Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México - UNAM vs Universidad La Salle - ULSA vs Universidad Anáhuac vs Colegio Iberoamericano Barnard - CIB vs Escuela Bancaria y Comercial - EBC

Side-by-side comparison from 124 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Universidad Anáhuac (4.60)
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México - UNAM: wins 0/6 categories
Universidad La Salle - ULSA: wins 0/6 categories
Universidad Anáhuac: wins 4/6 categories
Colegio Iberoamericano Barnard - CIB: wins 0/6 categories
Escuela Bancaria y Comercial - EBC: wins 0/6 categories
ISDI Madrid Digital Business School: wins 0/6 categories
Ironhack: wins 2/6 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Actuarial Mathematics
Best programme: Applied Psychology
Cancun, Mexico
4.60
Top
Read more reviews
33 reviews
×
Best programme: Communication
Best programme: BBA International Business
Barcelona, Spain
3.00
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: UX/UI Design (User Experience / User Interface Design)
Category ratings
Facilities
4.04
4.67
4.50
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
5.00
Win
Location
4.27
4.33
4.50
Not rated
4.50
Not rated
5.00
Win
Professors
4.32
4.00
4.41
Win
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
3.00
Internationality
4.06
4.00
4.59
Win
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
3.00
Student life
4.29
4.33
4.63
Not rated
5.00
Not rated
5.00
Value
4.40
4.00
4.63
Win
Not rated
4.50
Not rated
3.00
Accommodation
3.32
3.67
4.66
Win
Not rated
3.50
Not rated
4.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Academic excellence and diverse, relevant programs
  • +Supportive environment and helpful professors
  • +Modern facilities, scholarships, and campus safety
  • +High academic quality and recognition
  • +Friendly environment and humanistic values
  • +Helpful professors and staff
  • +Leadership and values development
  • +Academic excellence and practical application
  • +Supportive community and modern facilities

Nothing to show

  • +Practical application of theory with real-world relevance
  • +Career flexibility and diverse job opportunities
  • +Instructors with industry experience and business acumen

Nothing to show

  • +Practical, hands-on learning with immediate application
  • +Experienced, professional instructors with industry expertise
  • +Engaging hybrid learning format
Cons
  • -Limited student support and resources outside of the library.
  • -Overcrowded classes hinder teacher attention and individual assistance.
  • -Perceived lack of evolution and adaptability within the academic environment.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Communication breakdowns and lack of support are recurring problems.
  • -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a problem.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support is evident.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are frequently cited.
  • -Ineffective teaching methods and a disconnect with course material are common complaints.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues.
  • -Perceived lack of value for money.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its faculty, student life, and overall value, with ratings of 4.32, 4.29, and 4.4 respectively. Its facilities and internationality are also well-regarded, scoring above 4.0. The weakest area identified is accommodation, receiving a rating of 3.32, which suggests room for improvement in this aspect of the student experience.

This institution garners exceptionally high marks for its **Facilities**, achieving a score of 4.67. Its **Location** and **Student Life** are also well-regarded, both receiving 4.33. While **Professors** and **Internationality** are rated a solid 4, and **Value** at 4, the **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest area with a score of 3.67.

This institution garners excellent scores, with accommodation standing out as its strongest area at 4.65625. Student life and value also received high marks. Professors represent the area with the lowest rating at 4.40625, though it remains a very positive score. Overall, the university demonstrates considerable strengths in most aspects evaluated.

Nothing to show

This institution receives particularly high marks for its vibrant Student Life, scoring a perfect 5. The Location and Value are also strong points, both rated at 4.5. Conversely, Internationality is the weakest area, receiving a rating of 3, with Accomodation also scoring slightly lower at 3.5. Facilities and Professors are rated solidly at 4.

Nothing to show

With exceptional marks in Facilities and Location, this institution clearly excels in its physical environment and accessibility. Student Life also receives top scores, suggesting a vibrant campus experience. Conversely, the university's weakest areas lie in its Professors and Internationality, both rated a moderate three. Value also sits at this mid-tier rating, indicating areas for potential improvement.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Most reviews are positive (~96%), highlighting academic richness, diverse programs, and a vibrant campus. A small number of negative comments (~4%) mention overcrowded classes.

With an average rating of 4.27/5 from 15 reviews, ~87% of feedback is positive. Students highlight high academic quality, excellent learning environments, and helpful staff. Location is a minor point for improvement.

With ~97% positive feedback and an average of 4.58/5, students praise academic excellence, leadership development, and integral personal growth programs. No negative reviews were recorded.

Nothing to show

All three reviews are positive (100%), with an average rating of 4.33/5. Students praise the practical application of theory, teachers' industry experience, and the broad career opportunities offered by their degrees.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 3/5, feedback is evenly split, with ~50% positive and ~50% negative. Positive comments highlight practical, hands-on learning and professional instructors. Negative reviews express dissatisfaction with program value and staff.

Rating distribution
5★
55%
40%
67%
0%
33%
0%
50%
4★
32%
47%
39%
0%
67%
0%
0%
3★
8%
13%
3%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
4%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
50%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close