University of New South Wales vs Libera Università Maria SS. Assunta - LUMSA vs Horizons University vs Kebbi State University of Science and Technology - KSUSTA vs Open Polytechnic
Side-by-side comparison from 46 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Industry-connected academics and practical learning
- +High-quality teaching and well-structured courses
- +Modern, well-equipped campus facilities
- +Approachable, supportive professors and a positive learning environment.
- +Opportunities for international experiences and active student involvement.
- +Well-structured courses and encouragement for personal and professional growth.
Nothing to show
- +Supportive lecturers and academic environment
- +Opportunities for personal growth and success
- +Positive campus community and student integration
- +Extensive course selection and accessible, responsive tutors
- +Flexible study options balancing work and family
- +Supportive and inspirational faculty making learning enjoyable
Nothing to show
- +Engaging lectures and supportive faculty
- +Desire for more practical application alongside theory
- -Unclear communication and administrative inefficiencies hinder student experience.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources detract from learning.
- -Limited access to faculty support and unclear academic progression create frustration.
- -Disorganized administration and unclear communication.
- -Lack of modern facilities and outdated resources.
- -Inconsistent or ineffective teaching and support.
Nothing to show
- -Inconsistent or poor administrative and management support is a major concern.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of clear communication and transparency from the institution causes frustration.
- -Poor teaching quality and irrelevant course material.
- -Disconnect between learning content and assignments/practical skills taught.
Nothing to show
- -Unresponsive and unhelpful administration and management create significant frustration.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities significantly detract from the learning environment.
- -Overcrowded classes and a lack of individualized attention hinder academic progress.
Overall, this university receives solid ratings, particularly excelling in **Professors** with an impressive 4.61. The **Facilities** also score very well at 4.45. Areas for potential improvement include **Accomodation**, which received the lowest score at 3.91, and **Value** at 4.09, suggesting these might be areas where students experienced less satisfaction compared to other aspects of their university experience.
This institution receives excellent marks for its Location and Value, both scoring above 4.6. Professors and Facilities are also highly regarded, with ratings of 4.46. Areas needing improvement include Student Life and Accommodation, which stand at 3.77 and 3.75 respectively. Internationality is rated moderately well at 4.15.
Nothing to show
Student feedback reveals a university with considerable strengths, particularly in **Student Life**, which scored an impressive 4.5. **Professors** also received a solid rating of 4. Areas such as **Facilities** and **Location** garnered a respectable 3.5. The most modest scores were for **Accomodation** (3) and **Internationality** (3). **Value** for money was rated positively at 4.
Regarding university assessments, the value proposition stands out as the strongest area, receiving the highest rating. Conversely, facilities, student life, and accommodation were identified as weaker aspects, all scoring similarly low. Professors and internationality received moderate scores. The university's location also garnered a respectable rating.
Nothing to show
This institution excels in **Value** and **Facilities**, receiving high marks in these key areas. Conversely, **Location**, **Accomodation**, and **Internationality** represent its comparatively weaker aspects, scoring a respectable but lower three out of five. **Professors** and **Student Life** fall within the middle range of performance.
With ~100% positive sentiment from 23 reviews, students praise the excellent education, industry connections, and modern facilities. Some noted a lack of cultural diversity among the student body.
With an average rating of 4.54/5, ~92% of reviews are positive. Students praise approachable professors, modern facilities, and a supportive, dynamic learning environment with many student initiatives and international opportunities. No negative feedback was reported.
Nothing to show
With a 3.5/5 average rating, ~50% of reviews are positive. Positive feedback highlights helpful lecturers and a conducive study environment. No negative feedback was recorded.
~83% of reviews are positive, praising course variety, helpful tutors, and flexible online learning. A small portion (~17%) of feedback is negative, citing unhelpful course materials and tutors.
Nothing to show
With a 3.5/5 average, reviews are mostly positive (~50%). One review highlighted great lectures and engaging teaching. There were no negative reviews.
The UNSW is a great university, as an International student I would like to express the experience I had when Studying there. There are many international students who studied there, various students around the world are getting their degrees at UNSW. I like the experience as a students we met some experience people that is dealing with real life experience working in certain industry, they shared us some real life situation and how to handle those. I'd recommend students to study there as UNSW is one of the top university across Australia.
I think it is one of the best Italian universities in terms of work, availability, professionalism and hospitality are at the highest levels, and it offers various study paths structured in an optimal way. I recommend it to anyone who wants to take a university course.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I did my BBus through Open Polytech (2007-2013) and was really happy, recommended them. However, in the last couple of years I had to do the Level 5 Certificate in Financial Services (Residential Property) and am now doing the Level 4 Certificate in Accounting, and wow has the standard gone downhill. There were so many errors in the Level 5 Certificate, they had not updated it with very important changes in the laws (of which I rolled out changes in my organisation, so I knew more than the tutor did!). Now I am doing a Level 4 Certificate and the standard of the information is poor, forms that don't work and vaguely worded questions that the 'tutor' refused to clarify. At least I didn't pay for it but the taxpayers (of which I am one) are still paying for it! Such a shame to see my alma mater go backwards like that.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
