Université de Pau et des Pays de l'Adour - UPPA vs Bahcesehir University - BAU vs BI Norwegian Business School - BI vs NHH Norwegian School of Economics vs Courses for Success
Side-by-side comparison from 30 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Excellent reputation, internationality, and staff availability.
- +Wide variety of majors offered.
- +Good choice for students preferring a smaller, quieter city environment.
- +Diverse international atmosphere and supportive faculty
- +Vibrant curriculum and academic quality
- +Inspiring city location and global opportunities
- +Knowledgeable lecturers and strong academic environment
- +Practical approach and industry connections
- +Good location and food variety
- +Free tuition and diverse program options
- +High quality education and international exchange opportunities
- +Supportive environment and welcoming community
Nothing to show
- +Quality education with knowledgeable and supportive faculty
- +Friendly and respectful learning environment
- +Opportunities for practical and theoretical knowledge acquisition
- +Practical, real-world applications and project-based learning
- +Balanced theory and lab work focus
- +Strong curriculum in core engineering areas
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are frequently mentioned.
- -Communication breakdowns and lack of support from staff cause frustration.
- -Poor communication and lack of transparency from administration.
- -Inadequate and outdated facilities and resources.
- -Ineffective and unengaging teaching methods.
- -Students dislike the lack of proper support and communication from staff.
- -They often complain about outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources.
- -Students express frustration with the curriculum and teaching methods being unengaging or irrelevant.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a recurring concern.
- -Poor teaching quality and curriculum relevance are often criticized.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues are a major source of frustration.
- -Delays in result announcements negatively impact academic planning.
- -Disorganized examination schedules create unnecessary stress.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of student support and engagement from staff is a consistent complaint.
Overall, this university received a rating of zero in all surveyed categories, indicating no discernible strengths or weaknesses in facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, or value. The consistent lack of positive or negative feedback across all aspects suggests a neutral, undeveloped, or universally unmet standard across the board.
Overall, the university garners strong ratings, with its location standing out as the highest-scoring area. Professors and student life also received commendable scores, reflecting positively on academic instruction and campus engagement. Facilities, accommodation, and value for money are rated solidly, indicating a good overall student experience. Internationality is also well-received, contributing to a diverse and welcoming environment.
This institution demonstrates remarkable strengths, with exceptional ratings for its Facilities, Professors, and Location, all scoring an impressive 4.5. Student Life and Internationality also receive solid marks at 4. However, Accommodations and Value emerge as areas needing development, each receiving a lower score of 3.
This institution receives exceptionally high marks for its facilities and accommodation, both scoring an outstanding 4.7. Professors and internationality are also strong points, with ratings of 4.4. Student life and value for money are rated at 4.3 and 4.1 respectively. The university's location is its weakest area, though still a respectable 4.1.
Nothing to show
This institution demonstrates a strong appeal in its **location**, receiving a high rating of 4.33. **Value** and **professors** also scored well, at 4.17 and 4 respectively. Conversely, **accommodation** stands out as the weakest area, with a significantly lower rating of 2.67. **Facilities**, **student life**, and **internationality** fall into the mid-range of ratings, indicating areas for potential improvement.
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in student life and accommodation, both receiving perfect scores. Facilities and internationality are also highly regarded. While the location garners a strong rating, the professorial quality is the weakest area, scoring a 3. Overall, the university offers a commendable experience with particularly excellent offerings in its social and living environments.
With a 4/5 average rating and 100% positive feedback, UPPA is praised for its strong reputation, international appeal, and program variety. Staff professionalism is also highlighted.
With an average rating of 4.54/5, ~92% of reviews are positive. Students praise the strong international atmosphere, supportive professors, and vibrant campus life. Some note curriculum repetition and tuition expense.
With an average rating of 4/5, student feedback is highly positive. Reviewers consistently praise the great location, knowledgeable lecturers, and strong academic environment. Industry connections and a practical approach to education were also highlighted.
Reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~0% negative feedback. Students praise the free tuition and wide range of masters specializations, highlighting a conducive academic and diverse environment.
Nothing to show
Approximately 67% of reviews are positive, highlighting quality education, supportive faculty, and a friendly environment. Some negative feedback (~33%) points to issues with exam organization and delayed result announcements.
With a single review, the average rating is 4/5. This feedback highlights a solid and practical MSc in Electrical Engineering, emphasizing real-world applications, balanced theory and lab work, and project-based learning.
Nothing to show
My overall experience at Bahçeşehir University (BAU) has been very positive. The university provides a modern learning environment with strong academic support and many opportunities to grow professionally. I studied Computer Engineering, and I appreciated how the programme focused on both theory and practical skills. Many courses were taught by experienced instructors who were approachable, supportive, and knowledgeable. What I liked most about BAU was the access to hands-on projects, industry connections, and opportunities to participate in real-world work through collaborations, competitions, and internships. The atmosphere is diverse, and you meet students from many different countries, which helps you build communication and teamwork skills. On the downside, the workload can be heavy during some semesters, and administrative processes can occasionally be slow. However, the overall quality of education and the support you receive make up for it. I would recommend BAU to students who want a modern, internationally-oriented university that helps them become job-ready with practical experience and strong academic foundations.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
