Shaheed Zulfikar Ali Bhutto Institute of Science and Technology - SZABIST vs Jawaharlal Nehru Architecture and Fine Arts University - JNAFAU vs Osmania Univercity - OU vs Telengana University vs Vignana Bharathi Institute of Technology

Side-by-side comparison from 28 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Telengana University (5.00)
Shaheed Zulfikar Ali Bhutto Institute of Science and Technology - SZABIST: wins 0/6 categories
Jawaharlal Nehru Architecture and Fine Arts University - JNAFAU: wins 0/6 categories
Osmania Univercity - OU: wins 4/6 categories
Telengana University: wins 2/6 categories
Vignana Bharathi Institute of Technology: wins 0/6 categories
Keshav Memorial Engineering College: wins 0/6 categories
University of Hyderabad - Uoh/ Hcu: wins 0/6 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Bachelor of Business Administration
Best programme: Commerce
Hyderabad, India
5.00
Top
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Accounting and Finance
Category ratings
Facilities
3.69
Not rated
4.27
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Location
4.13
Not rated
4.55
Win
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
4.44
Not rated
4.45
Win
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
3.25
Not rated
4.00
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
4.07
Not rated
4.55
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Value
3.75
Not rated
4.27
Win
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
2.63
Not rated
3.40
4.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Supportive and qualified faculty providing engaging guidance.
  • +High-quality programs with a focus on student development.
  • +Inspiring atmosphere and excellent facilities.

Nothing to show

  • +Knowledgeable and supportive faculty
  • +Practical, application-focused education
  • +Active campus life and extracurriculars
  • +focus on sustainability and eco-friendly campus initiatives

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Inefficient administrative processes and poor communication are frustrating.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources hinder learning.
  • -Limited career support and unclear future prospects cause concern.

Nothing to show

  • -Students dislike administrative inefficiencies and poor management.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a common complaint.
  • -The curriculum and teaching methods are often seen as uninspiring or irrelevant.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder the learning experience.
  • -Poor communication and lack of transparency are recurring problems.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Academic and student life aspects generally shine, with **Professors** receiving the highest marks (4.44) and **Student Life** (4.07) and **Location** (4.13) also scoring well. Conversely, **Accomodation** presents a clear area for improvement, indicated by the lowest rating (2.63). **Facilities** (3.69) and **Value** (3.75) fall in the mid-range, while **Internationality** (3.25) scores moderately.

Nothing to show

This institution garners high marks in several key areas, particularly excelling in **Location** and **Student Life**, both receiving a rating of 4.55. **Professors** also score exceptionally well at 4.45. Conversely, **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest aspect, with a rating of 3.4. Other areas like **Facilities**, **Internationality**, and **Value** fall within a moderate to good range.

This institution excels in its facilities, earning a perfect score. It also performs well in professor quality, location, accommodation, internationality, and overall value, all receiving a strong 4 out of 5. The most significant area for improvement, however, is student life, which received a rating of 0.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4.06/5, approximately 75% of reviews are positive, highlighting friendly atmospheres, helpful teachers, and engaging classes. Negative feedback is minimal, representing about 0% of all feedback.

Nothing to show

Nearly all feedback is positive, with ~100% of 11 reviews rating 4-5 stars. Students praise supportive staff and knowledgeable professors, citing effective, practical education. Minor facility improvements were noted.

With a perfect 5/5 average rating from a single review, the feedback is overwhelmingly positive. The reviewer highlights academic excellence and sustainability, praising the university's eco-friendly initiatives like paperless classrooms and recycling programs.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
31%
0%
55%
100%
0%
0%
0%
4★
44%
0%
36%
0%
0%
0%
0%
3★
25%
0%
9%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close