Universidad estatal de Guayaquil - UG vs University of Applied Science Wiener Neustadt - FHWN vs FOM University of Applied Sciences for Economics and Management vs Schellhammer Business School vs The Lisbon MBA

Side-by-side comparison from 25 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Universidad estatal de Guayaquil - UG: wins 0/4 categories
University of Applied Science Wiener Neustadt - FHWN: wins 0/4 categories
FOM University of Applied Sciences for Economics and Management: wins 2/4 categories
Schellhammer Business School: wins 0/4 categories
The Lisbon MBA: wins 1/4 categories
Texila American University: wins 1/4 categories
University of Guyana - Mrs: wins 0/4 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Accounting and Business Finance
Best programme: Bachelor in International Business
Best programme: Human Resource Management
Best programme: Business Administration and Economics
Lisbon, Portugal
4.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: MBA International Business
East Bank Demerara, Guyana
5.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Medicine and Surgery
East Bank Demerara, Guyana
3.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
4.25
4.00
5.00
Win
2.00
4.00
Not rated
3.00
Location
4.25
3.50
5.00
1.89
5.00
5.00
3.00
Professors
4.40
4.25
5.00
2.44
4.00
5.00
4.00
Internationality
4.00
4.50
4.00
2.89
5.00
5.00
3.00
Student life
4.00
3.67
3.00
2.00
Not rated
5.00
Win
3.00
Value
4.20
4.25
5.00
Win
1.67
4.00
3.00
4.00
Accommodation
3.75
3.33
3.00
2.00
4.00
Win
3.00
2.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Passionate professors and enriching practical/theoretical learning
  • +Opportunities for self-improvement and exposure to new environments/people
  • +Diverse faculties and recognized programs within Ecuador
  • +Flexible and practical part-time programs
  • +Experienced and knowledgeable lecturers
  • +Small, organized structure for easy communication
  • +Practical and theoretical learning relevance for careers
  • +Qualified professors with industry experience
  • +Collaborative learning through shared practical experiences
  • +International environment and diverse professors
  • +Attractive location and lifestyle
  • +Engaging lectures and beneficial academic programs
  • +Real-world application & expert instructors
  • +Transformative, beyond traditional learning
  • +International cohort diversity
  • +Diverse student body and multicultural interactions
  • +Abundant resources and supportive lecturers

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are frequent complaints.
  • -Lack of clear communication and organizational issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Students express dissatisfaction with the quality and accessibility of resources and support.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Communication breakdowns and a lack of support are prevalent concerns.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of support and clear communication is frustrating.
  • -Administrative and management issues lead to inconsistent practices and poor communication.
  • -Lack of accreditation and recognition invalidates degrees and wastes money.
  • -Unreliable course delivery and abrupt program changes disregard student efforts.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring problem.
  • -Administrative issues and lack of responsiveness from staff cause frustration.
  • -The curriculum feels irrelevant and disconnected from current industry needs.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Facilities are often outdated and poorly maintained.
  • -The curriculum is frequently perceived as irrelevant or too theoretical.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Overall, this institution garners positive feedback. Its strongest areas are **Professors**, receiving a near-perfect score, and **Facilities**, **Location**, and **Value**, all scoring above 4.2. **Accommodations** present the only area falling below a 4.0 rating, marking it as the weakest aspect. The university also fares well in **Student Life** and **Internationality**.

With most aspects scoring a solid 4 or higher, this institution excels in **Internationality** and **Value**, both rated at 4.33. **Professors**, **Location**, and **Student Life** are also highly regarded, each receiving a score of 4. The **Accomodation** stands at a respectable 3.5, while **Facilities** represent the lowest-rated area at 3.67.

This institution excels significantly in its facilities, professor quality, and overall value, all receiving perfect scores. Its location also garners top marks. Areas for improvement are student life and accommodation, both rated moderately. Internationality is a strong point, though not as high as the leading categories.

Analysis of university ratings reveals a varied picture. The institution excels in **Internationality**, receiving a strong 2.89. Conversely, **Value** is the weakest area, scoring a low 1.67. Other aspects, including Facilities, Professors, Student Life, and Accommodation, fall within a similar moderate range, generally around the 2.0 mark.

This institution demonstrates a strong showing in several key areas. Its location and internationality are particularly well-regarded, both receiving perfect scores. Facilities, professors, and accommodation also score highly, indicating a solid overall experience. However, student life emerges as a significant weakness, with a rating of zero. This suggests a need for considerable improvement in campus engagement and activities for students.

This institution excels in several key areas, boasting perfect scores for its professors, location, student life, and internationality. However, its facilities received a zero rating, indicating a significant area for improvement. Accommodation and value for money are rated moderately, suggesting a balanced but not exceptional experience in these aspects.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

The university receives very positive feedback, with ~100% of reviews being favorable. Students appreciate the enriching learning environments and the opportunity for self-improvement.

All four reviews are positive, resulting in an average rating of 4.25/5. Students praise the program structure, experienced professors, and practical, well-organized offerings. There is no negative feedback in this sample.

The single review is highly positive, giving a 5/5 rating. This feedback highlights a good blend of theoretical and practical learning, relevant to future careers, and qualified professors.

Negative feedback dominates, with ~56% of reviews expressing significant dissatisfaction regarding academic recognition and inconsistent practices. Positive comments highlight location and international atmosphere.

With an average rating of 4/5, one review indicates a highly positive student experience. This feedback highlights transformative education, industry expert professors, and practical, strategic learning through real-world scenarios and hands-on projects.

With a perfect 5/5 average rating, all feedback is positive. Students highlight a diversity of international students and available resources. Admin staff are noted for needing improvement.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
29%
20%
100%
0%
0%
100%
0%
4★
43%
80%
0%
22%
100%
0%
0%
3★
29%
0%
0%
22%
0%
0%
100%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
56%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Professors & Opportunities for Entrepreneurs

I'm currently in my fourth semester of the International Business Consultancy bachelor program, which is fully in English and has a highly international demographic. The week-to-week lectures are generally very theory-based but they do provide a solid foundation for business principles that are essential for creating value and ensuring the profitability of a business. What stands out about this program are the professors. A great deal of them are hired externally and have succesful careers in their respective area of business (marketing, finanace, or management.) This has been very valuable because it allows students to network with current business professionals. There are also many opportunites for students with an entrepreneurial spirit. The university is very supportive of students that want to start their own business or have creative business ideas (bonus points if it's a sustainable business idea). I truly believe that students "get back what they put in" when it comes to this program. Also, the university is only 30-minutes by train to Vienna!

Good theory-practice mix, qualified professors

In my opinion, it was a good mix of theoretic and action-based learning and therefore relevant for the job. The professors were very qualified and also had work experience. The exchange between students about the practical experience is part of the classes and helps to learn different perspectives.

Avoid it if you can.

I have just done my Masters at SBS (MA in Organisational Psychology) and below I want to provide the full, unfortunately not so positive, picture. I have no clue where all the positive reviews are coming from – most likely they are paying for them as 99% of them do not reflect reality at all. As it doesn't fit in 1 review, I will split it, to offer the full picture. Contact me if you’d like to know more. Let's start positively – I have met several very knowledgeable and nice people among the teachers. Some are truly willing to teach you and help you grow. But do note that these people are not paid enough and outside of their actual teaching hours which means you will receive little to no support outside class unless the teacher is willing to go the extra mile with no compensation. This is where the „positives“ end. Organisationally – tuition fees are unclear, they will charge you whatever they can get away with based on your nationality (e.g. Mozambique 700eur to Netherlands 12000eur so quite the range) and you will find out randomly when you talk to your peers after enrolling. This will be labelled as „scholarship“ but it doesn’t have anything to do with your previous grades or performance. Everything is payable as opposed to standard practice in serious academic institutions - for example if you need thesis deadline extension, it is, of course, possible - for about 2K EUR. Everything and anything you pay them is non-refundable, of course. There is also insanely high staff turnover, as usually the better teachers leave the moment they find a better job in the area - often these teachers must teach there because the job market in Malaga/Cadiz province is ridiculously saturated and it is not easy to find another employment. Career days are a joke – people from hotels come to recruit cheap labour (600eur/month internship or unpaid at all) but no real professional opportunities are offered – if by some miracle you find anything suitable for you, the uni will charge you money as they have „provided“ you with this opportunity. Personally I was advised and referred several times by a staff member who went the extra mile with my CV and job applications but this is not the norm, as they definitely don't have the resources to do this for everyone. Academically – they should not have the right to call themselves a higher educational institution. There is no clear curriculum, they are changing subjects all the time – if you dared to apply it will certainly not be the same subjects as are listed on the website. For which they have a little legal note written there but that is just to cover their behinds obviously. Teachers are preparing their own syllabus with almost a free-hand, often far from what would be challenging on an actual Masters academical level. Unfortunately, AI use for cheating purposes is not strictly punished - oftentimes students will get away with it despite the instructors' full awareness of this practice, as the instructors do not have the resources to penalise everyone for it as would be the standard practice in any other reputable academic institution. It's very demotivating to be putting in organic, honest work while many just pass by using AI for every single thought they're supposed to produce scot-free. Language classes are a joke – they do not offer ANY of the languages listed online as they do not have the teachers for them. There is a Spanish class – divided between beginners and those who have already come across it, so if you’d think of improving your Spanish from B2 and higher level - don‘t even think about it as the „non-beginner“ class will not be challenging enough by far. There are English classes which are „mandatory“ for students with lack of English skills but again, no courses on e.g. Business English provided, which are a standard at other universities. Thesis writing is an absolute chaos. The guidelines are extremely vague and sometimes conflicting with what is said in class. Do not expect actual academic support – you will choose your topic and you’ll be asigned „Thesis Advisor“ which will be one of the underpaid teachers who will NOT be informed of this assignment and thus will NOT be compensated for it (as they are only paid for teaching hours and not full-time). This means that depending on your TA you will either receive some minor support out of the potential „goodness“ of the specific teacher but in reality, all is decided and „reviewed“ by the Dean - currently Prof. Sousa. „Reviewed“ is because he will only judge based on whether you have followed their template mainly regarding formatting but not content. Which means when you ask for feedback on your 60 page document you’ll often receive „Please follow the template“ which will get your thesis to „passing“ grade but if you want to actually better yourself in academic research and writing, don’t expect that here since their regular procedure doesn't strive to help every student get to their best. Grading is thus based not on content or someone actually thoroughly reading your thesis (nor there are clear grading guidelines as is more than common in other universities). Facilities – the building on campus is okay, but doesn‘t reflect the tuition amount at all. It is far from everything which means you either have to pay for school bus (expensive), figure out Spanish public transport (bus is about 7min walk) or have a car/motorcycle. There is a cafe on campus which is owned by the owners of SBS with a minor discount for SBS students but that means that there is not even a microwave or water kettle available for students - so that they would go spend money in that cafe if they want to have hot meal during their day. For people considering to apply: please be warned – if you can choose another institution for your development, do so. This university will not challenge you academically nor professionaly. It is a deceiving marketing practice at the very least – scam is the correct word unfortunately. Students that were seen sleeping/obviously using AI to answer absolutely basic (definitely not Masters level of knowledge required) questions asked by teachers IN CLASS then use AI to write on their LinkedIn how enriching and challenging this experience was after their graduation. Moreover, the university praises and advocates for the above mentioned fake social media behaviour even though they are well-aware of the scam they are running and the quality of students they enroll – no entrance exams required, of course. In fact, the university administration used AI to prepare their graduation speech for last year :) Make of that what you will. If you have applied and now cannot go back as you would loose all the tuition fees paid: challenge yourself during this time. Make sure to do all your courses diligently so that you can make the most out of this experience focusing on your academic growth. Ask an external thesis advisor to guide you if you want to actually improve your academic research and writing skills. Do the voluntary tasks during the courses, ask the teachers you deem knowledgeable and interesting for more info about their field of expertise, additional literature etc. You have to make it count yourself, as no one else will in this place – once you paid, your growth and development is irrelevant to the university with the exception of a few staff members that care. I have also submitted this review via Google, see how they don't reply as opposed to the positive ones, because they know all of the above is true :)

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close