emlyon business school vs Manipal Academy of Higher Education - MAHE - MU vs International School of Management vs London School of Commerce - LSC vs OP Jindal Global University - JGU
Side-by-side comparison from 219 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Practical and international programs with diverse students
- +Valuable professional experience through internships and work-study
- +Supportive environment for personal and professional development
- +Diverse student body and global community
- +Strong academic programs and industry-relevant knowledge
- +Supportive faculty and excellent placement support
- +Expert professors and quality cohorts
- +Flexible learning and personalized support
- +Global exposure and networking opportunities
- +Accessible resources and supportive faculty
- +Engaging learning environment and quality instruction
- +Opportunities for exposure and growth
- +Practical, real-world focus and curriculum
- +Supportive faculty and positive learning environment
- +Good career prospects and specialized programs
- +Academic excellence and meritocracy
- +Diverse academic offerings and experienced faculty
- +Experiential learning and practical application of business concepts
- +High-quality instruction and direct industry leader engagement
- +International exposure and strong peer networking opportunities
- -Lack of practical value and shallow content in courses.
- -Unfair and frustrating grading, especially for group projects.
- -Disappointing professor engagement and program support.
- -High tuition fees and poor job placement rates are a major concern.
- -Limited and often damaged recreational facilities detract from the student experience.
- -The university offers a poor value for money regarding services provided.
- -Poor communication and administrative issues are common complaints.
- -Facilities are often described as outdated or in disrepair.
- -Course content and teaching quality are frequently criticized.
- -Administrative and communication issues cause stress.
- -Lack of support is a recurring problem.
- -High fees and perceived lack of value for money.
- -Poor quality of accommodation and food.
- -Institutional focus on finances over student welfare and study quality.
- -Ineffective communication and disorganized administrative processes cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder learning and comfort.
- -Lack of clear guidance and support from instructors creates confusion and dissatisfaction.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor resources detract from learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.
This institution demonstrates exceptional strength in its internationality and location, both scoring above 4.5. Student life and value also received positive marks, exceeding 4.2 and 4.4 respectively. However, accommodation presents as the weakest area, with the lowest rating of approximately 3.94. Facilities and professors also received solid, though slightly lower, scores in comparison.
This university demonstrates notable strengths in **Student Life**, boasting a high rating. Areas such as **Facilities** and **Professors** also receive favorable scores. Conversely, **Internationality** and **Accomodation** are identified as areas with lower ratings, suggesting potential for improvement in these aspects. The university presents a mixed but generally positive outlook across its evaluated components.
This institution garners exceptional praise, particularly for its professors and international student experience, both scoring a near-perfect 4.82. Facilities, location, and accommodation also received strong marks around 4.64. Student life earned a solid 4.5, while value was rated a commendable 4.73. The university's weakest area, though still strong, is student life.
This institution shines brightest in its location, receiving a near-perfect score. Student life and internationality are also areas of moderate strength. Conversely, accommodation stands out as a significant weakness, along with the perceived value of the education. Ratings for facilities and professors are average.
This institution demonstrates exceptional strength in its **accommodations**, achieving a near-perfect score. Facilities also received a high rating. Conversely, the **location** was the least positively reviewed aspect. Student life, internationality, and value represent solid middle-ground strengths, with professors also scoring favorably.
Performance appears strongest in academic and social spheres, with Professors receiving an outstanding 4.5 and Student Life rated at a solid 4. Internationality also scores well at 4. Areas for potential improvement are facilities, location, and accommodation, all receiving a 3. The university offers good value, reflected in its 4 rating for this aspect.
This institution garners exceptionally high marks, particularly excelling in Student Life with a perfect score. Facilities, Location, and Accomodation are also strong, all receiving 4.5 ratings. Professors and Value are rated highly at 4.67. The lowest score, though still solid, is for Internationality at 4.33.
The vast majority of university students have a positive experience, highlighting academic rigor, practical learning, and international environments. A small fraction of reviews mention disappointment with course content and grading.
With a 4.11/5 average rating from 128 reviews, ~83% praise the university for its diverse student body, supportive environment, and robust academic programs. A small minority (~0.8%) found it expensive with limited recreational facilities and placements.
All 11 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.64/5. Students praise the high quality of professors, impressive and diverse student cohorts, and flexible learning options. The curriculum is described as relevant and contemporary, fostering significant personal and career growth.
The university receives predominantly positive feedback (~75%) with students praising supportive instructors and good facilities. A smaller portion of reviews (~25%) notes administrative delays and communication issues.
Around 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting practical learning, well-structured programs, and helpful faculty. A small portion, ~12%, expressed concerns about cost and facilities.
With an average rating of 3.5/5, ~50% of reviews are positive, highlighting academic excellence and meritocracy. No negative feedback was recorded.
With an average rating of 4.75/5 from four reviews, feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students highlight hands-on learning, business idea development, and valuable connections with industry leaders and peers as significant benefits. Minimal negative feedback was present.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I am just starting my PhD journey and I could not be happier with my choice in ISM. Amazing experience with quality professors AND impressive cohorts. Working full-time, this educational focus would not be feasible if I was not able to be flexible as to when and where I take my classes. It is a tough, long, and robust path that requires focus, but the team at ISM is truly the best. They help navigate the way that will work best for you and not put you in a 'one way fits all' situation to accomplish this massive step. I wanted a global education that was through a recognized, accredited, and respected school and ISM has not just been that, but so much more.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Being here has been such a wild ride. Moving to a new country every semester and learning local languages has been both fun and challenging, but it's kinda exhausting too. Still, that hustle gives me an adrenaline rush I low-key love! The best part has been seeing our business ideas come to life and when people genuinely appreciate and engage with something we’ve built, it makes all the hard work worth it.
