Tokyo Metropolitan University - TMU vs Polytechnic Institute of Cávado and Ave - IPCA vs Ajeenkya D Y Patil University - ADYPU vs Asociación Colombiana de Facultades de Administración - ASCOLFA vs CESI

Side-by-side comparison from 7 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Ajeenkya D Y Patil University - ADYPU (5.00)
Tokyo Metropolitan University - TMU: wins 0/7 categories
Polytechnic Institute of Cávado and Ave - IPCA: wins 0/7 categories
Ajeenkya D Y Patil University - ADYPU: wins 7/7 categories
Asociación Colombiana de Facultades de Administración - ASCOLFA: wins 0/7 categories
CESI: wins 0/7 categories
Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia: wins 0/7 categories
Universidade do Sul de Santa Catarina - UNISUL: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Biological Sciences
Best programme: Computer Engineering
Best programme: MBA
Aix en Provence, France
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Graphic Design
Category ratings
Facilities
4.70
4.75
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Location
4.50
4.50
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Professors
4.70
4.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Internationality
3.50
3.75
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
2.00
Student life
3.20
3.75
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
Value
3.50
4.50
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
2.00
Accommodation
2.50
3.75
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +English-taught programs & international student support
  • +High-quality research & academic rigor
  • +Convenient location & exchange opportunities
  • +Engaging professors and practical, project-based learning
  • +Supportive community and good facilities
  • +Accessible fees and good food options
  • +Comprehensive academic and extracurricular development opportunities
  • +Supportive and healthy campus environment

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Excellent campus and facilities, particularly for design studies
  • +Comfortable and well-equipped learning spaces
  • +High-quality academic programs
Cons
  • -Inefficient administrative processes and poor communication.
  • -Outdated facilities and inadequate resources.
  • -Lack of engagement and uninspiring teaching.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are frequently mentioned.
  • -Students express frustration with administrative inefficiencies and lack of support.
  • -Course content and teaching methods are sometimes perceived as outdated or unengaging.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder the learning experience.
  • -Poor communication and lack of support from staff are frequently mentioned.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues are frequently mentioned.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment are a recurring concern.
  • -The curriculum is often described as irrelevant or poorly delivered.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution garners exceptional marks for its **facilities** and **professors**, both receiving a near-perfect 4.7. The **location** also scores highly at 4.5. However, **student life** and **accommodation** present significant areas for improvement, with ratings of 3.2 and 2.5 respectively. **Internationality** and **value** fall in the middle range, both at 3.5.

This institution shines brightest in its **Facilities**, boasting an impressive 4.75 score. It also scores highly for **Location** and **Value**, both at 4.5. Areas where performance is less robust include **Student Life**, **Accomodation**, and **Internationality**, all receiving a 3.75 rating. Professors are generally well-regarded with a score of 4.

Exceptional marks were awarded across the board, indicating a consistently outstanding university experience. All surveyed areas, including Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, Accommodation, Internationality, and Value, received a perfect score of 5 out of 5. This suggests there are no distinct weak areas, with the university excelling equally in every aspect evaluated.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This institution excels in its physical environment and academic offerings, reflected in strong ratings for facilities and professors. Location also received a favorable score. However, student life and accommodation fall into the mid-range. The university's weakest points appear to be its international inclusivity and perceived value, both scoring at the lower end of the spectrum.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Based on one review, this university has a high average rating of 4/5. Students appreciate the excellent research quality and English-taught programs, with ~100% positive feedback.

All four reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4/5 stars. Students highlight professors and hands-on learning as strengths, with some mentioning good facilities and accessible fees. There's no negative feedback.

The single review is highly positive, rating the university 5/5. It highlights opportunities for individual growth through diverse subjects and curriculums, alongside regular sports activities. The campus environment is also praised for its peace and healthfulness.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

With a single review, the university receives a 4/5 average rating. The feedback highlights a positive campus experience, particularly noting excellent design studies and comfortable, well-equipped classrooms. No negative feedback was reported.

Rating distribution
5★
0%
0%
100%
0%
0%
0%
0%
4★
100%
100%
0%
0%
0%
0%
100%
3★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close