University
Side-by-side comparison from 251 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +High-quality, engaging academic programs with career preparation
- +Supportive and knowledgeable professors fostering personal and academic growth
- +Vibrant student life and attractive campus/location
- +Excellent faculty expertise and teaching quality
- +Interesting and practical programs with industry relevance
- +Engaging learning environment and student experience
- +Passionate and knowledgeable lecturers
- +Well-organized and relevant programs
- +Positive learning environment and resources
- +High education level and experienced professors
- +Valuable new skills acquisition
- +Worthwhile academic decision
- +International environment and diverse student body
- +Supportive staff and dedicated professors
- +Small class sizes and engaging learning opportunities
- +Strong academic programs and accreditations
- +Commitment to student development and success
- +Practical learning through internships and workshops
- +International environment and practical learning
- +Supportive faculty and experienced lecturers
- +Personal growth and networking opportunities
- -Useless and irrelevant coursework and lack of accessible information.
- -Underdeveloped course structure with insufficient classes.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a common complaint.
- -The curriculum and teaching methods are perceived as ineffective or irrelevant.
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant concern.
- -Poor organization and communication among staff lead to problems.
- -Lack of adequate academic structure and support is evident.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are a recurring complaint.
- -Communication breakdowns and unclear expectations lead to student dissatisfaction.
- -Lack of communication and disregard for student concerns on crucial issues.
- -Disappointing student experience and unfulfilled expectations.
- -Administrative and registration errors cause significant hassle and unexpected costs.
- -Poor teaching quality and lack of engaging learning environments are prevalent.
- -Inadequate student support, including limited facilities and poor communication, detracts from the experience.
- -Administrative & management issues lead to poor responsiveness and disappearing support after tuition payment.
This institution receives notably high marks across most aspects. Its strongest area is **Value**, closely followed by **Professors**, indicating excellent academic and financial returns. **Location** and **Internationality** also score very well. The weakest, though still respectable, category is **Facilities**. Overall, the university presents a strong offering with notable strengths in academic and financial aspects, with room for improvement primarily in its physical infrastructure.
This institution receives high marks in several key areas. Its strongest performance is in **Location**, followed closely by **Professors** and **Value**. **Facilities** and **Student Life** also rate well. Conversely, **Accomodation** and **Internationality** emerge as the comparatively weaker aspects, receiving the lowest scores among the surveyed categories.
This institution presents a strong academic profile, with exceptional ratings for its professors and facilities. Location and internationality also score well. Student life and accommodation represent areas with lower, though still respectable, scores compared to other aspects. The overall value for money is perceived positively, aligning with the location rating.
This institution garners excellent marks across the board. Its strongest areas, with perfect scores, are its facilities, professors, and prime location. Student life, accommodation, internationality, and perceived value are also highly rated, all receiving a 4.5. Overall, it presents a very appealing profile with no significant weaknesses identified.
This university receives strong marks, particularly for its **location** (4.7) and **internationality** (4.3). Areas like **facilities** and **value** also score well at 4.0. The **student life** rating is solid at 3.9. The **accommodation** category presents the weakest performance with a 3.3 rating, suggesting room for improvement in student housing.
An overall positive assessment emerges from these university ratings, with the institution excelling in **Location** (4.37) and **Internationality** (4.24). **Facilities** and **Professors** also receive high marks, both scoring approximately 4.17. The areas receiving the lowest scores are **Accomodation** (3.59), indicating room for improvement in this aspect, followed by **Student Life** and **Value**, both rated around 3.9.
The university demonstrates notable strengths in key areas. Location and value receive particularly high scores, suggesting excellent external factors and return on investment. Internationality and professors are also well-regarded. Conversely, accommodation presents the weakest area, indicating room for improvement. Student life and facilities also score moderately, suggesting these aspects could benefit from enhancement.
Nearly all ~99% of reviews are positive, highlighting strong academic programs, excellent professors, and a vibrant student life. A single negative review cited underdeveloped courses and difficulty accessing information.
With an average rating of 4.21/5 from 24 reviews, ~91% are positive. Students praise excellent faculty, engaging teaching, and positive learning environments. No negative reviews were reported.
Nearly all reviews are positive, praising passionate lecturers and well-organized programs. A small percentage of feedback mentions concerns about program structure and course coordination.
Both reviews are highly positive, with an average rating of 5/5. Students praised the high education level, great lectures, and experienced professors.
University reviews are largely positive (approximately 93%), with students appreciating the international environment and supportive staff. A small portion (~7%) expressed dissatisfaction regarding a canceled graduation ceremony.
With a 4.19/5 rating from 42 reviews, approximately 86% highlight positive aspects like university development, program quality, and organized processes. A small ~5% of feedback points to issues with administrative errors and a perceived lack of student immersion.
With an average rating of 4/5, approximately 80% of reviews are highly positive, praising the international environment, supportive faculty, and practical learning. A small amount of negative feedback (~10%) mentions administrative responsiveness issues after payment.
Complex concepts are easier for students to understand when presented in a well-organized succession. The curriculum at the institution creates an ideal learning atmosphere by skillfully fusing theory and real-world application. Using a variety of teaching approaches guarantees student involvement and accommodates different learning preferences. Furthermore, the curriculum places a strong emphasis on connection to the actual world, giving students hands-on experience. All things considered, the programme has been carefully designed to make learning more seamless for students and improve their understanding and utilisation of the material.
Well defined and well-maintained classes with highly trained professors. They are very much timely and can happily assist you and your questions during consultation 1 to 1. You can learn a great deal of Aerospace Engineering tools and get inspired by student clubs flying rockets and gliders, and racing cars.
Overall, i would rate programme at SWPS positively. What stands out the most is the practical approach to lerning. Many lectures have real professional expierience and often explain topics throhu examples from thier field, not only through theory or slides. The atmosphere is modern, open and quite relaxed, wich makes it easier to feel comfortable as a student. I also like that the university encourages independent thinking and discussion. However the organization could be better, especially considering the tuition fees. Some classes feel more useful and better prepared than others.
I would definitely recommend Collegium Humanum to other students. High education level, I was able to learn a lot of new skills, professors with huge experience in the professional sector - this is why I highly rate
Nothing to show
The art studios are equipped with the necessary tools and materials for creative expression. The school auditorium hosts various cultural events and performances, providing a platform for students to showcase their talents.
Personally, I think wwsb is one of the best private universities in Poland. It’s not just a place to study but a place to gain personal growth, networking opportunities, and the chance to contribute to research and innovation. The staffs are very friendly, teaching method is very unique and students can grasp what they’re being taught within a short period of time. Although there are no on-campus accommodations, the university helps you search for off-campus accommodation/apartment which I think is very good. The school is also situated at a very good location which makes the studying atmosphere wonderful.
