Universidad de los Andes - ULA vs Universidad Católica de Córdoba - UCC vs Brunel University London vs Rochester Institute of Technology - RIT vs The Northern School Of Art - NSA

Side-by-side comparison from 190 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Universidad Católica de Córdoba - UCC (4.70)
Universidad de los Andes - ULA: wins 1/5 categories
Universidad Católica de Córdoba - UCC: wins 1/5 categories
Brunel University London: wins 0/5 categories
Rochester Institute of Technology - RIT: wins 1/5 categories
The Northern School Of Art - NSA: wins 0/5 categories
University of Agder - uia: wins 0/5 categories
Abbottabad University Of Science And Technology: wins 2/5 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Accounting
Best programme: Administration
London, The United Kingdom
4.10
Read more reviews
119 reviews
×
Best programme: Computer Science
Rochester, New York, United States
4.20
Read more reviews
39 reviews
×
Best programme: Biology
Middlesbrough, The United Kingdom
3.00
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: Graphic Design
Kristiansand, Norway
4.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Renewable Energy Engineering
Best programme: Accounting
Category ratings
Facilities
3.67
4.29
3.98
4.24
3.00
5.00
5.00
Location
3.00
3.57
3.72
3.89
3.00
4.00
4.50
Win
Professors
5.00
4.88
4.03
4.38
3.50
4.00
5.00
Internationality
3.33
3.88
4.33
4.36
Win
3.00
4.00
2.50
Student life
3.67
4.29
3.83
4.31
2.50
4.00
4.50
Win
Value
4.33
Win
4.13
4.13
4.10
3.50
4.00
4.00
Accommodation
2.33
4.29
Win
3.61
4.03
4.00
4.00
3.50
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +High academic excellence and expert professors
  • +Focus on personal and professional growth
  • +Strong ethical and values-based education
  • +Highly qualified and inspiring professors
  • +Welcoming and supportive environment with good infrastructure
  • +Valuable networking opportunities and a strong educational foundation
  • +Practical, career-focused learning with industry relevance
  • +Supportive and engaging teaching staff
  • +Accessible campus and useful resources
  • +Supportive faculty and engaging academic environment
  • +Modern facilities and vibrant campus life
  • +Welcoming atmosphere and diverse community
  • +Passionate and supportive staff fostering happiness and personal drive
  • +Emphasis on individual happiness and progress over external pressures
  • +Welcoming international environment and modern facilities
  • +Excellent research opportunities and advanced tools
  • +Knowledgeable and supportive professors
  • +Quality education and affordable tuition
  • +Cooperative and highly skilled staff
  • +Positive and best-in-class environment
Cons
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of essential resources like functioning equipment.
  • -Administrative and management issues, including poor communication and inefficient processes.
  • -Limited access to necessary support services and a lack of flexibility from staff.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder learning.
  • -The curriculum lacks relevance and practical application.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a significant concern.
  • -Outdated course content and confusing teaching methods are frustrating.
  • -Poor communication and lack of professionalism are prevalent.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment are a common complaint.
  • -Lack of resources and support negatively impacts the learning experience.
  • -Outdated curriculum and ineffective teaching methods.
  • -Poor administrative and management support.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a significant concern.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources are frequently criticized.
  • -Course content and teaching quality are often found to be subpar.
  • -Students are frustrated by administrative and management issues.
  • -They find the facilities outdated and lacking in necessary resources.
  • -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant and poorly structured.
Rating summary
What students say

Overall, this institution receives strong marks for its faculty, with a perfect score for professors. Value is also a significant strength. However, accommodation stands out as a considerable weakness, scoring the lowest. The university also performs moderately well in facilities and student life, while location and internationality are rated acceptably.

Overall, the university receives strong marks, particularly in its faculty expertise, where it achieved an impressive 4.875. Student life, facilities, and accommodation were also highly rated, all scoring 4.28. Internationality and value received solid scores of 3.875 and 4.125 respectively. The location was the lowest-rated aspect, coming in at 3.57.

This institution garners a strong overall rating, particularly excelling in **Internationality** with a score of 4.33. **Professors** and **Value** also receive high marks. Conversely, **Accomodation** and **Location** present the weakest areas, scoring 3.61 and 3.72 respectively. Facilities, student life, and professors all fall within a commendable 3.8 to 4.0 range.

Across key metrics, this institution demonstrates notable strengths in its **Professors** and **Internationality**, both receiving scores above 4.35. **Student Life** also garners excellent feedback, close behind. Conversely, the **Location** receives the lowest rating among the surveyed areas. Other aspects like **Facilities**, **Accomodation**, and **Value** fall within a good, solid range, indicating a generally positive but varied student experience.

This institution demonstrates a mixed but generally solid performance in its assessed areas. Its strongest suit is undoubtedly **accommodation**, receiving a high rating of 4. Conversely, **student life** emerges as the weakest area, scoring a comparatively low 2.5. Other aspects like facilities, professors, location, internationality, and value all fall within the moderate range, indicating areas that perform adequately without standing out significantly.

This institution garners high marks across most aspects, with outstanding facilities rated a perfect 5. Professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value all receive a solid 4. The strongest area is clearly its facilities, while the other evaluated categories demonstrate a consistently strong, though less exceptional, performance.

This institution garners excellent scores for its facilities and professors, both receiving perfect marks. Its location and student life also stand out positively. Conversely, accommodation and internationality represent the weakest aspects, with significantly lower ratings. The overall value of the university is rated quite well, suggesting a positive return for students.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With a ~89% positive sentiment, students praise the university's academic excellence, expert professors, and focus on personal/professional growth. Some note the program's scope and relevance. No negative feedback was provided.

With a 4.67/5 average rating, ~89% of reviews are positive. Students frequently highlight highly qualified, inspiring professors and a welcoming campus environment with excellent resources. No negative feedback was reported.

Over 97% of reviews are positive, highlighting career-focused degrees, practical learning, and supportive lecturers. A small amount of negative feedback mentions visa issues and course content clarity.

With an average rating of 4.18/5 from 39 reviews, approximately 93% of feedback is highly positive. Students frequently praise academic rigor, faculty support, modern facilities, and a vibrant campus life. No negative reviews were recorded.

Reviews are split, with positive feedback highlighting happiness and passion, while negative feedback points to outdated courses and staff lacking industry depth, representing about 50% of the feedback.

With one review, the average rating is 4 out of 5 stars, indicating a positive experience. The feedback highlights a welcoming international environment, modern facilities, and opportunities for research skill development.

With a 4.5/5 average rating from 2 reviews, this university is highly praised. All feedback was positive, with students highlighting quality education, cooperative staff, and a great environment.

Rating distribution
5★
67%
78%
32%
21%
50%
0%
50%
4★
22%
11%
55%
77%
0%
100%
50%
3★
11%
11%
10%
3%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
3%
0%
50%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
university in crisis

the chemical engineering study is a demanding university, always picks up in the ranking of the best university in the country, although in my career there are deficiencies in the reagents of laboratories because of the economic crisis that we live today since most of the reagents are imported

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close