Aalto University vs South-Eastern Finland University of Applied Sciences - XAMK vs Arcada University of Applied Sciences - UAS vs Hanken School of Economics vs University of Eastern Finland
Side-by-side comparison from 78 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Rigorous, independent learning with practical, hands-on experience
- +Active student life, community support, and multidisciplinary collaboration
- +Flexible course options and excellent facilities
- +Passionate, supportive, and communicative educators
- +Practical, career-focused programmes and real-world connections
- +International atmosphere and flexible learning paths
- +Practical, relevant learning and real-world projects
- +Supportive and knowledgeable staff
- +Modern facilities and updated resources
- +High teaching quality and experienced lecturers
- +Engaging international environment
- +Helpful support services
- +Practical study experience with supportive faculty and accessible campus facilities.
- +Welcoming and diverse campus environment fostering social opportunities.
- +Efficient education and proximity to nature for leisure.
- +Approachable professors & strong academic programs
- +Welcoming city & positive student community
- +Good accommodation & proximity to campus
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology are a significant drawback.
- -Lack of support and engagement from staff is concerning.
- -Inefficient administrative processes cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and transparency from staff creates confusion.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and lack of support are prevalent concerns.
- -Administrative and management issues are frequently cited.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources are a recurring complaint.
- -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant or poorly implemented.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor resource allocation are consistently criticized.
- -A lack of effective teaching and curriculum relevance is a major concern.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of effective communication and support is a problem.
Nothing to show
With a generally strong showing across multiple aspects, this university excels in **Facilities**, receiving a high rating of 4.39. **Internationality** and **Value** also scored well, both above 4.3. Conversely, **Location** presents the weakest area, with a rating of 4.06. The university demonstrates robust performance in student-focused categories like **Student Life** and **Accomodation**, while **Professors** also maintain a solid score.
This institution earns exceptionally high marks, particularly in the **professors** category with a near-perfect score. **Facilities** and **internationality** also stand out with strong ratings. Areas receiving slightly lower, though still positive, scores include **student life** and **accommodation**. Overall, the university demonstrates a well-rounded positive profile.
This institution demonstrates outstanding strengths in its **Professors**, achieving a perfect score. Facilities and Value also receive exceptionally high marks. Conversely, Accomodation is the lowest-rated category. Other aspects like Location, Student Life, and Internationality are well-regarded, indicating a generally positive student experience.
This institution excels in several key areas, boasting perfect scores for Facilities, Professors, and Student Life, alongside a strong rating for Value. Accommodations are also well-regarded. However, the university's Internationality score is notably lower than other aspects, indicating a potential area for development. The location also received a good, but not perfect, rating.
This institution garners exceptional scores, notably achieving a perfect 5 for Student Life. Facilities, Professors, and Accommodation are also highly rated at 4.33. Location and Internationality are solid at 4, with Value also receiving a 4. The weakest area, though still positive, is Value at 4.
Overall, this university garners strong ratings across several key areas. Facilities and professors are particularly well-regarded, both receiving 4.25. Internationality is also a positive, scoring a 4. Value for money is also strong at 4.125. The weakest areas appear to be student life (3.71) and location and accommodation, both rated at 3.875.
Nothing to show
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~92% 4-5 stars), highlighting strong academic challenges, independent learning, and active student life with multidisciplinary opportunities. A small amount of feedback (~8%) suggests courses may be too short to fully grasp topics.
All 26 reviews are positive, averaging 4.88/5. Students praise practical, student-centered education, supportive teachers, and innovation. A minor concern was difficulty securing clinical practice due to language skills.
All 100% of reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.25/5. Students highlight a sense of belonging, welcoming staff, practical learning, and modern facilities. Some mention concern about course scheduling.
With a perfect 5/5 average rating from one review, this university is highly praised for its excellent teaching quality and strong international environment. Positive feedback highlights engaging academics and helpful support services.
All feedback is positive, with an average rating of 4.67/5 stars. Students highlight practical study experiences, excellent welfare and social activities, and a welcoming, diverse campus environment.
All 8 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.25/5. Students praise well-structured programs, approachable professors, and a strong sense of community. The city of Turku is also frequently mentioned as a positive aspect.
Nothing to show
Aalto University is honestly such an amazing place. The campus is right in the middle of nature, with woods and water all around. The student life here is super active, there are tons of student clubs that host different events all over the week, which provide great opportunities to make some new friends! One thing that really surprised me was how multidisciplinary the courses are. Being able to collaborate in diverse teams of designers and engineers is a rare opportunity that simply doesn't exist at many other institutions. It really pushes you to think outside the box and reflect more deeply on your work. P.S. If you’re lucky, you can even catch the Northern Lights right from campus!
Studying nursing at Xamk has been a practical and rewarding experience to me regardless of my previous background in-terms of profession. The programme strongly focuses on hands-on skills, simulation training, and clinical placements, which has helped me connect theory directly to real nursing practice. The teachers are supportive and approachable, and the learning environment encourages growth both professionally and personally, being able to also learn a new language (Finnish) within a short period of time with the help of Xamk has been a great milestone to me. Overall, Xamk has prepared me well for working life in healthcare.
In all honesty, my university offers a fantastic level of education, dedicated and extensively knowledgeable lecturers, as well as a spacious, clean, modern campus. These items make it a great place to study. However, one specific trait that bothers me personally is that some of the more important courses are limited to a single period (half a semester), to make space for other courses that I deem unnecessary or that could be optional instead of mandatory. Overall, my experience at Arcada has been outstanding.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
