University of Ghana - UG vs Universidad de Sonora - USON vs Kano University of Science and Technology - KUST vs Dr. Hilla Limann Technical University - WTU vs SD Dombo University of Business and Integrated Development Studies - UBIDS

Side-by-side comparison from 260 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Simon Diedong Dombo University of Business and Integrated Development Studies - SDD-UBIDS (5.00)
University of Ghana - UG: wins 0/7 categories
Universidad de Sonora - USON: wins 5/7 categories
Kano University of Science and Technology - KUST: wins 1/7 categories
Dr. Hilla Limann Technical University - WTU: wins 0/7 categories
SD Dombo University of Business and Integrated Development Studies - UBIDS: wins 0/7 categories
Simon Diedong Dombo University of Business and Integrated Development Studies - SDD-UBIDS: wins 1/7 categories
Dr Hilla Limann Technical University - DHLTU: wins 0/7 categories
Category ratings
Facilities
4.00
4.67
Win
3.20
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
Location
4.32
5.00
Win
3.40
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
Professors
4.25
4.33
Win
3.60
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Internationality
4.08
5.00
Win
3.40
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
Student life
4.29
5.00
Win
4.40
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Value
4.22
4.67
3.80
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Accommodation
3.48
2.50
4.50
Win
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Strong academic programs and theory-practice balance
  • +Diverse, inclusive, and intellectually engaging campus environment
  • +Opportunities for exploration and personal growth
  • +High-quality programs and excellent professors
  • +Strong academic resources and practical learning opportunities
  • +Supportive environment and diverse student opportunities
  • +Experienced faculty and personalized academic support
  • +Well-equipped facilities and diverse STEM programs
  • +Vibrant and friendly student community

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Accommodation availability and proximity
  • +Quality of programs offered

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Outdated curriculum and teaching methods hinder skill development.
  • -Inefficient administrative processes cause communication and access issues.
  • -Overcrowded facilities and old-fashioned learning environments are problematic.
  • -Poor communication and organization from administration.
  • -Outdated technology and facilities.
  • -Lack of support and resources for students.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment are a frequent complaint.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Lack of career services support hinders student success.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance.
  • -Administrative and management issues.
  • -Unclear communication and lack of student support.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Overall, the university receives positive feedback, with particularly strong ratings in Location (4.32), Student Life (4.29), and Value (4.22). Professors (4.25) and Internationality (4.08) also score well. The weakest area identified is Accomodation, receiving a rating of 3.48, indicating room for improvement in this aspect of the student experience. Facilities also received a solid, but lower, score of 4.

This institution excels in several key areas, boasting perfect scores for Location, Student Life, and Internationality. Facilities and Value are also highly rated, as is the quality of Professors. However, Accomodation presents a significant weakness, with a considerably lower rating compared to other aspects.

This institution excels in student life and accommodation, both receiving top scores. Conversely, facilities represent the weakest area, with a rating of 3.2. Other aspects like professors, location, internationality, and value fall within a moderate to good range, suggesting a generally positive but not outstanding experience in these domains.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This institution shines particularly bright in **Value**, receiving a perfect score. Student Life and Professors also stand out with strong ratings. Areas that could see improvement include Facilities, Location, and Accommodation, all of which are rated at an average level. Internationality also falls into this mid-range category.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

Most reviews (~88%) highlight academic excellence, diverse programs, and vibrant campus life. A small minority (~1.6%) experienced administrative delays and outdated teaching methods.

All 7 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.71/5. Students praise excellent infrastructure, research materials, and engaged professors. They also value academic freedom and high-quality programs.

With a 4.8/5 average rating, ~100% of reviews are positive. Students highlight empowering education, talented individuals, refined strengths, accessible resources, and excellent STEM programs.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

With a perfect 5/5 average rating and 100% positive feedback, this university is highly recommended. One reviewer praised the academic offerings, noting accommodation distance as a minor, normal challenge.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
41%
71%
80%
0%
0%
100%
0%
4★
47%
29%
20%
0%
0%
0%
0%
3★
11%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Educative

The University of Ghana is a highly respected institution with strong research, diverse programs, and a vibrant campus life, though it faces challenges with large class sizes and administrative delays, and I would recommend it for its academic reputation and opportunities.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close