IPAG Business School vs University of the Philippines Manila - UPM vs Tribhuvan University vs Pokhara University vs Thames College
Side-by-side comparison from 25 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Experienced and supportive faculty, focused on student well-being and professional development.
- +Program relevance to career goals, practical experience, and adaptability to student feedback.
- +Welcoming and inclusive environment, fostering a sense of community and individual value.
- +Health and science focus
- +Practical communication skills
- +Quality education with knowledgeable and supportive faculty
- +Friendly and respectful learning environment
- +Opportunities for practical and theoretical knowledge acquisition
- +Diverse program selection and flexible curriculum
- +Supportive professors and practical learning experiences
- +Relevant course updates based on market demand
- +Well-rounded, real-world preparation
- +Strong academic programs
Nothing to show
- +Practical learning and personal development focus
- +Supportive and motivating atmosphere
- +Valuable industry exposure and internships
- -Unprofessional coordination and administrative issues.
- -Low academic quality and unfulfilled course offerings.
- -Poor student support and delayed essential documentation.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder learning.
- -Communication and feedback from instructors are often lacking or poor.
- -Administrative and management issues are a major source of frustration.
- -Delays in result announcements negatively impact academic planning.
- -Disorganized examination schedules create unnecessary stress.
- -Disorganized and unhelpful administration causes significant frustration.
- -Inadequate and outdated facilities and resources impede learning.
- -Lack of academic support and unresponsive instructors create barriers to success.
- -Administrative & management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are consistently criticized.
- -Student support services are perceived as inadequate and unresponsive.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a major concern.
- -Teaching quality and curriculum relevance are frequently criticized.
An analysis of the university's ratings reveals a distinct pattern, with **Location** standing out as the strongest area, scoring a near-perfect 4.7. Areas such as **Student Life** and **Internationality** also received strong marks, both at 3.87. Conversely, **Accomodation** represents the weakest aspect, with a rating of 3.25, closely followed by **Facilities** at 3.44. Professors and Value are rated moderately well.
Across the board, this institution garners perfect scores, indicating excellence in every surveyed area. Particularly outstanding are its facilities and professors, both receiving top marks. While no weak areas are identified, the consistent five-star ratings suggest a remarkably well-rounded and highly desirable university experience across all aspects of student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value.
This institution demonstrates a strong appeal in its **location**, receiving a high rating of 4.33. **Value** and **professors** also scored well, at 4.17 and 4 respectively. Conversely, **accommodation** stands out as the weakest area, with a significantly lower rating of 2.67. **Facilities**, **student life**, and **internationality** fall into the mid-range of ratings, indicating areas for potential improvement.
An analysis of university ratings reveals strengths in academic and social aspects. Professors receive an outstanding 4.8, and student life and location are also highly rated at 4.4. While the university offers good value at 4.0 and demonstrates strong internationality (4.2), facilities and accommodation are areas for improvement, both scoring 3.8.
This institution achieves outstanding scores in several key areas, notably in its facilities, professors, location, student life, and internationality, all receiving a perfect five. Accommodations present a slight dip with a score of four, indicating this is the relatively weakest aspect. Overall, the university demonstrates exceptional strength and value, as reflected in the consistent high ratings across most metrics.
Nothing to show
This university demonstrates impressive strengths in its location and value, both receiving perfect scores. Facilities, professors, student life, and internationality are also highly regarded, all earning a solid 4 out of 5. However, accommodation is a significant weakness, scoring a zero. This indicates a need for substantial improvement in student housing options.
~82% of reviews are positive, highlighting good programs, attentive staff, and a welcoming environment. A small portion (~18%) mentions issues with course delivery, coordination, and administrative support.
The single review for the university is highly positive, giving a 5/5 rating. This suggests ~100% satisfaction, with commendations for its focus on health and sciences, and valuable learning in behavioral science.
Approximately 67% of reviews are positive, highlighting quality education, supportive faculty, and a friendly environment. Some negative feedback (~33%) points to issues with exam organization and delayed result announcements.
Reviews for Pokhara University are overwhelmingly positive (100%), with an average rating of 4.4/5. Students highlight diverse programs, expanding course options, and positive learning experiences. Some note issues with exam scheduling and result accuracy.
With a 5/5 average rating and 100% positive feedback, reviews highlight a well-rounded education preparing students for real-world challenges. No negative comments were recorded.
Nothing to show
The sole review is highly positive, rating 5/5. This feedback highlights strong academics and personal development, with a balanced atmosphere and practical learning opportunities. Negative feedback is negligible.
The people that are supposed to help you at IPAG are not going to do it, and if they do it would take as long as they want it to take, for example, I tried to renew my visa with the university because they told me like that was easier and it took 8 months in the process, my visa got expired, I almost got kicked out of the country and I ended up doing the process myself. Besides this, I just graduated this year on august and as well as all my classmates we have been trying to get our certificates and our grades in order to start to work or to continue our postgraduate studies but they just don't want to give us all this. IPAG is not a university with organization and neither who cares about their students, just about your money. If you are foreign you will get to know people from all the world and you will have a good experience but you can do this also at any other university in europe and you would be way more taken in count.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
