Osun State University vs Grand Canyon University vs Adeleke University - AU vs Instituto Universitario de Tecnología Industrial Rodolfo Loero Arismendi vs Tanri Abeng University - TAU

Side-by-side comparison from 56 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Institut Supérieur des Professions Infirmières et des Techniques de Santé Agadir - ISPITS (5.00)
Osun State University: wins 0/7 categories
Grand Canyon University: wins 1/7 categories
Adeleke University - AU: wins 0/7 categories
Instituto Universitario de Tecnología Industrial Rodolfo Loero Arismendi: wins 0/7 categories
Tanri Abeng University - TAU: wins 0/7 categories
Oduduwa University: wins 0/7 categories
Institut Supérieur des Professions Infirmières et des Techniques de Santé Agadir - ISPITS: wins 6/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Industrial Relations
Post Falls, Idaho, United States
4.70
Read more reviews
12 reviews
×
Best programme: Civil Engineering
Best programme: Journalism and Mass Communication
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Biochemistry
Best programme: Social Assistance and Philosophy
Category ratings
Facilities
3.92
4.40
3.89
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
5.00
Win
Location
3.86
4.56
3.56
Not rated
Not rated
3.80
5.00
Win
Professors
4.24
4.08
3.89
Not rated
Not rated
4.20
5.00
Win
Internationality
3.66
3.92
3.11
Not rated
Not rated
3.40
5.00
Win
Student life
3.86
4.25
3.56
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
5.00
Win
Value
4.48
4.08
4.11
Not rated
Not rated
3.80
5.00
Win
Accommodation
3.66
4.18
Win
3.44
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
4.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Strong academic programmes and impactful lecturers
  • +Supportive learning environment and positive campus life
  • +Opportunities for professional development and practical experience
  • +Quality education and knowledgeable, supportive faculty
  • +Flexible online programs and accessible academic resources
  • +Faith-integrated learning environment and sense of community
  • +High-quality teaching and relevant programs
  • +Supportive and interactive learning environment
  • +Practical, industry-focused coursework and development

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Academic excellence and practical skill development
  • +Knowledgeable and supportive faculty
  • +Conducive learning environment with modern facilities
  • +Practical, skill-building experience and qualified instructors
  • +Well-structured program balancing theory and practice
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning and comfort.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are a persistent problem.
  • -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant or poorly implemented.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of support for student well-being is a major concern.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration and inefficiency.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance create an unpleasant learning environment.
  • -Inconsistent teaching quality and lack of academic support are significant concerns.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support negatively impacts the student experience.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution receives its highest marks for **Value**, followed closely by its **Professors**. Areas performing less strongly include **Accomodation** and **Internationality**, which share the lowest ratings. **Facilities**, **Location**, and **Student Life** fall within the mid-range, indicating a generally positive, though not outstanding, experience across these aspects.

This university receives particularly strong marks for its **Location**, rated at 4.56, and **Facilities**, scoring 4.4. Student life and accommodation also score well. The area with the lowest rating is **Internationality**, at 3.92. Professors and value for money are both rated moderately, around 4.08.

A comprehensive assessment reveals a university excelling in **Value**, achieving a rating of 4.11. Facilities and Professors also received strong scores around 3.89. Conversely, **Internationality** emerged as the weakest area, scoring 3.11. Location and Student Life were rated moderately at 3.56, with Accommodation scoring 3.44. The university demonstrates a generally positive, albeit varied, performance across these key indicators.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

With strong performance in teaching quality and student engagement, this institution garners high marks for its professors (4.2) and student life (4). Location and perceived value also stand out with respectable scores of 3.8. However, areas requiring attention include facilities and accommodation, both rated at 3, indicating potential for improvement in these fundamental aspects of the student experience.

This institution achieves near-perfect scores across most surveyed areas, excelling in Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, Internationality, and Value. The sole area showing a slight dip, though still strong, is Accomodation, rated at a commendable 4. Overall, the university presents a robust and highly-rated educational experience.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With a 4.28 average rating from 29 reviews, ~93% highlight a positive learning environment and supportive lecturers. Some students noted issues with campus locations and accommodations.

Reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~92% of feedback highlighting quality education, knowledgeable and helpful faculty, and modern infrastructure. Flexibility, particularly with online programs, is also frequently praised.

With a 3.89 average rating from 9 reviews, ~89% are positive. Students highlight academic quality and a supportive environment, while ~11% note challenges with campus facilities like water and cafeteria food.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

With a 4.2/5 average rating, ~80% of reviews are positive, highlighting academic excellence, entrepreneurship, and supportive professors. A small amount of feedback (~20%) mentions slow administrative processes.

The single review is positive, with a 5/5 average rating. This reflects ~100% positive feedback, highlighting a well-structured program, qualified instructors, and beneficial clinical placements.

Rating distribution
5★
38%
75%
0%
0%
0%
40%
100%
4★
52%
17%
89%
0%
0%
40%
0%
3★
10%
8%
11%
0%
0%
20%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
My experience at uniosun

My experience at university was a great one, the school infrastructure, lectures, the administration to the student there is amazing, first one thing I like about my school is that we don't take nonsense, if you misbehave you're out , and uniosun is academic calendar is very fast *I don't think I hate anything about the school, apart from even classes *Improvement: they should work on their hostel and security That all

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

A university in development

It’s a university that treats its students as part of a family. The lecturers are invested in the personal growth and development of the students and their understanding of the course. However, the university is still in development making it under equipped with facilities

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close