emlyon business school vs New York University Shanghai - NYU Shanghai vs Hult International Business School vs Istituto Marangoni vs L'École de Design Nantes Atlantique

Side-by-side comparison from 132 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: emlyon business school (4.50)
emlyon business school: wins 3/6 categories
New York University Shanghai - NYU Shanghai: wins 0/6 categories
Hult International Business School: wins 2/6 categories
Istituto Marangoni: wins 1/6 categories
L'École de Design Nantes Atlantique: wins 0/6 categories
INSEEC Business School: wins 0/6 categories
ISDI Madrid Digital Business School: wins 0/6 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Programme Grande Ecole (PGE)
London, The United Kingdom
4.30
Read more reviews
63 reviews
×
Best programme: International Business
London, The United Kingdom
3.70
Read more reviews
3 reviews
×
Best programme: International Fashion Business
Best programme: Art and Design
Best programme: Digital Marketing
Category ratings
Facilities
4.22
Win
Not rated
4.16
3.33
4.00
3.43
Not rated
Location
4.66
Not rated
4.61
4.67
Win
3.00
4.64
Not rated
Professors
4.12
Not rated
4.49
Win
4.33
4.00
3.86
Not rated
Internationality
4.63
Not rated
4.79
Win
4.67
4.00
4.50
Not rated
Student life
4.30
Win
Not rated
4.20
3.67
3.00
4.07
Not rated
Value
4.49
Win
Not rated
4.15
4.33
4.00
3.64
Not rated
Accommodation
4.00
Not rated
3.29
4.00
4.00
2.50
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Practical, international focus and diverse student body.
  • +Strong career support and professional experience opportunities.
  • +Diverse program options and personal project development.

Nothing to show

  • +Strong networking and career opportunities
  • +Practical, real-world learning experiences
  • +Supportive and experienced faculty
  • +Global fashion hub and career opportunities
  • +Inspiring teachers and valuable learning experiences
  • +Supportive environment & welcoming community
  • +Prestigious European university for design
  • +Focus on practical application over theory
  • +Practical, group-focused learning and professional initiation.
  • +High-quality teaching and supportive faculty mentorship.
  • +Strong professional network and vibrant student life.

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and unclear expectations lead to dissatisfaction.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues are prevalent.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient materials are a concern.
  • -Inconsistent professor quality and teaching methods are disliked.
  • -Administrative and management issues create confusion and frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Communication breakdowns and lack of transparency are significant problems.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Facilities are outdated and poorly maintained.
  • -Ineffective teaching and curriculum create learning difficulties.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance.
  • -Lack of student support and responsiveness from administration.
  • -Uninspiring curriculum and teaching methods.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution demonstrates a generally positive standing, with its strongest areas being **Location** and **Internationality**, both scoring above 4.6. **Student Life** and **Value** also received high marks, around 4.3 and 4.49 respectively. The **Facilities** and **Professors** are rated well, in the low 4s. **Accomodation** appears to be the relatively weakest area, with a score of 4.

Nothing to show

With high scores across most aspects, this institution excels in **Internationality** (4.79) and **Location** (4.61). Professors also receive strong marks (4.49). The weakest area for the university is **Accomodation**, which received a considerably lower rating (3.29) compared to other surveyed categories. Facilities (4.16), Student Life (4.20), and Value (4.15) fall within a solid mid-range.

This institution shines particularly brightly in its **Location** and **Internationality**, both receiving excellent scores. **Professors** and **Value** also stand out as strong points. Conversely, the **Facilities** represent the weakest area, scoring considerably lower than other aspects. **Student Life** and **Accomodation** fall in the mid-range, indicating areas for potential improvement but also solid performance.

Offering a well-rounded experience, this institution excels in its facilities, professor quality, accommodation, and internationality, all receiving a strong rating of 4. While student life and location are rated a respectable 3, these areas represent opportunities for improvement compared to its more robust aspects. Overall, the university presents a very positive offering.

This university demonstrates notable strengths in its **Location**, receiving a high rating of 4.64. **Student Life** and **Internationality** are also well-regarded. Conversely, **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest area, with a significantly lower score of 2.5. Other aspects like **Facilities**, **Professors**, and **Value** fall within a moderate to good range.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~90% 4-5 stars) with an average rating of 4.53/5. Students praise the academic rigor, practical and international focus, and diverse student body.

Nothing to show

Overwhelmingly positive feedback highlights excellent career opportunities, networking, and practical learning experiences. A small percentage of reviews mention issues with professor quality and program materials.

With a 3.67 average rating, positive feedback (~33%) highlights fashion business opportunities and inspiring teachers. No negative reviews were provided.

The university receives strong positive feedback, with 100% of reviews being positive. Students highlight a welcoming environment for international students and supportive teachers. Some desire more challenging main projects and theoretical lectures.

Most student feedback is positive (~63% 4-5 stars), highlighting excellent pedagogy, practical experiences, and supportive staff. The average rating is 3.81/5, with no negative reviews.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
63%
0%
54%
33%
0%
21%
0%
4★
27%
0%
30%
0%
100%
50%
0%
3★
10%
0%
13%
67%
0%
43%
0%
2★
0%
0%
2%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
3%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

DIVERSITY

One of my favourite aspects about Hult is its diversity. By meeting people from all over the world with diverse histories and customs, you can get a sense of what their home nations are like. I also enjoy the help the staff provides every step of the way.

Educational content

I like a lot of it but I feel like the subject teaches us the same every time. There should be more diversity in our contents and make us work more in groups and do more exercises in class, in order words the classes should be more dynamic

Nothing to show

Learning in a practical way

This university has a lot of qualities such as adapting to students in order to optimize learning, and the desire to confront the student as quickly as possible with the world of work. On the other hand, I would criticize this school for poorly disseminated information and a gloomy community life.

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close