Swiss School of Management - SSM vs German University in Cairo - GUC vs Egyptian Russian University vs Helwan university - HU vs Higher Institute Of Tourism And Hotels

Side-by-side comparison from 28 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Swiss School of Management - SSM (5.00)
Swiss School of Management - SSM: wins 5/7 categories
German University in Cairo - GUC: wins 1/7 categories
Egyptian Russian University: wins 1/7 categories
Helwan university - HU: wins 0/7 categories
Higher Institute Of Tourism And Hotels: wins 0/7 categories
Egyptian Chinese University - ECU: wins 0/7 categories
Canadian International College - CIC: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Bellinzona, Switzerland
5.00
Top
Read more reviews
3 reviews
×
Best programme: Bachelor of Business Administration
Best programme: Computer Engineering
Best programme: Electronics and Telecommunication
Best programme: MBA specialisation Nursing
Category ratings
Facilities
4.67
Win
4.60
3.00
3.69
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Location
5.00
Win
4.11
2.00
3.33
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
4.33
4.55
5.00
Win
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
5.00
Win
3.45
3.00
3.46
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
4.33
4.40
Win
3.00
3.69
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Value
5.00
Win
4.36
3.00
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
5.00
Win
3.36
1.00
3.23
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Practical, real-world preparation
  • +Personal and professional growth
  • +International experience
  • +High-quality education with practical application
  • +Strong job market preparation and skill development
  • +Supportive and like-minded community
  • +Strong international focus and challenging courses
  • +Dedicated faculty and close-knit community
  • +Unique educational experience
  • +High quality of teaching staff and accommodating faculty.
  • +Abundant academic resources and diverse, multidisciplinary programs.
  • +Excellent organization and supervision of university operations.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Frustrating administrative and management issues.
  • -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
  • -Lack of engaging and relevant curriculum.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration and inefficiency.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning and comfort.
  • -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant or poorly implemented.
  • -Students dislike administrative and management issues.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a common complaint.
  • -Lack of resources and limited course availability frustrate students.
  • -Coursework policies and grading inconsistencies discourage genuine learning.
  • -Ineffective teaching methods and outdated assessment formats are prevalent.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution boasts exceptional scores in several key areas, notably achieving perfect marks for **Location**, **Accomodation**, **Internationality**, and **Value**. The **Facilities** also stand out with a strong rating of 4.67. Areas showing slightly less consistent strength, though still positive, include **Professors** and **Student Life**, both rated at 4.33.

This university receives notably strong evaluations for its **Facilities** (4.6), **Professors** (4.55), and **Student Life** (4.4). Areas where scores are comparatively lower include **Accomodation** (3.36) and **Internationality** (3.45). Other aspects like Location (4.11) and Value (4.36) also received positive, albeit moderate, ratings.

This institution demonstrates significant strengths in faculty quality, receiving a perfect score. However, it faces considerable challenges regarding accommodation, which received the lowest possible rating. Facilities, student life, internationality, and overall value are rated moderately. The location is also identified as a weaker area, with a score of two.

This institution performs exceptionally well in academic and financial aspects, with a perfect 4.0 rating for Professors and Value. Student Life and Facilities also received solid scores, both at 3.69. The weakest areas identified were Accomodation (3.23) and Location (3.33), though Internationality remains moderate at 3.46.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

All three reviews are overwhelmingly positive, awarding a perfect 5/5 rating. Students highlight the university's encouragement of creativity and practical, real-world business preparation. The international experience and the balance between theory and practice are also frequently praised.

All 11 reviews are positive, averaging 4.64/5 stars. Students praise high-quality education, strong preparation for the job market, and a vibrant, creative community.

The sole review for Egyptian Russian University is positive, with an average rating of 4/5 stars. Positive feedback highlights the international focus and challenging courses, though minor administrative issues were noted.

With a 3.92 average rating, ~74% of reviews are positive, praising diverse faculties, quality teaching staff, and available resources. A small percentage (~7.7%) of negative feedback indicates disappointment with specific programs and grading practices.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
100%
64%
0%
31%
0%
0%
0%
4★
0%
36%
100%
38%
0%
0%
0%
3★
0%
0%
0%
23%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
8%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close