Cleveland State University - CSU vs Ravensbourne University London vs Universitas Dian Nuswantoro - UDINUS vs Universitas Sam Ratulangi - UNSRAT vs University Gregório Semedo - UGS
Side-by-side comparison from 116 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Exceptional faculty expertise and mentorship
- +Excellent learning opportunities and engaging instruction
- +Welcoming and supportive environment with top-notch amenities
- +Industry connections and career readiness
- +Practical, hands-on learning and skill development
- +Inspiring and welcoming creative environment
- +Strong computer science program
- +Convenient central location
- +Supportive personal development environment
- +Community building and networking opportunities
- +Practical, real-world learning experiences
- +Supportive and effective teaching staff
Nothing to show
- +Accessible learning resources and opportunities
- +Patient, effective teachers
- +Well-equipped labs and comfortable facilities
- +Engaging cultural and educational events
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a persistent problem.
- -Inflexible and unresponsive administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Lack of engaging and relevant teaching methods leads to disinterest.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources are a problem.
- -Inconsistent teaching quality and course structure is disappointing.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of practical application and industry relevance in coursework is a concern.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are major concerns.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -The curriculum lacks relevance and practical application.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
- -Course content is often irrelevant and poorly structured.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and lack of support from staff are significant problems.
- -Inflexible policies and bureaucratic processes create frustration.
This institution garners excellent reviews, particularly for its professors, who received the highest marks. Students also appreciate the location and facilities. Areas for potential improvement include accommodation and the value proposition, though these still maintain solid scores. Overall, the university presents a well-rounded and positive student experience.
The university demonstrates considerable strengths in its **location**, receiving a high rating of 4.33. **Facilities** also score well at 4.17. Conversely, **accommodation** stands out as the weakest area, with a rating of 2.92. **Student life** is another area that could see improvement, scoring 3.33. Other aspects like professors, internationality, and value are rated moderately.
This institution demonstrates remarkable strength across most surveyed aspects. Facilities, professors, location, student life, internationality, and overall value all received a solid four out of five stars. However, the accommodation rating stands out as a significant weakness, scoring a zero, indicating a critical area for improvement.
With a standout score of 5 for both Professors and Location, this university excels in academic quality and its advantageous setting. Student Life also garners strong marks at 4.5. However, Internationality presents a notable weakness with a score of 2.5. Facilities and Accommodation are rated moderately at 3.5, while Value is positive at 4.
Nothing to show
Receiving perfect scores in every category, this university demonstrates exceptional strength across the board. From state-of-the-art facilities and highly-rated professors to vibrant student life and excellent value, all aspects of the student experience are rated at the highest level. There are no apparent weak areas, indicating a consistently outstanding offering in all surveyed domains.
This institution receives outstanding marks, particularly excelling in Professor quality, Location desirability, and vibrant Student Life, all earning perfect scores. Accommodations and Internationality are also highly rated. Facilities are considered strong. The most notable area for improvement, relative to its otherwise excellent scores, is Facilities, though it still garners a positive rating.
Nearly all (98 out of 99) reviews are positive, with students praising excellent faculty, strong mentorship, engaging instruction, and useful course material. They also highlight good amenities and an inclusive environment. No negative feedback was reported.
With ~74% positive feedback, students highlight Ravensbourne's inspirational environment, industry connections, and focus on digital and creative learning. No negative feedback was reported.
The university is highly rated (4/5 stars), with ~100% of feedback being positive. Students appreciate the opportunities for personal and academic development, particularly in Computer Science, and its central location. Limited parking is a minor concern.
With a 3.5/5 average rating from two reviews, approximately 50% are positive. Students highlighted positive campus culture and engaging professors. There is no negative feedback reported.
Nothing to show
With a 5/5 average rating from one review, this university is highly praised. Positive feedback highlights satisfaction with the opportunities provided. There is no negative feedback.
With a perfect 5/5 average rating and 100% positive feedback, students praise well-equipped labs, patient teachers, and air-conditioned rooms. Monthly cultural and educational activities are also highlighted as a positive aspect.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show