Visayas State University - VSU vs Canakkale 18 March University - COMU vs Neu Ulm University of Applied Sciences vs Plymouth Marjon University vs Our Lady of Lourdes College Foundation

Side-by-side comparison from 27 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Visayas State University - VSU: wins 0/0 categories
Canakkale 18 March University - COMU: wins 0/0 categories
Neu Ulm University of Applied Sciences: wins 0/0 categories
Plymouth Marjon University: wins 0/0 categories
Our Lady of Lourdes College Foundation: wins 0/0 categories
Asian Institute of Medical and Management Sciences: wins 0/0 categories
Bukhara State Medical Institute: wins 0/0 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Agricultural Engineering
Best programme: English Language and Literature
Plymouth, The United Kingdom
4.30
Read more reviews
3 reviews
×
Best programme: Digital Media
Best programme: Anesthesia
Best programme: Bachelor of Medicine
Category ratings
Facilities
3.33
3.86
Not rated
4.33
Not rated
5.00
5.00
Location
4.33
4.57
Not rated
5.00
Not rated
3.00
5.00
Professors
4.00
4.29
Not rated
5.00
Not rated
5.00
4.33
Internationality
4.67
3.50
Not rated
4.33
Not rated
5.00
5.00
Student life
4.33
4.15
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
5.00
5.00
Value
5.00
3.79
Not rated
4.67
Not rated
5.00
4.33
Accommodation
4.00
3.71
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
5.00
5.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +High quality, well-rounded education with practical application.
  • +Supportive academic environment with approachable, invested professors.
  • +Opportunities for future success and personal development.
  • +Excellent campus location and facilities
  • +Supportive and helpful professors
  • +Well-organized and comprehensive courses

Nothing to show

  • +Supportive and approachable staff and lecturers
  • +Strong emphasis on practical learning and career preparation
  • +Personalized attention due to small class sizes and a close-knit community

Nothing to show

  • +Excellent facilities and resources.
  • +Strong demand for anaesthesia graduates.
  • +Opportunities for diverse career paths.
  • +Good medical study programs and experienced lecturers
  • +Modern campus facilities and accommodation
  • +Positive overall study experience
Cons
  • -Administrative & management issues hinder student progress.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources frustrate learning.
  • -Poor communication and support leave students feeling ignored.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause confusion and frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder effective learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and student support is a recurring problem.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause constant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
  • -Lack of communication and transparency from leadership is a recurring problem.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues create significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and inadequate resources hinder learning.
  • -Communication breakdowns and lack of support are common complaints.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are frequently cited.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support is a common complaint.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution receives top marks for its **value**, scoring a perfect 5. Its **location** and **student life** are also highly praised, both earning 4.33. **Accomodation** and **professors** are rated well at 4. The university also demonstrates strong **internationality** with a 4.67 score. The weakest area appears to be **facilities**, receiving a rating of 3.33.

This university garners its highest marks for **Location**, boasting a score of 4.57. **Professors** are also highly regarded, receiving a rating of 4.29. Conversely, **Internationality** is the area with the lowest score, at 3.5. Other aspects like Facilities, Accommodation, and Value fall in the mid-range, indicating a generally positive but not universally outstanding performance.

Nothing to show

With top marks in **Professors** and **Location**, this institution shines. **Facilities** and **Internationality** also received strong scores. **Student Life** and **Accomodation** earned solid, albeit lower, ratings. The primary area for potential improvement seems to be the facilities, which, while good, are not as outstanding as other aspects.

Nothing to show

This institution receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with perfect scores awarded for its facilities, professors, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value. Its strengths lie in these key areas, providing a comprehensive and highly satisfactory experience for students. The only moderate rating is for location, which received a score of 3, indicating it is a less prominent factor compared to the university's other outstanding aspects.

This institution garners outstanding scores in Facilities, Location, Student Life, Accommodation, and Internationality, all receiving a perfect 5. Professors and Value are areas of significant strength, though slightly lower at 4.33. The university clearly excels in providing a well-rounded and attractive experience for its students.

Reviews summary
Highlights

All four reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.25/5. Students highlight quality education, in-demand courses, approachable professors, and opportunities abroad as key strengths.

With an average rating of 4.19/5, approximately 93% of reviews are positive. Students praise the university's well-organized courses, supportive professors, and beautiful, functional campus. Some note that accommodation is expensive.

Nothing to show

Students praise Marjon University for its strong support systems and approachable, supportive lecturers (~100%). They highlight a close-knit community feel with personalized attention and modern facilities. Practical learning and great sports amenities are also appreciated.

Nothing to show

This university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with a 5/5 average rating. Students praise the facilities and career opportunities within the Anaesthesia program. There is no negative feedback currently recorded.

All three reviews are positive (100%), with an average rating of 5/5. Students praise the good study environment and experienced staff, highlighting the institute as a recommended choice for medical studies.

Rating distribution
5★
25%
31%
0%
33%
0%
100%
100%
4★
75%
56%
0%
67%
0%
0%
0%
3★
0%
13%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

MD

I'm studying in Bukhara state medical institute. I'm in 2nd year and studying medicine. It's a fabulous experience in uzbekistan, the study here is good , in recommendated to others to come in here in bukhara for studying medicine 😊

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close