Universidad La Salle - ULSA vs Universidad Tecnológica de México - UNITEC vs Universidad Anáhuac vs Le Cordon Bleu Paris vs ISDI Madrid Digital Business School

Side-by-side comparison from 80 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Universidad de Londres - UDL (5.00)
Universidad La Salle - ULSA: wins 0/5 categories
Universidad Tecnológica de México - UNITEC: wins 0/5 categories
Universidad Anáhuac: wins 1/5 categories
Le Cordon Bleu Paris: wins 1/5 categories
ISDI Madrid Digital Business School: wins 0/5 categories
Ironhack: wins 1/5 categories
Universidad de Londres - UDL: wins 2/5 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Applied Psychology
Best programme: Art and Design
Best programme: Communication
Best programme: Culinary Arts
Barcelona, Spain
3.00
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: UX/UI Design (User Experience / User Interface Design)
Mexico City, Mexico
5.00
Top
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: Acting
Category ratings
Facilities
3.83
4.30
4.53
4.40
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.50
Location
4.33
4.63
4.49
4.70
Not rated
5.00
5.00
Professors
4.17
4.60
4.42
4.60
Not rated
3.00
5.00
Win
Internationality
4.00
3.70
4.58
4.60
Win
Not rated
3.00
4.50
Student life
4.00
4.56
4.63
3.90
Not rated
5.00
5.00
Value
3.67
4.00
4.58
3.90
Not rated
3.00
5.00
Win
Accommodation
3.50
3.88
4.64
Win
3.00
Not rated
4.00
4.50
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +High academic quality and strong professional skills development.
  • +Integral and humanistic education fostering values and personal growth.
  • +Friendly environment and supportive community contribute to a positive learning experience.
  • +Quality professors with relevant industry experience
  • +Flexible programs supporting work-study balance
  • +Supportive environment and accessible education
  • +Integral formation and practical application of knowledge
  • +Focus on developing leaders with values and strategic vision
  • +Academic excellence, personal growth, and community engagement
  • +Exceptional teaching quality from passionate, experienced instructors
  • +Unmatched precision, emphasis on quality, and professional skill development
  • +Welcoming environment, strong support, and valuable alumni network

Nothing to show

  • +Practical, hands-on learning with immediate application
  • +Experienced, professional instructors with industry expertise
  • +Engaging hybrid learning format
  • +Excellent teachers and strong student support
  • +Well-maintained facilities and accessible cafeteria
  • +Attractive schedules and student wellness programs
Cons
  • -Outdated facilities and unreliable internet are major issues.
  • -Administrative and management issues, including false accusations, are a significant concern.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause constant frustration.
  • -Facilities are consistently described as outdated and poorly maintained.
  • -Overcrowded classrooms and insufficient resources negatively impact learning.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources are a recurring problem.
  • -Students face difficulties with unresponsive administrative and management issues.
  • -The curriculum and teaching methods are often perceived as unengaging or irrelevant.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are disappointing.
  • -The curriculum feels irrelevant and disconnected from real-world needs.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues.
  • -Perceived lack of value for money.
  • -Lack of practical experience and outdated curriculum are major concerns.
  • -Students are dissatisfied with administrative and management issues.
  • -Facilities are consistently described as outdated and insufficient.
Rating summary
What students say

This university garners its highest marks in Location, with a strong showing for Professors and Student Life as well. Areas for potential improvement include Accommodations and Facilities, which received the lowest ratings. The university's Internationality and Value also represent solid mid-range scores.

This university demonstrates a strong academic and social environment, with notable strengths in Professors (4.6), Location (4.625), and Student Life (4.55). Facilities also score well at 4.3, contributing to a positive student experience. However, areas for development include Accomodation (3.875) and Internationality (3.7), representing the lowest-rated aspects among the surveyed categories. Value for money is rated at a solid 4.

This university garners strong feedback, particularly excelling in **Accomodation** and **Student Life**, both scoring an impressive 4.67. **Value** and **Internationality** also received high marks. Areas with slightly lower, though still positive, scores include **Professors** at 4.42, which represents the weakest performance among the evaluated aspects. Facilities and location are rated very favorably, around 4.5.

This university demonstrates exceptional strength in its **location** (4.7), **professors** (4.6), and **internationality** (4.6). Students are particularly impressed with the quality of instruction and the global environment. Conversely, **accommodation** stands out as the lowest-rated area at 3.0, suggesting room for improvement in this aspect. Student life and value for money also received moderate scores.

Nothing to show

With exceptional marks in Facilities and Location, this institution clearly excels in its physical environment and accessibility. Student Life also receives top scores, suggesting a vibrant campus experience. Conversely, the university's weakest areas lie in its Professors and Internationality, both rated a moderate three. Value also sits at this mid-tier rating, indicating areas for potential improvement.

This institution excels across numerous aspects, earning perfect scores in Location, Professors, Student Life, and Value. Facilities and Accomodation are also highly regarded with 4.5 ratings, reflecting excellent support for students. Internationality also scores strongly at 4.5. While no areas are rated poorly, the slightly lower, though still very positive, scores for facilities and accommodation suggest these might be areas with the most room for minor improvement compared to other exceptional aspects.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4.17/5, approximately 83% of 18 reviews are positive, highlighting strong academic quality and values. A small amount of negative feedback mentioned outdated facilities.

With an average rating of 4/5 from 11 reviews, ~74% are positive. Students appreciate the quality of professors and flexible study programs. There is no negative feedback.

University students overwhelmingly praise its integral formation, practical study plans, and focus on developing leaders. This ~100% positive feedback highlights strong academic programs, professional readiness, and personal growth opportunities.

Students highly praise the exceptional quality of teaching and knowledgeable instructors. Facilities are noted as impeccable and the learning environment welcoming, contributing to professional and personal growth for ~100% of reviewers.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 3/5, feedback is evenly split, with ~50% positive and ~50% negative. Positive comments highlight practical, hands-on learning and professional instructors. Negative reviews express dissatisfaction with program value and staff.

With two positive reviews and an average rating of 5/5, student feedback highlights good teachers and clean facilities. Students also appreciate the attractive schedules and affordable cafeteria options.

Rating distribution
5★
39%
36%
62%
60%
0%
50%
100%
4★
44%
27%
35%
40%
0%
0%
0%
3★
11%
36%
3%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
6%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
50%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Student in 2013

I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close