The University of Hong Kong - HKU vs The Chinese University of Hong Kong - CUHK vs School of Professional and Continuing Education - HKU Space vs The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology - HKUST vs Lingnan University - LU
Side-by-side comparison from 53 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Excellent academic quality and teaching by profound scholars.
- +Vibrant campus life with global students and international cultures.
- +Strong career enhancement through industry exposure and mentorship.
- +Diverse student body and global perspectives.
- +Strong academic programs and practical skill development.
- +Supportive professors and excellent campus facilities.
- +Practical, experienced lecturers with industry networks
- +Valuable networking opportunities through facilitators and peers
- +Abundant free events and resources
- +Supportive professors and helpful administrators
- +Beautiful and modern campus environment
- +Ample career and extracurricular opportunities
- +Small university size, fostering close student-teacher relationships and a friendly learning environment.
- +Abundant opportunities for personal growth through experiential learning programs like service-learning and internships.
- +Supportive faculty and relevant coursework, particularly for understanding Hong Kong issues.
Nothing to show
- +Calm study spaces and good environment
- +Quality teaching and learning experience
- +Kind and genuine people
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
- -Overcrowding and lack of resources negatively impact the learning environment.
- -Poorly maintained and insufficient facilities.
- -Ineffective administrative and management decisions.
- -Lack of student representation in key decision-making processes.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Inconsistent teaching quality and lack of support are significant problems.
- -Administrative and management issues are a consistent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and inadequate resources hinder the learning experience.
- -Poor communication and a lack of student support create a negative environment.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Facilities are consistently described as outdated and poorly maintained.
- -Course content and teaching methods lack relevance and engagement.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and lack of support from staff are common complaints.
This institution receives high marks for its **location**, which scored a 4.44. Other strong areas include **facilities** (4.375), **professors** (4.333), and **value** (4.333). Areas scoring lower are **student life** (3.889) and **accommodation** (3.778), indicating these might be opportunities for improvement. **Internationality** also received a solid rating of 4.222.
An analysis of university ratings reveals strengths in academics and international appeal, with Professors and Value both scoring a high 4.3, and Internationality at 4. The university also received a solid 4 for Location. Student Life and Facilities are rated well, though slightly lower at 3.8 and 3.9 respectively. The weakest area identified is Accomodation, with a rating of 3.56.
Across all surveyed categories, this institution received a uniform rating of zero. This indicates no areas of particular strength or weakness were identified in the assessment of its facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, or overall value. The consistent score suggests a uniform lack of positive attributes or a complete absence of data in each evaluated aspect.
This institution receives strong marks for its facilities and value, both rated at 4.17. Professors and internationality are also well-regarded with scores of 4.0. Areas for potential improvement include student life (3.5), with location and accommodation scoring a slightly higher 3.67. Overall, the university demonstrates a solid performance across multiple facets.
An examination of the university's ratings reveals a consistent lack of scoring across all evaluated aspects. There are no standout strengths or notable weaknesses as every category, including Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, Accommodation, Internationality, and Value, has received a score of zero. This indicates a uniform absence of positive evaluation in all surveyed areas.
Nothing to show
This institution excels in several key areas, achieving perfect scores for its Facilities and Accommodations. The University also received strong ratings for its Location and overall Value. Student Life, while rated adequately, represents the area with the most room for improvement, scoring a 3. Internationality also stands out positively with a perfect score.
Nearly all student feedback is positive, with an average rating of 4.41/5. Students highlight excellent academics and dedicated professors, fostering personal growth. Campus life is described as vibrant and supportive.
About ~74% of reviews are positive, praising strong academics, interdisciplinary learning, and extensive campus facilities. A small ~8.3% of feedback mentions issues with WiFi, limited laundry facilities, and student representation in university appointments.
The single review is positive (100%), with an average rating of 4/5 stars. This feedback highlights an experienced lecturer with practical knowledge and networking opportunities, as well as helpful volunteer facilitators.
With an average rating of 4/5, students praise the scenic campus, supportive professors, and available opportunities. Though a small percentage of feedback mentions challenging accents and harsh grading, the majority is positive.
All feedback is positive, averaging 4.4/5 stars. Students praise the small campus size, supportive faculty, and numerous personal growth opportunities like service-learning programs.
Nothing to show
The sole reviewer found the university environment good, with calm study spaces and effective teaching. A slight lack of communication was noted, but kindness and genuineness were appreciated.
This opinion is made in respect of the Master of Law in Human Rights programme at HKU only ("Programme"). The Law Department offers its students many opportunities to be involved in extracurricular initiatives. For instance, the academic staff often hire student researchers and the Center for Comparative and Public Law frequently seek volunteers to assist in their seminars and conferences. One of the Programme's most notable opportunities is a grant with Open Society Foundations called the 'rights and governance internship'. The Law Department also has innovative street law and clinic initiatives. Further, many of its academic staff are legal practitioners and integrate anecdotes from their practices in the classroom, which is both interesting and beneficial to the learning environment. The class sizes are intimate and allow for in-depth discussions. The elective selection could be broader (the electives are also subject to last minute changes) and the compulsory courses are not the best-fitted for all students. Since the Programme accepts students without a law degree, it is sometimes difficult to reconcile the different backgrounds and meaningfully begin a legal discussion. Some students are in the Programme for the purpose of getting an 'easy' masters-level law degree. Overall, the Programme is terrific if you are proactive in seeking opportunities to advance your studies and pave a path for your next steps. You can build strong networks. Students entering with a more passive mindset may be disappointed with the experience though.
I don't know if it's because I major in Computer Science, but most of the professors who are in charge of the major courses teach very well. They have detailed explanations with step-by-step examples that are easy to learn. The student body is mostly locals and mainlanders but you can definitely find your own niche with international students as well and make friends from India, Indonesia, and Korea. I lived in CWChu College. They had three washing machines and four driers with a balcony where you could dry your clothes below the sun. The machines are usually free if its not near the weekends. The college is quite isolated but I'd say its facilities is one of the best. The food around university is mediocre, but you could eat out once a week and you should be fine. The food won't fit you if you have high standards. The campus is also the best in Hong Kong and the most university-like in terms of scale. The campus is closely intertwined with nature and you can definitely see and feel the greenness well. The buildings are quite old but they serve their purpose. In my opinion, CUHK is a decent university with great professors and students.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I've completed a Bachelor and a Master degree there. The uni is small (the smallest in HK), and to me it was just perfect, e.g. low student-to-faculty ratio, 100% on-campus housing, good food from the Chinese restaurant on campus. All academic building are within short walking distance, and you can reach a supermarket, post office and convenient store within a 10-minute walk. International students may find dorm life a bit challenging because only induction cooktops and microwaves are available and no cooking with fire is allowed in all student dorms.
Nothing to show
This university is really a known place. What I like about the uni is the study space is calm, and the environment is good. The study also taught me very well. What is disliked is it was a lack of communication between one another, but everyone was very kind and genuine.
