emlyon business school vs Mumbai University vs upGrad vs Ecole Intuit Lab vs Indian Institute of Technology Bombay - IITB

Side-by-side comparison from 120 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
emlyon business school: wins 4/7 categories
Mumbai University: wins 0/7 categories
upGrad: wins 0/7 categories
Ecole Intuit Lab: wins 0/7 categories
Indian Institute of Technology Bombay - IITB: wins 3/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Programme Grande Ecole (PGE)
Mumbai, India
4.00
Read more reviews
65 reviews
×
Best programme: Commerce
London, The United Kingdom
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Marseille, France
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Metallurgical and Materials Engineering
Category ratings
Facilities
4.15
Win
3.55
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Location
4.60
4.10
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Professors
4.06
Win
3.83
Not rated
Not rated
3.50
Internationality
4.60
Win
3.28
Not rated
Not rated
4.50
Student life
4.25
3.85
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Value
4.43
4.06
Not rated
Not rated
4.50
Win
Accommodation
3.94
Win
3.28
Not rated
Not rated
3.50
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Practical and international programs with diverse students
  • +Valuable professional experience through internships and work-study
  • +Supportive environment for personal and professional development
  • +Comprehensive course offerings and accessible education
  • +Engaging practical sessions and knowledgeable faculty
  • +Streamlined application and submission processes

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Expert and approachable faculty
  • +Extensive academic and infrastructure facilities
  • +Holistic ecosystem and personal growth
Cons
  • -Lack of practical value and shallow content in courses.
  • -Unfair and frustrating grading, especially for group projects.
  • -Disappointing professor engagement and program support.
  • -Administrative inefficiency and poor management are significant problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and the reality of the college experience differ from promotions.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Poor communication and unresponsiveness from staff.
  • -Outdated facilities and inadequate resources.
  • -Overcrowded classrooms and limited course availability.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution demonstrates exceptional strength in its internationality and location, both scoring above 4.5. Student life and value also received positive marks, exceeding 4.2 and 4.4 respectively. However, accommodation presents as the weakest area, with the lowest rating of approximately 3.94. Facilities and professors also received solid, though slightly lower, scores in comparison.

This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its **location** and **value for money**, both receiving high marks. **Student life** and **professors** also earned positive scores. Conversely, **facilities**, **accommodation**, and **internationality** present areas for potential improvement, indicated by their lower ratings. Overall, the university offers a compelling proposition, particularly for those prioritizing location and value, with opportunities to enhance the student experience in other aspects.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This institution excels in several key areas, boasting perfect scores for **Location** and **Student Life**. **Internationality** and **Value** also receive very strong marks, at 4.5. The **Facilities** are well-regarded with a 4. **Professors** and **Accommodation** are rated at a solid 3.5, representing the areas with the most room for improvement.

Reviews summary
Highlights

The vast majority of university students have a positive experience, highlighting academic rigor, practical learning, and international environments. A small fraction of reviews mention disappointment with course content and grading.

Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting good learning experiences, helpful staff, and a wide range of courses. A small percentage (4.6%) of negative feedback mentions administrative inefficiency and concerns about course relevance.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Students highly praise the university, with 100% positive feedback and an average rating of 4.5/5. They highlight academic freedom, approachable professors, and extensive infrastructure, including the library and sports facilities.

Rating distribution
5★
60%
35%
0%
0%
50%
4★
28%
38%
0%
0%
50%
3★
9%
22%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
3%
0%
0%
0%
1★
2%
2%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

specialisation in literature

The faculty and university is good. But, if you an't to take admission in french department then take admission only if you have a keen interest in literature and history. Because this department specialises in those domains. But, if you want to explore other practical applications of language such as linguistics and translation. In that case, considering other universities is a better option. Because literature is very heavy and everybody does not has the capacity to handle all of that.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close