Lebanese American University - LAU vs Centro Escolar University - CEU vs Tribhuvan University vs Pokhara University vs Thames College

Side-by-side comparison from 30 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Lebanese American University - LAU: wins 0/5 categories
Centro Escolar University - CEU: wins 1/5 categories
Tribhuvan University: wins 0/5 categories
Pokhara University: wins 0/5 categories
Thames College: wins 4/5 categories
Ace Institute of Management: wins 0/5 categories
Liaoning University of Traditional Chinese Medicine: wins 0/5 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Biology
Best programme: BSC Medical Laboratory Technology
Kathmandu, Nepal
3.70
Read more reviews
6 reviews
×
Best programme: Bachelor of Business
Kathmandu, Nepal
4.40
Read more reviews
5 reviews
×
Best programme: Business Administration
Kathmandu, Nepal
5.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: BBA International Business
Best programme: Bachelor of Business Administration
Category ratings
Facilities
4.30
4.20
3.67
3.80
5.00
Win
4.00
Not rated
Location
4.33
4.60
4.33
4.40
5.00
5.00
Not rated
Professors
4.17
4.20
4.00
4.80
5.00
Win
4.00
Not rated
Internationality
3.50
4.20
3.33
4.20
5.00
Win
4.00
Not rated
Student life
4.58
4.40
3.83
4.40
5.00
Win
4.00
Not rated
Value
3.83
4.60
4.17
4.00
5.00
5.00
Not rated
Accommodation
3.92
4.60
Win
2.67
3.80
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Supportive and accessible faculty
  • +Diverse student community and collaborative environment
  • +Strong academic foundation and practical learning opportunities
  • +Welcoming atmosphere and approachable faculty
  • +Opportunities for skill development and extracurriculars
  • +Well-equipped facilities for science and practical learning
  • +Quality education with knowledgeable and supportive faculty
  • +Friendly and respectful learning environment
  • +Opportunities for practical and theoretical knowledge acquisition
  • +Diverse program selection and flexible curriculum
  • +Supportive professors and practical learning experiences
  • +Relevant course updates based on market demand
  • +Well-rounded, real-world preparation
  • +Strong academic programs
  • +Practical learning and personal development focus
  • +Supportive and motivating atmosphere
  • +Valuable industry exposure and internships

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent complaint.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are consistently mentioned.
  • -Lack of resources and support are significant concerns.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning experiences.
  • -Overcrowding and large class sizes reduce individual attention.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a major source of frustration.
  • -Delays in result announcements negatively impact academic planning.
  • -Disorganized examination schedules create unnecessary stress.
  • -Disorganized and unhelpful administration causes significant frustration.
  • -Inadequate and outdated facilities and resources impede learning.
  • -Lack of academic support and unresponsive instructors create barriers to success.
  • -Administrative & management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are consistently criticized.
  • -Student support services are perceived as inadequate and unresponsive.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a major concern.
  • -Teaching quality and curriculum relevance are frequently criticized.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution demonstrates notable strengths in student life, receiving a high rating of 4.58. Location and facilities also scored well, both above 4.3. Conversely, internationality and accommodation appear to be areas for potential improvement, with scores of 3.5 and 3.92 respectively. The university's value for money and professor quality are rated moderately.

This institution garners exceptional ratings across several key areas, particularly excelling in **Location** and **Accomodation**, both achieving a perfect 4.6. **Student Life** is also highly regarded at 4.4. The university demonstrates strong performance in **Facilities**, **Professors**, and **Internationality**, each scoring 4.2. While all metrics are positive, the ratings for **Facilities**, **Professors**, and **Internationality** represent the comparatively lower, though still good, scores within this otherwise excellent profile.

This institution demonstrates a strong appeal in its **location**, receiving a high rating of 4.33. **Value** and **professors** also scored well, at 4.17 and 4 respectively. Conversely, **accommodation** stands out as the weakest area, with a significantly lower rating of 2.67. **Facilities**, **student life**, and **internationality** fall into the mid-range of ratings, indicating areas for potential improvement.

An analysis of university ratings reveals strengths in academic and social aspects. Professors receive an outstanding 4.8, and student life and location are also highly rated at 4.4. While the university offers good value at 4.0 and demonstrates strong internationality (4.2), facilities and accommodation are areas for improvement, both scoring 3.8.

This institution achieves outstanding scores in several key areas, notably in its facilities, professors, location, student life, and internationality, all receiving a perfect five. Accommodations present a slight dip with a score of four, indicating this is the relatively weakest aspect. Overall, the university demonstrates exceptional strength and value, as reflected in the consistent high ratings across most metrics.

This university demonstrates impressive strengths in its location and value, both receiving perfect scores. Facilities, professors, student life, and internationality are also highly regarded, all earning a solid 4 out of 5. However, accommodation is a significant weakness, scoring a zero. This indicates a need for substantial improvement in student housing options.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

Approximately 83% of reviews are positive, highlighting engaging courses, supportive faculty, and academic excellence. Some mention slow bureaucracy and chaotic registration as minor issues.

All 5 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.8/5. Recurring themes include a welcoming atmosphere, approachable and effective professors, and well-equipped facilities.

Approximately 67% of reviews are positive, highlighting quality education, supportive faculty, and a friendly environment. Some negative feedback (~33%) points to issues with exam organization and delayed result announcements.

Reviews for Pokhara University are overwhelmingly positive (100%), with an average rating of 4.4/5. Students highlight diverse programs, expanding course options, and positive learning experiences. Some note issues with exam scheduling and result accuracy.

With a 5/5 average rating and 100% positive feedback, reviews highlight a well-rounded education preparing students for real-world challenges. No negative comments were recorded.

The sole review is highly positive, rating 5/5. This feedback highlights strong academics and personal development, with a balanced atmosphere and practical learning opportunities. Negative feedback is negligible.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
33%
80%
33%
40%
100%
100%
0%
4★
50%
20%
33%
60%
0%
0%
0%
3★
17%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
33%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close