Victor Babes University Of Medicine and Pharmacy - UMFT vs University of Cologne - UZK vs BI Norwegian Business School - BI vs University of Bergen vs NHH Norwegian School of Economics

Side-by-side comparison from 53 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Western Norway University of Applied Sciences (4.50)
Victor Babes University Of Medicine and Pharmacy - UMFT: wins 1/7 categories
University of Cologne - UZK: wins 0/7 categories
BI Norwegian Business School - BI: wins 0/7 categories
University of Bergen: wins 1/7 categories
NHH Norwegian School of Economics: wins 2/7 categories
South Carolina State University: wins 0/7 categories
Western Norway University of Applied Sciences: wins 3/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Medicine
Best programme: History
Best programme: Biomedical Sciences
Best programme: Economics and Finance
orangeburg, United States
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Engineering
Category ratings
Facilities
4.37
4.12
Not rated
4.00
4.71
Win
Not rated
3.50
Location
4.35
Win
4.30
Not rated
4.33
4.14
Not rated
3.00
Professors
4.32
4.12
Not rated
3.86
4.43
Not rated
4.50
Win
Internationality
3.55
4.16
Not rated
4.00
4.43
Not rated
4.50
Win
Student life
4.02
4.37
Not rated
4.43
Win
4.29
Not rated
3.50
Value
3.55
4.26
Not rated
4.14
4.14
Not rated
4.50
Win
Accommodation
3.97
3.64
Not rated
4.00
4.71
Win
Not rated
3.50
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Dedicated professors and valuable programs.
  • +Modern infrastructure and practical learning opportunities.
  • +Collaborative student environment and research chances.
  • +Excellent academic programs and research opportunities
  • +Supportive faculty and positive learning atmosphere
  • +Vibrant campus environment and city life

Nothing to show

  • +Excellent academic programs and knowledgeable professors
  • +Strong student support services and welfare provisions
  • +Vibrant international community and city-integrated campus life
  • +Free tuition and diverse program options
  • +High quality education and international exchange opportunities
  • +Supportive environment and welcoming community

Nothing to show

  • +Flexible online format and structure
  • +Career-focused and practical learning
  • +Supportive instructors and engaging lectures
Cons
  • -Poor quality of teaching and course materials.
  • -Unprofessional and unsupportive faculty.
  • -Lack of practical and engaging learning experiences.
  • -Overly demanding coursework and preparation requirements for math programs.
  • -Inconvenient class scheduling, including early morning times.

Nothing to show

  • -Outdated or problematic lecture streaming software hinders communication with instructors.
  • -Administrative and management issues create a frustrating student experience.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a recurring concern.
  • -Poor teaching quality and curriculum relevance are often criticized.

Nothing to show

  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause confusion and frustration.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support creates a negative student experience.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution receives notable scores for its facilities, professors, and location, all exceeding 4.3. Student life also scores well at 4.01. Areas receiving lower ratings include accommodation and internationality, both at 3.55, with value also scoring 3.55. Overall, the university's physical environment and academic staff are highly regarded, while international student experiences and perceived value could be areas for improvement.

This institution demonstrates considerable strengths, particularly in **Student Life** (4.37) and **Location** (4.3). **Value** (4.26) and **Internationality** (4.16) also received positive marks. Conversely, **Accomodation** (3.64) appears to be the weakest area, receiving a noticeably lower score compared to other aspects of the university experience. Ratings for **Facilities** and **Professors** are solid and consistent.

Nothing to show

This institution demonstrates excellent performance, with student life and location receiving the highest marks at approximately 4.43 and 4.33 respectively. Facilities, accommodation, and internationality are all rated a solid 4. Professors represent the weakest area, scoring 3.86. Overall, the university presents a well-rounded experience, with particular strengths in its vibrant student community and convenient setting.

This institution receives exceptionally high marks for its facilities and accommodation, both scoring an outstanding 4.7. Professors and internationality are also strong points, with ratings of 4.4. Student life and value for money are rated at 4.3 and 4.1 respectively. The university's location is its weakest area, though still a respectable 4.1.

Nothing to show

This institution demonstrates significant strengths in **Professors** and **Internationality**, both receiving top scores of 4.5. **Value** also stands out at a high 4.5. Conversely, **Location** received the lowest rating at 3. The remaining areas of Facilities, Student Life, and Accommodation are rated solidly at 3.5, indicating a generally positive, though not exceptional, experience in these aspects.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Most reviews highlight good professors, practical learning, and modern facilities. A small portion expresses concerns about unprofessionalism and poor translation of course materials.

With ~87% positive sentiment from 31 reviews, students praise excellent courses, dedicated faculty, and a vibrant academic and social environment. A small amount of negative feedback noted challenging coursework and scheduling issues.

Nothing to show

With a 4.14/5 average, reviews are overwhelmingly positive, highlighting a good learning environment and student welfare services. A small percentage (~14.3%) of feedback mentioned issues with lecture streaming software.

Reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~0% negative feedback. Students praise the free tuition and wide range of masters specializations, highlighting a conducive academic and diverse environment.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 4.5/5, student feedback is overwhelmingly positive. Reviews highlight convenience and structure in online formats, alongside supportive instructors and career-focused, practical learning.

Rating distribution
5★
67%
35%
0%
43%
29%
0%
50%
4★
17%
52%
0%
43%
57%
0%
50%
3★
0%
10%
0%
0%
14%
0%
0%
2★
17%
3%
0%
14%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Review

The top university is University of Cologne because of its thoughtfully constructed, secure, and accommodating environment, as well as its efficient and appropriate study facilities, I must say it is the best.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close