Universidad Tecnológica Nacional - UTN vs Universidad Nacional de Cuyo - UNCUYO vs University of Lausanne - UNIL vs Universidade Federal de Rondonópolis vs Muhammadiyah Jakarta University - UMJ

Side-by-side comparison from 23 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Universidad Nacional de Cuyo - UNCUYO (4.80)
Universidad Tecnológica Nacional - UTN: wins 0/7 categories
Universidad Nacional de Cuyo - UNCUYO: wins 3/7 categories
University of Lausanne - UNIL: wins 0/7 categories
Universidade Federal de Rondonópolis: wins 0/7 categories
Muhammadiyah Jakarta University - UMJ: wins 0/7 categories
KLE Institute of Technology: wins 4/7 categories
Aconcagua University - UdA: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Materials Engineering
Best programme: Industrial Engineering
Best programme: Biological Science
Best programme: Electronics and Communication Engineering
Mendoza, Argentina
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
3.30
4.40
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Location
4.20
4.60
4.50
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Professors
3.80
4.60
4.75
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Internationality
2.70
4.60
Win
3.75
Not rated
Not rated
1.00
Not rated
Student life
3.50
4.60
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Value
3.60
4.60
Win
4.50
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Accommodation
3.30
4.20
Win
3.75
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Strong engineering programs with good job prospects
  • +Dedicated and experienced teaching staff
  • +Flexible learning options and improving infrastructure
  • +Inspiring professionals and personalized support for growth
  • +Academic excellence and diverse program offerings
  • +Comfortable environment and beautiful surroundings
  • +Supportive lecturers & practical courses
  • +Active student life & events
  • +Flexible major changes

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Excellent campus facilities and top-tier education quality
  • +Approachable and friendly staff
  • +Abundant opportunities for co-curricular and extra-curricular growth

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues, including poor communication and unhelpful staff.
  • -Outdated curriculum and excessively long program duration.
  • -Unattractive and uninviting building facilities.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a consistent problem.
  • -Lack of essential course materials and unclear expectations are problematic.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a significant drawback.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support negatively impacts the student experience.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and student support is a major concern.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution garners its highest marks for **Location** (4.2), a key strength. Professors are also well-regarded at 3.8. Conversely, **Internationality** received the lowest score (2.7), indicating an area for potential improvement. Other aspects like Facilities and Accomodation received moderate ratings, while Student Life and Value fall in the middle ground.

This institution garners excellent feedback, particularly excelling in **Location**, **Student Life**, **Internationality**, and **Value**, all receiving a strong 4.6. Professors also earned high marks at 4.6. The **Facilities** are well-regarded at 4.4, while **Accomodation** is the lowest rated, though still a respectable 4.2.

This institution garners praise for its academic offerings and setting, with Professors scoring an impressive 4.75 and Location an equally strong 4.5. Student Life and Facilities are rated well at 4, while Value also stands out at 4.5. Areas for potential improvement include Accomodation and Internationality, both receiving a 3.75.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This institution boasts outstanding scores in core areas: facilities, professors, location, and student life all received perfect marks. Accommodation and value are also strong points, rated highly at 4 out of 5. However, internationality is a significant weakness, scoring only 1 out of 5. Overall, it offers a robust experience, particularly in its campus environment and academic offerings, but faces challenges in attracting and supporting an international student body.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

Reviews indicate positive experiences with education, job prospects, and teaching staff (~67% positive). Some negative feedback (~16.7%) mentions outdated curricula and program management issues. The average rating is 3.67/5.

Students praise the National University of Cuyo for academic excellence, professional preparation, and a supportive, diverse environment, with ~0% negative feedback. The university is recognized for its variety of programs and commitment to research.

With an average rating of 4.2/5 from 5 reviews, student feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Recurring themes highlight supportive lecturers, well-structured courses, and good campus life.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

With a single review, the university receives a 4/5 average rating. The feedback highlights a large campus with good amenities, top-notch education, approachable staff, and ample co-curricular/extra-curricular opportunities for growth.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
33%
80%
20%
0%
0%
0%
0%
4★
25%
20%
80%
0%
0%
100%
0%
3★
25%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
8%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
8%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close