Aston Business School vs University of Europe for Applied Sciences vs Mwenge Catholic University - MWECAU vs Weber State University vs Pondicherry University

Side-by-side comparison from 25 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Aston Business School: wins 2/7 categories
University of Europe for Applied Sciences: wins 0/7 categories
Mwenge Catholic University - MWECAU: wins 0/7 categories
Weber State University: wins 0/7 categories
Pondicherry University: wins 2/7 categories
Moshi Cooperative University: wins 0/7 categories
Centro Universitário de Rio Preto - UNIRP: wins 3/7 categories
Comparing
Birmingham, The United Kingdom
4.10
Read more reviews
14 reviews
×
Best programme: Business Management
Best programme: Bachelor of Arts in Digital Media Arts
Best programme: Art and Environment
Ogden, United States
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Pondicherry, India
4.80
Read more reviews
4 reviews
×
Best programme: Computer Science and Engineering
kilimanjaro, Tanzania
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
São José do Rio Preto, Brazil
5.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Law
Category ratings
Facilities
4.14
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
4.25
Not rated
5.00
Win
Location
4.64
3.60
Not rated
Not rated
4.75
Win
Not rated
4.00
Professors
4.29
3.20
4.00
Not rated
4.25
Not rated
5.00
Win
Internationality
4.07
Win
4.00
3.00
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
3.00
Student life
4.38
3.00
4.00
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.00
Value
4.21
2.80
4.00
Not rated
3.25
Not rated
5.00
Win
Accommodation
4.14
Win
1.40
Not rated
Not rated
3.75
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Practical, real-world curriculum
  • +Focus on personal and leadership development
  • +Supportive learning environment and resources
  • +Hands-on learning and practical application focus
  • +International and multicultural environment
  • +Personalized attention and smaller class sizes
  • +Practical, technology-focused teaching

Nothing to show

  • +Freedom and individual growth opportunities
  • +Strong academics, knowledgeable and supportive faculty
  • +Modern and well-maintained campus facilities

Nothing to show

  • +Excellent professors and high-quality education
  • +Strong student dedication encouraged and supported
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a consistent concern.
  • -Limited resources and lack of essential amenities create difficulties.
  • -Administrative and management issues, including poor organization and miscommunication.
  • -Outdated teaching methods and inadequate facilities.
  • -Lack of academic integrity and student support.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and a lack of student support are major concerns.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning and comfort.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support exacerbates problems.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are common complaints.
  • -Course content is often perceived as irrelevant or lacking practical application.
Rating summary
What students say

Examining the university's performance across several key metrics reveals a varied picture. The institution shines particularly brightly in **Location**, receiving the highest score. Conversely, **Internationality** garnered the lowest rating. Other areas such as Professors, Student Life, and Value also received strong scores, indicating a generally positive overall experience, though improvements in international student integration could be beneficial.

This institution demonstrates notable strengths in **internationality**, receiving a high rating of 4. Conversely, **accommodation** stands out as a significant area for improvement, with the lowest score of 1.4. Other aspects like location and professors show moderate performance.

Performance data indicates notable strengths in teaching quality, student engagement, and perceived value, with professors, student life, and value all receiving top marks. Conversely, the university significantly underperforms in facilities, location, and accommodation, all of which were rated at the lowest possible score. Internationality also received a mid-range rating.

Nothing to show

This institution garners excellent marks for its vibrant student life, scoring a perfect 5. Location is another significant strength, with a 4.75 rating. Areas for potential improvement include value, rated at 3.25, and accommodation, which received a 3.75. Other aspects like facilities, professors, and internationality fall within a solid 4 to 4.25 range.

Nothing to show

This institution excels significantly in its **Facilities**, **Professors**, and **Value**, all receiving perfect scores. Student life and location are also robustly rated. Conversely, **Accommodations** present a clear area for improvement, scoring zero. Internationality offers moderate standing. Overall, the university demonstrates exceptional strengths in core academic and value-driven aspects.

Reviews summary
Highlights

~100% of reviews are positive, praising the excellent curriculum, personal development opportunities, and supportive learning environment. No negative feedback was recorded.

Reviews indicate a 3/5 average rating, with ~60% positive feedback highlighting practical, hands-on learning and a multicultural environment. Negative feedback, ~40%, points to poor organization, miscommunication, and outdated teaching methods.

With a perfect 5/5 average rating from one review, sentiment is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). The sole reviewer highlighted practical teaching and technological development, recommending the university.

Nothing to show

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%), with an average rating of 4.75/5. Students highlight excellent educational experiences, individual growth opportunities, and supportive faculty. Well-maintained facilities and engaging coursework are frequently praised.

Nothing to show

With a perfect 5/5 average rating, this university receives universally positive feedback. Students highlight excellent professors and a commitment to exceeding basic educational standards.

Rating distribution
5★
29%
0%
100%
0%
75%
0%
100%
4★
57%
60%
0%
0%
25%
0%
0%
3★
14%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
20%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
20%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Employability

I have had a very positive experience in my first year at this university. I have found the staff very friendly, all content very engaging and felt I have been challenged throughout the year. One aspect that is particularly strong is the employability at Aston with all modules focusing on giving students hard skills to increase their employability. Only complaint would be some administrative problems such as delayed exam results and some issues with timetabling at the start of term.

Disaster Programme

Throughout my Studies, in the Communication Design Course at this university located in Berlin, I have experienced a lot of problems. The university is very poorly organized, there is constant miscommunication between staff and students. It is very hard to come in contact with the university over email or phone, and most of the time your issue is never resolved. An excuse they often times use, is that they are understaffed, or it’s the students' fault. I think the campus in Berlin is kind of scam, because when applying or looking up this University the only photos you can see are from their facility located in Hamburg. Which is a much nicer facility than the one in Berlin. Definitely visit before signing any contracts. When I joined the university I expected at least one course to provide the necessary skills and information for this course. There was no introductory class for how to use Adobe software, no tutorial classes on any of the skills we needed during our studies. This is very much a do it yourself at home Programme. It is very hard to get help from the staff as they are often very misleading as no information is communicated to them. I have graduated 2 months ago and I still have no received a diploma.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close