Vilnius University vs Vilnius University of Applied Sciences - VIKO vs Mykolas Romeris University - MRU vs SMK College of Applied Sciences - SMK vs BMI Executive Institute

Side-by-side comparison from 229 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Vilnius University (4.60)
Vilnius University: wins 3/7 categories
Vilnius University of Applied Sciences - VIKO: wins 4/7 categories
Mykolas Romeris University - MRU: wins 0/7 categories
SMK College of Applied Sciences - SMK: wins 0/7 categories
BMI Executive Institute: wins 0/7 categories
Kazimieras Simonavicius University: wins 0/7 categories
Vilnius Business College: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Vilnius, Lithuania
4.60
Top
Read more reviews
151 reviews
×
Best programme: Business Administration in Management
Best programme: Bachelor of Software Engineering
Best programme: Psychology
Best programme: International Business
Vilnius, Lithuania
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Aviation Management
Best programme: Bachelor of Software Engineering
Category ratings
Facilities
4.39
4.53
Win
4.25
4.26
Not rated
3.00
4.00
Location
4.58
Win
4.54
4.42
4.36
Not rated
3.00
3.83
Professors
4.58
Win
4.28
4.25
4.19
Not rated
4.00
4.33
Internationality
4.44
4.54
Win
4.45
4.26
Not rated
4.00
3.83
Student life
4.44
4.57
Win
4.45
4.27
Not rated
3.00
3.67
Value
4.60
Win
4.53
4.26
3.96
Not rated
3.50
3.50
Accommodation
3.69
4.10
Win
4.07
3.12
Not rated
3.00
3.50
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Excellent learning system and accessible study materials
  • +Supportive and knowledgeable faculty and coordinators
  • +Strong academic programs with practical training opportunities
  • +Practical, applied learning focused on real-world skills
  • +Supportive and knowledgeable teaching staff
  • +Opportunities for success and career preparation
  • +Welcoming international environment and diverse student body
  • +Knowledgeable and supportive professors
  • +Practical, skill-focused learning opportunities
  • +Supportive and knowledgeable lecturers
  • +Modern study environment and facilities
  • +Balance of theory and practical, real-world application

Nothing to show

  • +Expert and recognized faculty
  • +Relevant and modern curriculum
  • +Practical business applications
  • +Supportive faculty and practical, relevant curriculum
  • +Smooth, organized admissions and international student support
  • +Modern, English-taught programs focused on practical skills
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources detract from the learning experience.
  • -Lack of support and guidance from faculty is a recurring concern.
  • -Administrative and management issues are frequently cited.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a common complaint.
  • -The curriculum and teaching methods are often perceived as ineffective or irrelevant.
  • -Lack of adequate support and guidance from professors
  • -Unrealistic and overwhelming initial course expectations
  • -Poor quality of facilities, particularly dormitories
  • -Outdated facilities and limited resources are a significant drawback.
  • -The university suffers from administrative inefficiencies and poor management.
  • -A lack of course variety and limited English-taught programs are disappointing.

Nothing to show

  • -Students dislike administrative and management issues.
  • -Students are unhappy with outdated facilities and poor maintenance.
  • -Students find the curriculum to be unengaging and irrelevant.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder the learning experience.
  • -Poor communication and lack of support from staff are consistent complaints.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution receives exceptional ratings in several key areas, particularly excelling in **Value** (4.60) and **Professors** (4.58). Student life, location, and internationality also score highly. However, **Accommodation** stands out as the weakest area, receiving a significantly lower rating. Overall, the university demonstrates a strong academic and social environment, with room for improvement in its housing provisions.

This institution demonstrates strong performance in several key areas, with Student Life and Location receiving particularly high marks. Facilities and Internationality also rank very favorably. While Accomodation is rated lower than other categories, it remains a solid score, indicating an overall positive university experience. Professors' ratings, while good, are the lowest among the surveyed aspects.

This institution excels in student life and internationality, both scoring a high 4.45. Location also received a strong rating of 4.42. Accommodation is the lowest-rated area at 4.07, though other aspects like facilities, professors, and value remain solidly above 4.0.

Overall, the university garners positive feedback, with location and student life receiving particularly high marks. Facilities and internationality are also rated strongly. Areas for improvement are accommodation, which is the weakest aspect, and value, which is moderately rated. Professors and facilities also show solid scores, contributing to a generally favorable university experience.

Nothing to show

This institution demonstrates a solid performance with notable strengths in its **Professors** and **Internationality**, both receiving a strong 4-star rating. The university offers a more average experience in **Facilities**, **Location**, **Student Life**, and **Accomodation**, each scoring 3 stars. The overall **Value** is rated at a respectable 3.5 stars, suggesting a good return for students.

This institution receives high marks for its academic offerings, with Professors earning a strong 4.33. Facilities are also well-regarded, scoring a 4. However, areas for potential improvement include Accomodation and Value, both receiving a 3.5 rating. Student Life presents a mixed picture, rated at 3.67, while Location and Internationality fall in the mid-range with 3.83.

Reviews summary
Highlights

The university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with ~93% of students rating it 4–5 stars. Praised aspects include learning systems, humble and helpful teachers, and an international environment. Minimal negative feedback exists.

With an average rating of 4.47/5 from 15 reviews, ~93% are positive. Students highlight the practical curriculum, supportive faculty, and opportunities for success. No negative reviews were provided.

With a 4.39 average rating from 28 reviews, ~96% are positive, highlighting a welcoming international environment, supportive professors, and practical learning. A small ~4% of feedback mentioned some programs needing improvement for challenging, research-focused study.

Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting approachable lecturers, practical skills focus, and modern facilities. A single negative review (~3.7%) mentioned the institution being small.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 4.5/5, university students report positive experiences, highlighting professional and knowledgeable lecturers. The curriculum is noted as modern, relevant, and offering practical business applications. No negative feedback was received.

With an average rating of 4/5, feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students highlight a good learning environment, quality of education with practical studies, and helpful international admission support.

Rating distribution
5★
69%
53%
54%
59%
0%
50%
50%
4★
25%
40%
36%
19%
0%
50%
0%
3★
6%
7%
7%
19%
0%
0%
50%
2★
1%
0%
4%
4%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
System

For me, Vilnius University is well known & best University in whole Europe. Many international students are studying here.They are really making friendly rules for EU students though which is not applicable for Non EU students.There are lot of students from Asia & Africa continent's.As we know meximum things are different in these continent's, so they are facing huge problems after coming here for every case. In abroad, I think University's are like a family for us, so they should make some rules for us, which can release our academic & mental pressure, such as academic leave for a semester or a year.Now we can take the academic leave though I don’t think It’s the perfect way for non Eu students. So I am requesting that Universities should consider these matters for Non Eu students. Without these I love my University.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Practical Tourism and Recreation Studies

I am currently studying in the Tourism and Recreation programme and have completed four semesters. Overall, my experience at SMK College of Applied Sciences has been positive. The programme combines theoretical knowledge with practical activities, helping students understand how the tourism and recreation industry works in real-life situations. The lecturers are generally supportive and willing to help students when needed. Classes cover a variety of topics related to tourism, hospitality, recreation, and business, which provides a broad understanding of the field. I also appreciate the opportunity to work on projects and assignments that encourage teamwork and problem-solving skills. The college has an international environment, allowing students to meet people from different countries and cultures. This makes studying more interesting and helps improve communication skills. One area that could be improved is the organization of some administrative processes, which can occasionally take longer than expected. However, this has not significantly affected my studies. I would recommend SMK College of Applied Sciences to students who are interested in tourism and recreation and are looking for a practical, career-oriented study programme.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close