Universidad Nacional del Litoral - UNL vs Universidad Tecnológica Nacional - UTN vs Mining University of Leoben - MU vs Óbuda University - OE vs United University
Side-by-side comparison from 26 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Academic excellence and quality education
- +Strong emphasis on research and innovation
- +Good facilities and university reputation
- +Strong engineering programs with good job prospects
- +Dedicated and experienced teaching staff
- +Flexible learning options and improving infrastructure
- +Dedicated staff and professors who actively support student learning.
- +Welcoming and helpful community among students and staff.
- +Impressive, modern university facilities and a professional working environment.
- +Practical and industry-relevant education
- +Supportive and helpful professors
- +Diverse international student body
- +Strong academic programs and quality instruction
- +Supportive and engaging learning environment
- +Opportunities for personal and professional growth
Nothing to show
- +Accessible learning resources and opportunities
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Facilities are often outdated and poorly maintained.
- -Course content and teaching methods are perceived as unengaging or irrelevant.
- -Administrative and management issues, including poor communication and unhelpful staff.
- -Outdated curriculum and excessively long program duration.
- -Unattractive and uninviting building facilities.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources create significant obstacles.
- -Inconsistent and unclear communication from instructors and the institution is a major concern.
- -Administrative and management issues caused significant problems.
- -Outdated facilities and poor condition of buildings were a major concern.
- -Lack of organized support for international students was evident.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources are frequently mentioned.
- -Students express dissatisfaction with administrative and management issues.
- -Concerns are raised about the relevance and quality of teaching and curriculum.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
- -Course content is often irrelevant and poorly structured.
Exhibiting a robust overall performance, this institution particularly shines in its **internationality** and **value**, both receiving a high rating of 4.75. **Professors** also earned a commendable 4.5. The university's **facilities** represent its weakest area, scoring a 4. While other aspects like location, student life, and accommodation are rated favorably, these remain slightly below the top-tier scores.
This institution garners its highest marks for **Location** (4.2), a key strength. Professors are also well-regarded at 3.8. Conversely, **Internationality** received the lowest score (2.7), indicating an area for potential improvement. Other aspects like Facilities and Accomodation received moderate ratings, while Student Life and Value fall in the middle ground.
An analysis of the provided ratings reveals a consistent performance across all surveyed areas. The university received a rating of 0 in Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, Accomodation, Internationality, and Value. Consequently, there are no standout strengths or weaknesses, as all aspects are rated identically.
Offering a mixed but generally positive assessment, this institution excels in **Accomodation**, receiving a high score of 4.2. Other strengths include **Professors**, **Location**, and **Internationality**, all rated at 3.8. The university's **Facilities** and **Student Life** are its weakest points, both scoring 3.2, while **Value** sits at a moderate 3.4.
Overall, this institution garners strong approval, particularly excelling in its **Professors** and **Student Life**, both receiving perfect scores. **Accomodation** also achieves a top rating. Its **Facilities**, **Internationality**, and **Value** are well-regarded, all scoring a solid 4. The **Location** is the sole area with a slightly lower score of 3, indicating it's the weakest point in this assessment.
Nothing to show
Receiving perfect scores in every category, this university demonstrates exceptional strength across the board. From state-of-the-art facilities and highly-rated professors to vibrant student life and excellent value, all aspects of the student experience are rated at the highest level. There are no apparent weak areas, indicating a consistently outstanding offering in all surveyed domains.
With an average rating of 4.25/5 from 4 reviews, ~75% of feedback is positive. Students praise its academic quality, strong reputation, and emphasis on research and innovation. No negative reviews were provided.
Reviews indicate positive experiences with education, job prospects, and teaching staff (~67% positive). Some negative feedback (~16.7%) mentions outdated curricula and program management issues. The average rating is 3.67/5.
All 3 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 5/5. Recurring themes include dedicated staff and impressive facilities, with students highlighting helpful professors and a professional working environment.
With 3 out of 5 reviews being positive, students generally find the university offers practical training and helpful professors. Around 20% of feedback noted issues with course availability or administrative support.
With a 5/5 average rating and 100% positive feedback, the single review highlights exceptional academic experiences and an esteemed reputation. No negative feedback was recorded.
Nothing to show
With a 5/5 average rating from one review, this university is highly praised. Positive feedback highlights satisfaction with the opportunities provided. There is no negative feedback.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I was an Erasmus Student at this University(Banky faculty) in spring semester 19/20. It was the worst Erasmus ever. Only 4/9 subjects which I choose in my Learning Agreement existed in the Neptun system( which is compulsory for every student). So I had only 8/30 ECTS in the first week. Firstly, the coordinators answered my e-mails, but it wasn’t so useful, because they only said: “everything is good don’t mind we will fix it”. (If you try to choose another subject from the “subjects list for Erasmus student” (which is on official page) be ready, that 85% of subjects don’t exist in Neptun or don’t have any places for you. ) After 10000 e-mails with asking for help, they stopped responding to me. It was already the end of the second week of studying when I realize that nothing will change and I couldn’t reach the necessary 30ECTS. I had to return to my home Uni not to miss this semester. I don’t know who is responsible for this situation and I don’t wish anyone to be in my place. So... if you want to spoil your Erasmus, waste money, time and Nerves then go to Obuda University.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
