Vilnius University vs Vilnius Tech vs Mykolas Romeris University - MRU vs ISM University of Management and Economics vs SMK College of Applied Sciences - SMK
Side-by-side comparison from 293 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Excellent learning system and accessible study materials
- +Supportive and knowledgeable faculty and coordinators
- +Strong academic programs with practical training opportunities
- +Practical, future-oriented programs and strong academic curriculum
- +Inspiring, collaborative environment and creative innovation focus
- +Supportive professors, clear explanations, and useful, relevant subjects
- +Welcoming international environment and diverse student body
- +Knowledgeable and supportive professors
- +Practical, skill-focused learning opportunities
- +Passionate faculty with international, practical experience
- +Strong balance of theory and real-world application
- +Valuable opportunities and networking
- +Supportive and knowledgeable lecturers
- +Modern study environment and facilities
- +Balance of theory and practical, real-world application
- +Expert and recognized faculty
- +Relevant and modern curriculum
- +Practical business applications
- +Supportive faculty and practical, relevant curriculum
- +Smooth, organized admissions and international student support
- +Modern, English-taught programs focused on practical skills
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources detract from the learning experience.
- -Lack of support and guidance from faculty is a recurring concern.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
- -Lack of support and resources impacts student experience.
- -Lack of adequate support and guidance from professors
- -Unrealistic and overwhelming initial course expectations
- -Poor quality of facilities, particularly dormitories
- -Administrative and management issues are a constant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of communication and support from faculty and staff is prevalent.
- -Outdated facilities and limited resources are a significant drawback.
- -The university suffers from administrative inefficiencies and poor management.
- -A lack of course variety and limited English-taught programs are disappointing.
- -Students dislike administrative and management issues.
- -Students are unhappy with outdated facilities and poor maintenance.
- -Students find the curriculum to be unengaging and irrelevant.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder the learning experience.
- -Poor communication and lack of support from staff are consistent complaints.
This institution receives exceptional ratings in several key areas, particularly excelling in **Value** (4.60) and **Professors** (4.58). Student life, location, and internationality also score highly. However, **Accommodation** stands out as the weakest area, receiving a significantly lower rating. Overall, the university demonstrates a strong academic and social environment, with room for improvement in its housing provisions.
This institution demonstrates commendable strengths, particularly in its **Location**, receiving the highest rating. **Student Life** also scores very favorably. While all aspects are well-regarded, **Accomodation** received the lowest score among the assessed areas, indicating room for improvement in that specific category. Overall, the university presents a solid offering with distinct highlights.
This institution excels in student life and internationality, both scoring a high 4.45. Location also received a strong rating of 4.42. Accommodation is the lowest-rated area at 4.07, though other aspects like facilities, professors, and value remain solidly above 4.0.
With exceptionally high marks in several key areas, this institution excels in its **Facilities** (4.83) and **Location** (4.85). **Student Life** (4.76) and **Value** (4.73) also received very positive feedback. **Professors** (4.57) and **Internationality** (4.41) are rated well, though not quite as strongly. The **Accomodation** score (3.31) stands out as the weakest area in the assessment.
Overall, the university garners positive feedback, with location and student life receiving particularly high marks. Facilities and internationality are also rated strongly. Areas for improvement are accommodation, which is the weakest aspect, and value, which is moderately rated. Professors and facilities also show solid scores, contributing to a generally favorable university experience.
This institution demonstrates a solid performance with notable strengths in its **Professors** and **Internationality**, both receiving a strong 4-star rating. The university offers a more average experience in **Facilities**, **Location**, **Student Life**, and **Accomodation**, each scoring 3 stars. The overall **Value** is rated at a respectable 3.5 stars, suggesting a good return for students.
This institution receives high marks for its academic offerings, with Professors earning a strong 4.33. Facilities are also well-regarded, scoring a 4. However, areas for potential improvement include Accomodation and Value, both receiving a 3.5 rating. Student Life presents a mixed picture, rated at 3.67, while Location and Internationality fall in the mid-range with 3.83.
The university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with ~93% of students rating it 4–5 stars. Praised aspects include learning systems, humble and helpful teachers, and an international environment. Minimal negative feedback exists.
University reviews are highly positive, with ~100% giving 4-5 stars and an average rating of 4.33/5. Students praise well-structured, future-oriented programs, practical applications, and excellent academic facilities.
With a 4.39 average rating from 28 reviews, ~96% are positive, highlighting a welcoming international environment, supportive professors, and practical learning. A small ~4% of feedback mentioned some programs needing improvement for challenging, research-focused study.
With an average rating of 4.73/5 from 37 reviews, ~100% of feedback is positive. Students praise the balance of theory and practice, passionate faculty with international experience, and the overall enriching educational experience.
Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting approachable lecturers, practical skills focus, and modern facilities. A single negative review (~3.7%) mentioned the institution being small.
With an average rating of 4.5/5, university students report positive experiences, highlighting professional and knowledgeable lecturers. The curriculum is noted as modern, relevant, and offering practical business applications. No negative feedback was received.
With an average rating of 4/5, feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students highlight a good learning environment, quality of education with practical studies, and helpful international admission support.
For me, Vilnius University is well known & best University in whole Europe. Many international students are studying here.They are really making friendly rules for EU students though which is not applicable for Non EU students.There are lot of students from Asia & Africa continent's.As we know meximum things are different in these continent's, so they are facing huge problems after coming here for every case. In abroad, I think University's are like a family for us, so they should make some rules for us, which can release our academic & mental pressure, such as academic leave for a semester or a year.Now we can take the academic leave though I don’t think It’s the perfect way for non Eu students. So I am requesting that Universities should consider these matters for Non Eu students. Without these I love my University.
VGTU is one of the best technical universities in Lithuania. They provide many field of studies for students and good environemnet for studies at all. Moreover, its International office provides many opportunities to study or doing internship abroad, thus have cooperation with many international universities around the world. Thanks to VGTU, I got a summer internship 2019 in Belgium and received good feedback there and, at the moment, I am studying in Estonia by bilateral agreement. I especially want to note teachers staff of the department where I study. They are good specialists and share necessary experience during lectures which can be useful for the future job. Furthermore, sometimes they send us actual vacancies and give recommendations to some companies who are ready to consider students' applications. For me personally this university "opened a window of life". I have met a lot of people from other countries, learned new things and got valuable life experience.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I am currently studying in the Tourism and Recreation programme and have completed four semesters. Overall, my experience at SMK College of Applied Sciences has been positive. The programme combines theoretical knowledge with practical activities, helping students understand how the tourism and recreation industry works in real-life situations. The lecturers are generally supportive and willing to help students when needed. Classes cover a variety of topics related to tourism, hospitality, recreation, and business, which provides a broad understanding of the field. I also appreciate the opportunity to work on projects and assignments that encourage teamwork and problem-solving skills. The college has an international environment, allowing students to meet people from different countries and cultures. This makes studying more interesting and helps improve communication skills. One area that could be improved is the organization of some administrative processes, which can occasionally take longer than expected. However, this has not significantly affected my studies. I would recommend SMK College of Applied Sciences to students who are interested in tourism and recreation and are looking for a practical, career-oriented study programme.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
