University of Passau vs BI Norwegian Business School - BI vs Bob Jones University vs University of Bergen vs NHH Norwegian School of Economics
Side-by-side comparison from 31 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Beautiful campus and student-friendly city
- +High-quality, unique academic programs and language courses
- +Active student life with many associations and events
- +Knowledgeable lecturers and strong academic environment
- +Practical approach and industry connections
- +Good location and food variety
- +Supportive and enthusiastic staff fostering a welcoming culture.
- +High-quality teaching and strong career preparation.
- +Modern facilities and adequate resources for enjoyable learning.
- +Excellent academic programs and knowledgeable professors
- +Strong student support services and welfare provisions
- +Vibrant international community and city-integrated campus life
- +Free tuition and diverse program options
- +High quality education and international exchange opportunities
- +Supportive environment and welcoming community
- +Accessible and supportive instructors
- +Engaging and well-structured courses
- +Strong career services and graduate support
- +Flexible online format and structure
- +Career-focused and practical learning
- +Supportive instructors and engaging lectures
- -Administrative and management issues
- -Lack of resources for certain faculties
- -Poor course quality and support
- -Students dislike the lack of proper support and communication from staff.
- -They often complain about outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources.
- -Students express frustration with the curriculum and teaching methods being unengaging or irrelevant.
- -Administrative and management issues are frequently cited.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment are a common complaint.
- -Lack of engagement and relevance in course content is a recurring problem.
- -Outdated or problematic lecture streaming software hinders communication with instructors.
- -Administrative and management issues create a frustrating student experience.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a recurring concern.
- -Poor teaching quality and curriculum relevance are often criticized.
- -administrative and management issues
- -lack of transparency and limited support
- -a disconnect between advertised quality and actual experience
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
- -Administrative and management issues cause confusion and frustration.
- -Lack of clear communication and support creates a negative student experience.
The university demonstrates its greatest strengths in Student Life, with an impressive rating of 4.44, closely followed by Location at 4.14. Conversely, Accomodation received the lowest score at 3.3. Other areas, including Professors (3.8) and Internationality (3.9), also performed well, while Facilities (3.64) and Value (3.62) landed in the mid-range.
This institution demonstrates remarkable strengths, with exceptional ratings for its Facilities, Professors, and Location, all scoring an impressive 4.5. Student Life and Internationality also receive solid marks at 4. However, Accommodations and Value emerge as areas needing development, each receiving a lower score of 3.
This institution boasts exceptional performance across most surveyed areas, with perfect scores for its facilities, professors, location, and accommodation. Student life and internationality also score highly at 4.5. The university is particularly recognized for its excellent value, receiving a perfect 5. The strongest areas are overwhelmingly positive, with only student life and internationality slightly below the maximum rating.
This institution demonstrates excellent performance, with student life and location receiving the highest marks at approximately 4.43 and 4.33 respectively. Facilities, accommodation, and internationality are all rated a solid 4. Professors represent the weakest area, scoring 3.86. Overall, the university presents a well-rounded experience, with particular strengths in its vibrant student community and convenient setting.
This institution receives exceptionally high marks for its facilities and accommodation, both scoring an outstanding 4.7. Professors and internationality are also strong points, with ratings of 4.4. Student life and value for money are rated at 4.3 and 4.1 respectively. The university's location is its weakest area, though still a respectable 4.1.
This university received uniformly average ratings of 1 across all evaluated categories. There are no standout strengths or weaknesses, indicating a consistent level of performance across facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value. The institution presents a balanced, albeit unremarkable, profile based on this assessment.
This institution demonstrates significant strengths in **Professors** and **Internationality**, both receiving top scores of 4.5. **Value** also stands out at a high 4.5. Conversely, **Location** received the lowest rating at 3. The remaining areas of Facilities, Student Life, and Accommodation are rated solidly at 3.5, indicating a generally positive, though not exceptional, experience in these aspects.
90% of reviews are positive, praising the beautiful campus, international subjects, and high-quality education. One negative review (10%) cited a lack of resources and support for Social Sciences.
With an average rating of 4/5, student feedback is highly positive. Reviewers consistently praise the great location, knowledgeable lecturers, and strong academic environment. Industry connections and a practical approach to education were also highlighted.
With 2 reviews and an average rating of 5/5, the feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students highlight enthusiastic staff, a welcoming culture, good teaching, and adequate modern facilities, preparing them well for careers.
With a 4.14/5 average, reviews are overwhelmingly positive, highlighting a good learning environment and student welfare services. A small percentage (~14.3%) of feedback mentioned issues with lecture streaming software.
Reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~0% negative feedback. Students praise the free tuition and wide range of masters specializations, highlighting a conducive academic and diverse environment.
Two reviews exist, both negative (1-2 stars) with an average rating of 1/5. Feedback highlights limited support, questionable transparency, and an internal culture needing improvement.
With an average rating of 4.5/5, student feedback is overwhelmingly positive. Reviews highlight convenience and structure in online formats, alongside supportive instructors and career-focused, practical learning.
The city is nice. A lot of students, great life. But the university is more and more turning into a company only caring about numbers and statistics but not about the students. If you study law or informatics your are fine. Business is also ok. Social Sciences which is the largest faculty gets less and less resources and we suffer from few poor courses and bad support.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show