University of Chichester vs Jordan University of Science and Technology - JUST vs Master D vs Kaaf University College - kaafuni vs Yarmouk University

Side-by-side comparison from 18 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
University of Chichester: wins 1/5 categories
Jordan University of Science and Technology - JUST: wins 3/5 categories
Master D: wins 0/5 categories
Kaaf University College - kaafuni: wins 0/5 categories
Yarmouk University: wins 1/5 categories
Sup de Vinci: wins 0/5 categories
The University of Asia Pacific: wins 0/5 categories
Comparing
Chichester, The United Kingdom
4.20
Read more reviews
10 reviews
×
Best programme: Global Management
Best programme: Architecture
Madrid, Spain
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Law
Best programme: Medicine
Paris, France
4.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Web Development
Best programme: Computer Science and Engineering
Category ratings
Facilities
4.22
Win
4.00
Not rated
4.00
3.00
3.00
4.00
Location
4.14
5.00
Not rated
2.00
5.00
3.00
5.00
Professors
4.40
4.25
Not rated
5.00
3.00
4.00
5.00
Internationality
3.80
4.25
Win
Not rated
3.00
3.00
2.00
4.00
Student life
4.11
4.75
Win
Not rated
4.00
4.00
3.00
4.00
Value
4.10
4.75
Win
Not rated
4.00
4.00
3.00
4.00
Accommodation
3.43
3.25
Not rated
3.00
5.00
Win
2.00
4.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Engaging, practical learning with supportive, expert professors
  • +Excellent student support for diverse needs and smooth transitions
  • +Vibrant social life, active societies, and a friendly, community atmosphere
  • +Strong engineering and technology programs
  • +Positive campus life and career development
  • +Supportive professors and colleagues

Nothing to show

  • +Supportive and effective lecturers
  • +Good facilities
  • +High-quality academic and teaching services
  • +Good surrounding amenities and transportation access
  • +Accessible and supportive instructors.
  • +Small class sizes and calm learning environment.
  • +Relevant, practical, and up-to-date curriculum.
  • +Supportive and approachable faculty
  • +Well-designed and engaging curriculum
  • +Positive and meaningful overall experience
Cons
  • -Lack of communication and transparency from administration.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment.
  • -Insufficient resources and support for students.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a recurring problem.
  • -Course content and delivery often fail to meet expectations.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are disappointing.
  • -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant or poorly structured.
  • -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
  • -Lack of efficient administrative support and poor communication.
  • -Inadequate course materials and outdated teaching methods.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a constant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources are frequently mentioned.
  • -The curriculum and teaching methods are often perceived as unengaging and irrelevant.
  • -Students dislike administrative and management issues.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a common complaint.
  • -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant or poorly implemented.
Rating summary
What students say

Assessed across several key areas, this university demonstrates notable strengths in its faculty, receiving a high rating for Professors. Student Life and Facilities also score well, indicating a positive environment and adequate resources. However, Accomodation stands out as the weakest area, with a significantly lower rating compared to other aspects. The university also performs reasonably well in Location, Internationality, and Value.

This institution garners strong praise in several key areas, notably achieving a perfect score for **Location** and a near-perfect rating for **Student Life** and **Value**. **Professors** and **Internationality** also received commendable scores. Conversely, **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest aspect, receiving a comparatively lower rating. **Facilities** are rated solidly, though not as highly as the leading categories.

Nothing to show

This institution shines with an exceptional rating for its professors, indicating a high quality of instruction. Facilities and student life also receive strong scores, suggesting a supportive and engaging environment. Conversely, the university's location presents a notable weakness, receiving a low score. Accommodation and internationality are rated moderately, offering a middle ground. Overall, the value proposition appears positive, as reflected in its solid rating.

This institution receives top marks for its **location** and **accommodation**, both scoring a perfect 5. Student life and overall value are also well-regarded, earning a 4. Conversely, the university's **facilities** and **internationality** are areas for potential improvement, each receiving a 3. Professor quality also sits at a moderate 3.

This institution demonstrates a solid performance in several key areas. Professors receive a strong rating of 4, indicating high quality instruction. Facilities, location, and value are all rated a respectable 3. However, accommodation and internationality present areas for improvement, both scoring a 2. Overall, the university offers a good experience with notable strengths in its academic staff.

This institution garners exceptional marks, particularly in the areas of **Professors** and **Location**, both achieving a perfect score of 5. Areas such as **Facilities**, **Student Life**, **Accommodation**, and **Internationality** are all rated solidly at 4, indicating a consistently positive experience. The university's **Value** also receives a respectable score of 4, rounding out its generally strong performance.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With a 4.2/5 average rating from 10 reviews, nearly all students highly praise the university. Recurring themes include supportive lecturers, excellent student support services, and engaging courses.

All four reviews are highly positive, with an average rating of 4.75/5. Students praise strong engineering and technology programs, good campus life, and impactful learning experiences. Some suggest more practical courses and new departments.

Nothing to show

The single review is highly positive, giving a 5/5 rating. This overwhelmingly positive feedback suggests excellent lecturers and good facilities, though customer service could be improved.

With a 4/5 average rating, the single review highlights strong academic and teaching quality. However, it notes weaknesses in extracurricular activities, such as a lack of facilities and general engagement.

With one review and an average rating of 4/5, feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students appreciate interesting classes, accessible teachers, and practical skills for professional preparation. Small class sizes also contribute to a calm environment.

With a perfect 5/5 average rating, the sole review highlights a positive and meaningful experience. This feedback emphasizes a well-planned program and experienced, supportive faculty.

Rating distribution
5★
30%
75%
0%
100%
0%
0%
100%
4★
60%
25%
0%
0%
100%
100%
0%
3★
10%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close