Muhamadiyah Malang University - UMM vs The Catholic University of Paris - ICP vs Higher Institute of Medical Technologies of Tunis vs Information Technology School vs Federal University Dutse - F.U.D

Side-by-side comparison from 11 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Muhamadiyah Malang University - UMM: wins 4/5 categories
The Catholic University of Paris - ICP: wins 0/5 categories
Higher Institute of Medical Technologies of Tunis: wins 0/5 categories
Information Technology School: wins 0/5 categories
Federal University Dutse - F.U.D: wins 1/5 categories
National Taiwan Normal University: wins 0/5 categories
TEK-UP University: wins 0/5 categories
Comparing
Best programme: International Relations
Best programme: Law and Political Science
Best programme: Medicine and Surgery
Best programme: Global Studies
Tunisie, Tunisia
5.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Cybersecurity
Category ratings
Facilities
4.00
3.50
Not rated
Not rated
4.25
Win
3.00
4.00
Location
5.00
Win
4.25
Not rated
Not rated
3.67
4.00
3.00
Professors
5.00
Win
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
4.50
4.00
4.00
Internationality
5.00
2.50
Not rated
Not rated
3.50
5.00
4.00
Student life
5.00
Win
3.75
Not rated
Not rated
3.50
3.00
4.00
Value
5.00
Win
3.25
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
4.00
4.00
Accommodation
4.00
3.50
Not rated
Not rated
3.50
4.00
4.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Rigorous thesis and journal preparation is highly valued.
  • +Effective supervisor guidance during the RTHI class is appreciated.
  • +Some system complexities exist, causing repeated revisions.
  • +Well-ranked programs with career opportunities
  • +Supportive learning environment and small class sizes
  • +Excellent campus location and facilities

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Experienced and dedicated lecturers.
  • +Conducive learning environment and well-furnished facilities.
  • +Ample equipment and resources for projects.
  • +Diverse and international student body
  • +Opportunities for engagement and idea exchange
  • +Experienced and professional faculty
  • +Career-focused education with practical experience
  • +Free valuable international certifications
  • +Enriching academic and professional development
Cons
  • -Inadequate administrative support and unclear management.
  • -Outdated facilities and limited resources for learning.
  • -Lack of practical application and career preparation.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are a major drawback.
  • -A perceived lack of support and insufficient resources for academic success is a recurring complaint.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative & management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and unclear expectations frustrate students.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources negatively impact the learning environment.
  • -Inconsistent or poor teaching quality is a recurring concern.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are a major concern.
  • -Limited career support and unclear future prospects are disappointing.
Rating summary
What students say

Across numerous aspects, this institution demonstrates outstanding strengths. Professors, location, student life, internationality, and value all achieved perfect scores, indicating exceptional experiences in these areas. Facilities and accommodation, while still strong, represent the comparatively weaker aspects with a rating of four.

This university demonstrates notable strengths in its location, receiving a 4.25 rating. Student life also scores well at 3.75, along with professors at 4. However, internationality presents a significant area for improvement, with a rating of 2.5. Facilities and accommodation are rated at a moderate 3.5, while value sits at 3.25.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This institution receives excellent marks for its professors, earning a strong 4.5. Facilities are also highly regarded at 4.25. Areas that could see improvement include student life, accommodation, and internationality, all scoring 3.5. Location presents a moderate rating of 3.67, while the overall value is rated favorably at 4.

This institution demonstrates a very strong international outlook, earning a perfect score in that category. Professors, location, and accommodation also received favorable ratings, indicating solid performance in these aspects. However, facilities and student life are identified as areas with the most room for improvement, receiving slightly lower marks. Overall, the university presents a well-rounded offering with distinct strengths.

Demonstrating a strong overall performance, this institution receives high marks in numerous areas. Notably, facilities, professors, student life, accommodation, and internationality are all rated an excellent 4. The university also scores well for value, indicating a positive return on investment. Its weakest area, though still respectable, is location, with a rating of 3.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With one review, the average rating is 5/5, indicating overwhelmingly positive sentiment. The single positive comment found the RTHI class helpful for thesis and journal preparation but noted system intricacies regarding supervisor revisions.

With an average rating of 4.25/5, ~75% of student feedback is positive. Recurring themes praise the good programs, well-equipped, large campus in Paris, and a conducive teaching environment. There is no negative feedback.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

All four reviews are highly positive, averaging 4.5 out of 5 stars. Students praise the university's resources, experienced lecturers, and conducive learning environment. No negative feedback was provided.

The university has a 5/5 average rating, with 100% positive feedback. Students praise its diversity and international student community, noting opportunities for idea exchange and engagement.

With one review, the university receives a perfect 5/5 rating. This overwhelmingly positive feedback highlights an enriching academic and professional experience, strong career-oriented education, and valuable access to free international tech certifications.

Rating distribution
5★
100%
50%
0%
0%
50%
100%
100%
4★
0%
25%
0%
0%
50%
0%
0%
3★
0%
25%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close