The University of Hong Kong - HKU vs The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology - HKUST vs Lingnan University - LU vs The Education University of Hong Kong - EdUHK vs ESEUNE Business School
Side-by-side comparison from 29 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Excellent academic quality and teaching by profound scholars.
- +Vibrant campus life with global students and international cultures.
- +Strong career enhancement through industry exposure and mentorship.
- +Supportive professors and helpful administrators
- +Beautiful and modern campus environment
- +Ample career and extracurricular opportunities
- +Small university size, fostering close student-teacher relationships and a friendly learning environment.
- +Abundant opportunities for personal growth through experiential learning programs like service-learning and internships.
- +Supportive faculty and relevant coursework, particularly for understanding Hong Kong issues.
- +Strong professor support and global opportunities
- +Pathway for aspiring teachers in Asian regions
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- +Calm study spaces and good environment
- +Quality teaching and learning experience
- +Kind and genuine people
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
- -Overcrowding and lack of resources negatively impact the learning environment.
- -Administrative and management issues are a consistent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and inadequate resources hinder the learning experience.
- -Poor communication and a lack of student support create a negative environment.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Facilities are consistently described as outdated and poorly maintained.
- -Course content and teaching methods lack relevance and engagement.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance.
- -Inefficient administrative processes and unclear communication.
- -Lack of support and resources for students.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and lack of support from staff are common complaints.
This institution receives high marks for its **location**, which scored a 4.44. Other strong areas include **facilities** (4.375), **professors** (4.333), and **value** (4.333). Areas scoring lower are **student life** (3.889) and **accommodation** (3.778), indicating these might be opportunities for improvement. **Internationality** also received a solid rating of 4.222.
This institution receives strong marks for its facilities and value, both rated at 4.17. Professors and internationality are also well-regarded with scores of 4.0. Areas for potential improvement include student life (3.5), with location and accommodation scoring a slightly higher 3.67. Overall, the university demonstrates a solid performance across multiple facets.
An examination of the university's ratings reveals a consistent lack of scoring across all evaluated aspects. There are no standout strengths or notable weaknesses as every category, including Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, Accommodation, Internationality, and Value, has received a score of zero. This indicates a uniform absence of positive evaluation in all surveyed areas.
This institution demonstrates considerable strengths, particularly in its **Facilities, Professors, Location, and Value**, all receiving a solid 4 out of 5. These areas suggest a well-equipped campus, quality instruction, a desirable setting, and good return on investment. Conversely, **Student Life, Accommodation, and Internationality** are rated slightly lower at 3, indicating there may be room for improvement in these aspects of the university experience.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This institution excels in several key areas, achieving perfect scores for its Facilities and Accommodations. The University also received strong ratings for its Location and overall Value. Student Life, while rated adequately, represents the area with the most room for improvement, scoring a 3. Internationality also stands out positively with a perfect score.
Nearly all student feedback is positive, with an average rating of 4.41/5. Students highlight excellent academics and dedicated professors, fostering personal growth. Campus life is described as vibrant and supportive.
With an average rating of 4/5, students praise the scenic campus, supportive professors, and available opportunities. Though a small percentage of feedback mentions challenging accents and harsh grading, the majority is positive.
All feedback is positive, averaging 4.4/5 stars. Students praise the small campus size, supportive faculty, and numerous personal growth opportunities like service-learning programs.
This university has a 4/5 average rating, with 100% of feedback being positive. Reviews highlight responsible and knowledgeable professors, as well as good global connections offering exchange and internship opportunities.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
The sole reviewer found the university environment good, with calm study spaces and effective teaching. A slight lack of communication was noted, but kindness and genuineness were appreciated.
This opinion is made in respect of the Master of Law in Human Rights programme at HKU only ("Programme"). The Law Department offers its students many opportunities to be involved in extracurricular initiatives. For instance, the academic staff often hire student researchers and the Center for Comparative and Public Law frequently seek volunteers to assist in their seminars and conferences. One of the Programme's most notable opportunities is a grant with Open Society Foundations called the 'rights and governance internship'. The Law Department also has innovative street law and clinic initiatives. Further, many of its academic staff are legal practitioners and integrate anecdotes from their practices in the classroom, which is both interesting and beneficial to the learning environment. The class sizes are intimate and allow for in-depth discussions. The elective selection could be broader (the electives are also subject to last minute changes) and the compulsory courses are not the best-fitted for all students. Since the Programme accepts students without a law degree, it is sometimes difficult to reconcile the different backgrounds and meaningfully begin a legal discussion. Some students are in the Programme for the purpose of getting an 'easy' masters-level law degree. Overall, the Programme is terrific if you are proactive in seeking opportunities to advance your studies and pave a path for your next steps. You can build strong networks. Students entering with a more passive mindset may be disappointed with the experience though.
Nothing to show
I've completed a Bachelor and a Master degree there. The uni is small (the smallest in HK), and to me it was just perfect, e.g. low student-to-faculty ratio, 100% on-campus housing, good food from the Chinese restaurant on campus. All academic building are within short walking distance, and you can reach a supermarket, post office and convenient store within a 10-minute walk. International students may find dorm life a bit challenging because only induction cooktops and microwaves are available and no cooking with fire is allowed in all student dorms.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This university is really a known place. What I like about the uni is the study space is calm, and the environment is good. The study also taught me very well. What is disliked is it was a lack of communication between one another, but everyone was very kind and genuine.
